【摘要】：作為分析的馬克思主義學(xué)派的創(chuàng)始人與領(lǐng)軍人物,柯亨對(duì)唯物史觀的研究改變了英美地區(qū)學(xué)術(shù)圈對(duì)馬克思主義所持的冷漠態(tài)度,同時(shí)也使唯物史觀重新成為西方馬克思主義學(xué)術(shù)研究的一項(xiàng)重要內(nèi)容�？潞鄬�(duì)唯物史觀基本概念和原理所做的厘清有其貢獻(xiàn),對(duì)唯物史觀的解釋也有缺陷,尤其是他在規(guī)律觀問題上否認(rèn)唯物史觀所揭示的是因果必然性規(guī)律,而認(rèn)為是一種功能解釋。正是由于存在解讀上的缺陷,柯亨晚年對(duì)他為之辯護(hù)的唯物史觀的可信性產(chǎn)生了動(dòng)搖。
[Abstract]:As the founder and leader of the Marxist school of analysis, Koheng's study of historical materialism has changed the apathy of British and American academic circles towards Marxism. At the same time, historical materialism has become an important part of western Marxist academic research. Ke Heng's clarification of the basic concepts and principles of historical materialism has its contribution and its interpretation of historical materialism is flawed, especially when he denies that historical materialism reveals the law of causality in the view of law. It is thought to be a functional explanation. It is because of the defects in interpretation that Ke Heng wavered in his later years on the credibility of the historical materialism he defended.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院世界歷史研究所;
【分類號(hào)】：K0;A811

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄭憶石;;科學(xué)、知識(shí)、知識(shí)分子:分析的馬克思主義社會(huì)發(fā)展動(dòng)力論域[J];浙江學(xué)刊;2011年04期

2 ;[J];;年期

3 ;[J];;年期

4 ;[J];;年期

5 ;[J];;年期

6 ;[J];;年期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 特約記者 吳英;柯亨對(duì)馬克思?xì)v史理論的研究[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2310242