再論中國古典學(xué)重建問題——以列子時(shí)代考訂與《列子》八篇真?zhèn)沃鏋槔?/H1>
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-03 20:51
【摘要】：自1935年5月馮友蘭陸續(xù)闡發(fā)的"信古、疑古、釋古"說,曾在中國學(xué)術(shù)界引發(fā)長期的爭議,并直接影響到20世紀(jì)90年代以來中國古典學(xué)理論的建構(gòu)。從中國學(xué)術(shù)史上有關(guān)列子時(shí)代考訂和《列子》八篇的真?zhèn)沃?可以清晰地看出,除了明清民國時(shí)期,存在極端疑古的不良傾向外,總體而論,從信中有疑到考而后疑與考而后信兩種傾向并存,"信"與"疑"始終沒有呈現(xiàn)出絕對的分離狀態(tài)。簡單地將"信"和"疑"對立起來,注定很難準(zhǔn)確揭示出紛繁復(fù)雜的古史、古書的歷史實(shí)際,自然也很難談到在真實(shí)可信的史料基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)行古典學(xué)重建問題。新時(shí)期學(xué)術(shù)界關(guān)于浙大簡、清華簡、北大簡真?zhèn)蔚募ち艺撧q,為新時(shí)期中國古典學(xué)的重建問題提出一極有價(jià)值的啟示:對古史古書的審查,是重建古典學(xué)的基礎(chǔ),不對新舊史料進(jìn)行科學(xué)的"澄濾",曲解與割裂信古、疑古、釋古之間的關(guān)系,必會將中國古典學(xué)重建引向新的誤區(qū)。
[Abstract]:Since May 1935, Feng Youlan's theory of "believing in ancient times, doubting ancient times, explaining ancient times" has aroused a long controversy in Chinese academic circles, and has directly influenced the construction of Chinese classical theory since the 1990s. It is clear from the textual research in the history of Chinese academic studies on the period of the "Lenzi" and the identification of the authenticity of the eight articles that apart from the period of the Ming and the Republic of China, there was a tendency to be extremely suspicious of the ancient times, generally speaking, There are two tendencies from doubt in letter to doubt after examination and belief after examination, and there is no absolute separation between "trust" and "doubt". Simply putting "trust" and "doubt" against each other, it is doomed that it is difficult to reveal the complicated and complicated ancient history accurately. The historical reality of ancient books is also difficult to talk about the reconstruction of classical studies on the basis of authentic and credible historical data. The fierce debate in the academic circles of Zhejiang University, Qinghua Bamboo slips and Peking University on the truth and falsehood of the bamboo slips in the new era provides a valuable inspiration for the reconstruction of Chinese classical studies in the new era: the review of ancient books on ancient history is the basis for the reconstruction of classical studies. Without the scientific "clear filtering" of the new and the old historical materials, the relationship between the misinterpretation and the separation of the ancient times, the doubt of the ancient times, and the interpretation of the ancient times will lead to new misunderstandings in the reconstruction of Chinese classical science.
【作者單位】： 蘇州大學(xué)社會學(xué)院;
【分類號】：K092
，
本文編號：2309011
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/sxll/2309011.html
[Abstract]:Since May 1935, Feng Youlan's theory of "believing in ancient times, doubting ancient times, explaining ancient times" has aroused a long controversy in Chinese academic circles, and has directly influenced the construction of Chinese classical theory since the 1990s. It is clear from the textual research in the history of Chinese academic studies on the period of the "Lenzi" and the identification of the authenticity of the eight articles that apart from the period of the Ming and the Republic of China, there was a tendency to be extremely suspicious of the ancient times, generally speaking, There are two tendencies from doubt in letter to doubt after examination and belief after examination, and there is no absolute separation between "trust" and "doubt". Simply putting "trust" and "doubt" against each other, it is doomed that it is difficult to reveal the complicated and complicated ancient history accurately. The historical reality of ancient books is also difficult to talk about the reconstruction of classical studies on the basis of authentic and credible historical data. The fierce debate in the academic circles of Zhejiang University, Qinghua Bamboo slips and Peking University on the truth and falsehood of the bamboo slips in the new era provides a valuable inspiration for the reconstruction of Chinese classical studies in the new era: the review of ancient books on ancient history is the basis for the reconstruction of classical studies. Without the scientific "clear filtering" of the new and the old historical materials, the relationship between the misinterpretation and the separation of the ancient times, the doubt of the ancient times, and the interpretation of the ancient times will lead to new misunderstandings in the reconstruction of Chinese classical science.
【作者單位】： 蘇州大學(xué)社會學(xué)院;
【分類號】：K092
，
本文編號：2309011
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/sxll/2309011.html
最近更新
教材專著
