探索一種對(duì)人類(lèi)的新看法——我們時(shí)代交匯點(diǎn)上的文化差異性與一致性
[Abstract]:The focus of this paper is to analyze the role of universal concepts such as human beings in the formation of cultural identity. Since the concept of identity has always been specific and special, the application of universality in the process of identity formation has created logical difficulties: how to balance the relationship between the two. The traditional point of view is that the universal factor serves ethnocentrism, that is, by discriminating against the particularity of others, it separates the identity of itself. However, since the people who are discriminated against are also inseparable from universality, an important feature of cross-cultural relations is the struggle between different universality, as well as the recognition of human beings. The wave of globalization not only intensifies and intensifies this struggle, so it is more important than ever to conceptualize the role of various commonalities in the process of identity formation in a new way. One might ask: is it really possible to transcend the powerful and effective logic of ethnocentrism? Here, the universalism inherent in cultural identity offers us an opportunity to find a new way to link different cultural identities. Such an opportunity is due to the overall role of various commonalities due to their own logic, so generality can be regarded as a link linking cultural differences. However, because of the particularity of one identity relative to others, all kinds of commonalities, such as the bond function of the concept of human beings, must be carefully considered. The focus of reflection on this issue is a view of structural changes in cross-cultural relations from exclusivity to inclusiveness. The purpose of this paper is to hope that the concept of "human" can play a more inclusive role in the process of identity formation. At the same time, this paper also regards human nature as a place where the above tasks can be accomplished. And take it as a subject to discuss and study.
【作者單位】: 埃森文化研究所;遼寧師范大學(xué)外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:K0
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 格奧爾格.伊格爾斯;范麗軍;叢修凡;;全球化與歷史研究[J];山東社會(huì)科學(xué);2008年01期
2 喬治G.伊格爾斯;王晴佳;李淵;王獻(xiàn)華;;歷史和史學(xué)的全球化:特征與挑戰(zhàn)[J];史學(xué)史研究;2008年01期
3 張登文,馬用浩;世界歷史進(jìn)程中后發(fā)展國(guó)家命運(yùn)的求解[J];大連干部學(xué)刊;2005年07期
4 吳英;馬克思的世界歷史理論與全球化歷史進(jìn)程的實(shí)踐[J];史學(xué)理論研究;2005年04期
5 鄧京力;;史學(xué)史研究的當(dāng)代趨向:史學(xué)比較與全球視野[J];學(xué)術(shù)研究;2008年03期
6 文軍;全球化進(jìn)程與中國(guó)城市的全球化趨勢(shì)[J];長(zhǎng)沙電力學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1997年03期
7 商逾;論全球化浪潮中資本主義歷史規(guī)律起作用的機(jī)制[J];理論學(xué)刊;2005年07期
8 多米尼克·塞森麥爾,郭艷秋 ,王f:;全球史——挑戰(zhàn)與束縛[J];山東社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年06期
9 王晴佳,格奧爾格·G·伊格爾斯,李揚(yáng)眉;歷史的重構(gòu)與史學(xué)的轉(zhuǎn)折——一個(gè)跨文化的考察[J];文史哲;2004年06期
10 周敏凱;馬克思“世界歷史觀”與全球化問(wèn)題的理論思考[J];國(guó)際問(wèn)題研究;2003年01期
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條
1 劉桂生;循名責(zé)實(shí):跨文化,,跨語(yǔ)際[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院院報(bào);2004年
2 董欣潔;馬克思世界歷史理論的現(xiàn)代意義[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院院報(bào);2007年
3 曹兵武;文化會(huì)面時(shí)代與節(jié)日文化遺產(chǎn)[N];中國(guó)文物報(bào);2005年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 顧偉偉;馬克思世界歷史理論與全球化[D];蘭州大學(xué);2008年
2 何豐倫;論世界歷史進(jìn)程中的全球化時(shí)代[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2001年
本文編號(hào):2447992
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/sxll/2447992.html