本文關鍵詞： 俄羅斯 歐亞主義 復興　出處：《黑龍江省社會科學院》2008年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】： 歐亞主義是與大西洋主義和斯拉夫主義相并稱的影響俄羅斯社會發(fā)展的三大社會思潮之一。俄羅斯是我國最大鄰國,俄羅斯的發(fā)展必將對我國產(chǎn)生重大影響。了解這個大國的重要政治思潮,對于解讀俄羅斯歷史、預測俄羅斯未來走勢無疑是至關重要的,具有極強的理論意義和現(xiàn)實意義。 本文在收集了大量國內(nèi)外有關俄羅斯歐亞主義研究的資料基礎上,對歐亞主義的發(fā)展史進行了系統(tǒng)的梳理。全文由中文內(nèi)容摘要、外文內(nèi)容摘要、前言、正文、注釋、參考文獻六部分組成。其中正文共分為五部分： 第一部分,以關于俄羅斯文明屬性的爭論為切人點,引出歐亞主義對此問題的基本觀點,將歐亞主義與大西洋主義和斯拉夫主義作比較,簡要介紹了歐亞主義產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展的歷史脈絡。 第二至第四部分,系統(tǒng)地闡述了歐亞主義產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展的歷程。以時間為主線,依據(jù)歐亞主義在各歷史時期的興衰起伏和思想變遷將其分為三個階段：“古典”歐亞主義、古米廖夫歐亞主義和新歐亞主義。通過對歐亞主義各階段主要代表人物及其觀點的評介并結合俄羅斯地理位置、歷史文化和民族的特殊性得出歐亞主義產(chǎn)生、存在和發(fā)展的合理性和必然性。 “古典”歐亞主義是指俄羅斯歐亞主義的早期階段(20世紀20年代——30年代后期),發(fā)起者是十月革命后流亡國外的俄羅斯僑民知識分子,這一階段最具有代表性的人物是尼·謝·特魯別茨科伊和彼·尼·薩維茨基等人。他們從各自的研究領域出發(fā)對歐亞主義進行了各具特色的表述�！肮诺洹睔W亞主義與布爾什維主義在理論上存在某些相似性,筆者對此作了簡要論述。 “古典”歐亞主義由于后期參與者的變動、學術觀點各異、政治立場分歧以及蘇聯(lián)政府對歐亞主義運動的打壓,到20世紀30年代后期逐漸衰落并進入了漫長的沉寂時期。但歐亞主義思想的火種卻并未熄滅,這一階段起到承前啟后作用的歐亞主義者是列·古米廖夫,他使歐亞主義在俄羅斯得以延續(xù)和發(fā)展,為以后的復興奠定了基礎。因此,本文稱這一階段為“古米廖夫歐亞主義”。 20世紀90年代初以來的歐亞主義即為本文所指的第三階段——“新歐亞主義”,它是伴隨著蘇聯(lián)解體和國際政治經(jīng)濟的風云突變而在俄羅斯驟然復興的,本文對歐亞主義復興的原因進行了深入的探討。新歐亞主義者主要有亞·杜金和根·安·久加諾夫等。亞·杜金領導的政治組織擴大了歐亞主義在俄羅斯社會傳播的廣度和深度,尤其是“國際歐亞主義運動”的創(chuàng)立促使歐亞主義日益走向國際化。 第五部分,在馬克思主義歷史觀的指導下從總體上對俄羅斯歐亞主義發(fā)展史進行評析。著重分析了歐亞主義對俄羅斯國內(nèi)社會各領域以及獨聯(lián)體內(nèi)的中亞國家的影響,得出了對歐亞主義發(fā)展史的若干思考,對歐亞主義在俄羅斯的未來發(fā)展趨勢作出了前瞻性預測。
[Abstract]:Eurasian doctrine is the doctrine of the Atlantic doctrine and the Slavic influence. It is one of the three major social thoughts of Russian social development. Russia is China's biggest neighbor, Russia's development will have a significant impact on our understanding of this important political thought. Powers, for interpretation of the history of Russia, Russia's future trend forecast is undoubtedly essential that has great theoretical significance and practical significance.
Based on the collection of a large number of domestic and foreign relevant Russian Eurasianist research data on the basis of the development history of Eurasianism was analyzed systematically. This thesis consists of Chinese abstract, foreign language content summary, preface, text, notes, references of six parts. The text is divided into five parts:
The first part, based on the debate on the nature of Russian civilization, points out the basic ideas of Eurasia's issue, compares Eurasia and the Atlantic and Slavism, and briefly introduces the historical context of the emergence and development of Eurasia.
The second to the fourth part, elaborated systematically the formation and development of Eurasianism. With time as the main line, on the basis of Eurasianism ups and downs and ideological change in different historical periods will be divided into three stages: the "classical" Eurasian doctrine, L.N.Gumilyov Eurasian doctrine and new Eurasian doctrine. And combined with the geography of Russia the position through commentary on the main representative figures and their ideas in various stages of Eurasianism, special history and culture of the national the Eurasian doctrine, the existence and development of rationality and necessity.
The "classical" Eurasian doctrine refers to the early stage of the Russian Eurasianist (1920s - late 30s), the initiator is after the October revolution, the exiled Russian intellectuals, this stage is the most representative figures are Ni Semyon Trubetskoi and Pi Ni Savitskiy et al. They were of Eurasianism distinctive from the respective fields of research statements. The "classical" Eurasian doctrine and Bolshevism has some similarity in theory, the author has made a brief discussion.
The "classical" Eurasian doctrine since the late participants change, different academic viewpoints, political differences and the Soviet government to suppress the Eurasian movement, from the late 1930s to gradually decline and entered a long period of silence. But Eurasianism fire was not extinguished, this stage plays a transitional role in the Eurasian doctrine is Leo Gumilyov, he made the Eurasianist continuation and development in Russia, laid the foundation for future revival. Therefore, we call this as "L.N.Gumilyov Eurasian doctrine".
Since the beginning of 1990s the Eurasianism is third stage this paper refers to the "new Eurasian doctrine", it is accompanied by the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the international political and economic revival in Russia and a sudden change in the situation suddenly, the reason of the Eurasian revival is discussed. The new Eurasian doctrine mainly A Dugin and Gen Ann Zyuganov. Sub Durkin led political organization to expand the breadth and depth of the Russian Eurasianism in social communication, especially the creation of an International Eurasian movement "to promote Eurasianist increasingly internationalization.
The fifth part, in Marx's view of history under the guidance of the Russian Eurasianist history assessment. On the analysis of the influence of Eurasian doctrine to Russia's domestic society in various fields as well as the Central Asian countries, and draws some reflections on the history of the development of Eurasian doctrine, the Eurasian doctrine in the future development trend of Russian made the prospective forecast.

