【摘要】：日本的學(xué)院派史學(xué)自形成之日起至今,一直堅(jiān)持著實(shí)證主義研究方法,這一研究方法在今日呈現(xiàn)出諸多弊端,使得學(xué)院派史家無法承擔(dān)起"普世"與"經(jīng)世致用"的職責(zé)。為了彌補(bǔ)這一缺陷,"民間史家"應(yīng)運(yùn)而生。他們?cè)谘芯颗c著作風(fēng)格上與學(xué)院派史家存在明顯差異,代替學(xué)院派史家承擔(dān)起歷史學(xué)者應(yīng)盡的職責(zé),逐漸控制了歷史知識(shí)領(lǐng)域的話語權(quán),對(duì)日本民眾歷史認(rèn)識(shí)與歷史觀具有極大影響力。學(xué)院派史家與民間史家均有各自的優(yōu)勢(shì)與缺陷,互相取長(zhǎng)補(bǔ)短,在競(jìng)爭(zhēng)中互相促進(jìn)是日本史學(xué)發(fā)展的最佳途徑。改進(jìn)的核心目標(biāo)應(yīng)當(dāng)是勇于承擔(dān)歷史學(xué)家"求真普世""學(xué)以致用"的職責(zé)。
[Abstract]:Since its formation, Japanese academic historiography has been adhering to positivist research method, which presents many disadvantages today, which makes academic historians unable to undertake the duties of "universal world" and "practical application". In order to make up for this defect, "folk historian" came into being. They are obviously different from academic historians in their research and writing style. Instead of academic historians, they take on the duties of historians and gradually control the right to speak in the field of historical knowledge. It has great influence on the Japanese people's historical understanding and historical view. Academic historians and folk historians both have their own advantages and disadvantages, learn from each other and promote each other in the competition is the best way for the development of Japanese historiography. The core goal of improvement should be to take on the responsibility of historians to "seek truth and make use of learning".
【作者單位】： 南開大學(xué)日本研究院;
【分類號(hào)】：K093.13

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 文青;檔案、歷史源流辨[J];湘潭大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1990年02期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 王曉秋 北京大學(xué)歷史學(xué)系教授;歷史豈能任意顛覆[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

2 宋京整理;最新美國歷史研究動(dòng)向[N];社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2002年

，

本文編號(hào)：2341597