“公眾史學”的理論基礎與學科框架
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-26 21:39
【摘要】："公眾史學"是指公眾在反思自我歷史意識和歷史認識生成的情形下所進行的歷史表現與傳播。在新媒體急劇發(fā)展、自媒體傳播漸成趨勢,而公眾對歷史知識的渴求日益增強的狀況下,職業(yè)歷史學家面臨著兩種路徑的選擇:或者是自覺地反思和分析自我歷史認識、歷史意識的形成過程,揚長補短,成為"公眾史學"的參與者或引導者;或者是繼續(xù)保持"圈內人"并且只面對內行的身份,等待公眾這些"圈外人"或外行在新型知識傳播方式下自我提升,然后被取而代之。以學術學科的建制與專業(yè)性眼光來建設"公眾史學"學科乃當務之急。人們可以在歷史認識形成過程研究與分析的基礎上,超越國外"公眾史學"學科建設在理論設計上的零散性;同時,充分考慮自媒體傳播的趨勢,結合史德、史學方法論、跨學科交流、實務操作四個層次進行學科框架設計。歷史知識的公眾生產與傳播既可以促成社會的有序和健康,也可以導致社會的混亂和病變;在自媒體傳播狀態(tài)下,"歷史"的這種雙刃劍功能可以在很短的時間內迅速轉換。因此,有必要對公眾參與歷史知識的生產與傳播做出戰(zhàn)略性思考,盡可能使之形成一個可控而又開放的健康環(huán)境。
[Abstract]:"Public historiography" refers to the historical manifestation and dissemination of the public under the condition of reflecting on their own historical consciousness and the formation of historical cognition. With the rapid development of new media and the increasing demand for historical knowledge from the media, professional historians are faced with the choice of two ways: self-reflection and analysis of their own historical knowledge. The forming process of historical consciousness, making use of each other and becoming the participant or guide of "public historiography"; Or keep the "insider" and face only the professional identity, waiting for the public "outsiders" or laymen to improve themselves under the new mode of knowledge dissemination, and then be replaced. It is urgent to construct the subject of public history with the system and professional vision of academic discipline. On the basis of the research and analysis of the forming process of historical cognition, people can surpass the scattered nature of the theoretical design of the discipline construction of "public historiography" in foreign countries. At the same time, considering the trend of self-media communication, combining the four levels of ethics, historiography methodology, interdisciplinary communication and practical operation, the author designs the discipline framework. The public production and dissemination of historical knowledge can not only promote the social order and health, but also lead to social chaos and pathological changes. In the state of self-media communication, the "history" double-edged sword function can be quickly changed in a very short time. Therefore, it is necessary to make strategic thinking on public participation in the production and dissemination of historical knowledge, so as to make it a controllable and open health environment as far as possible.
【作者單位】： 浙江大學歷史系;
【分類號】：K092
本文編號：2359693
[Abstract]:"Public historiography" refers to the historical manifestation and dissemination of the public under the condition of reflecting on their own historical consciousness and the formation of historical cognition. With the rapid development of new media and the increasing demand for historical knowledge from the media, professional historians are faced with the choice of two ways: self-reflection and analysis of their own historical knowledge. The forming process of historical consciousness, making use of each other and becoming the participant or guide of "public historiography"; Or keep the "insider" and face only the professional identity, waiting for the public "outsiders" or laymen to improve themselves under the new mode of knowledge dissemination, and then be replaced. It is urgent to construct the subject of public history with the system and professional vision of academic discipline. On the basis of the research and analysis of the forming process of historical cognition, people can surpass the scattered nature of the theoretical design of the discipline construction of "public historiography" in foreign countries. At the same time, considering the trend of self-media communication, combining the four levels of ethics, historiography methodology, interdisciplinary communication and practical operation, the author designs the discipline framework. The public production and dissemination of historical knowledge can not only promote the social order and health, but also lead to social chaos and pathological changes. In the state of self-media communication, the "history" double-edged sword function can be quickly changed in a very short time. Therefore, it is necessary to make strategic thinking on public participation in the production and dissemination of historical knowledge, so as to make it a controllable and open health environment as far as possible.
【作者單位】： 浙江大學歷史系;
【分類號】：K092
【共引文獻】
相關期刊論文 前3條
1 周筱峗,葛劍雄;“古為今用”:歷史研究還是歷史應用[J];學術界;2004年03期
2 吳漫;20世紀后半葉史學社會功能探討的得與失[J];中州學刊;2004年04期
3 徐國利;關于新時期史學與現實關系討論的回顧與總結[J];淮北煤炭師范學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2004年01期
相關博士學位論文 前2條
1 王曉華;近三十年中國大陸史學主潮研究[D];山東大學;2007年
2 王松山;兩晉史學發(fā)展特征研究[D];吉林大學;2007年
相關碩士學位論文 前1條
1 李琳娟;1983年—中國新時期史學的轉變[D];山東大學;2006年
【二級參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前2條
1 蔣保;影視史學芻議[J];安徽史學;2004年05期
2 王加豐;“理解”:二十世紀西方歷史學的追求[J];歷史研究;2001年03期
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 羅蘭;;發(fā)掘真相比說真話更重要——陳明遠先生訪談錄[J];社會科學論壇;2011年02期
2 ;[J];;年期
3 ;[J];;年期
4 ;[J];;年期
5 ;[J];;年期
6 ;[J];;年期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
相關碩士學位論文 前1條
1 郎需穎;美國公眾史學運動簡論[D];復旦大學;2010年
，本文編號：2359693
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/sxll/2359693.html