【學位授予單位】：黑龍江省社會科學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2008
【分類號】：K512.5

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 于春苓;;影響俄羅斯外交的傳統(tǒng)因素[J];北方論叢;2006年05期

2 許智琴,劉懷斌;大俄羅斯主義思想體系對俄國對外政策的影響[J];東北亞論壇;2002年04期

3 李興耕;;久加諾夫的“俄羅斯社會主義”評析[J];當代世界與社會主義;2006年04期

4 姜振軍;俄羅斯遠東地區(qū)的國際經(jīng)濟合作問題[J];東歐中亞市場研究;2002年03期

5 陳訓明;古米廖夫及其歐亞主義述評[J];東歐中亞研究;2002年03期

6 張建華 ,唐艷;近10年來我國學術界關于歐亞主義問題研究綜述[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2005年06期

7 粟瑞雪;;俄羅斯學者關于歐亞主義問題研究綜述[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2006年06期

8 董曉陽;俄羅斯三種社會思想誰主沉浮[J];俄羅斯研究;2002年04期

9 陳訓明;特魯別茨科伊的歐亞主義思想[J];俄羅斯研究;2003年04期

10 汪寧;“回歸歐洲”:俄羅斯有幾道難過的關[J];國際觀察;2004年06期

，

本文編號：1451516