顧頡剛致羅根澤信札十通
發(fā)布時間:2018-08-12 10:16
【摘要】:湖南圖書館藏有顧頡剛致羅根澤親筆信函十通,寫作年代大致為1932年至1935年間。信札中顧頡剛就《古史辨》的選題內容、編纂體例、校稿審核、出版發(fā)行、經(jīng)費來源等諸多細節(jié)與羅根澤往復討論,如是否選入章太炎、胡適治經(jīng)治子之方法異同,是否摘抄胡適《中國哲學史大綱》、蔡元培《中國倫理學史》等書中有關諸子研究的代表性觀點等等,既表明顧頡剛先生《古史辨》編纂中重視鑒別和吸收晚近興起的哲學、史學、社會學新知識理論的現(xiàn)代性史學思想,也反映出國難當頭、時局紛擾下學者苦心孤詣,延續(xù)學術文脈的勇氣和艱難情形。
[Abstract]:There are ten letters written by Gu Jiegang to Luo Genze in Hunan Library, which were written from 1932 to 1935. In the letter, Gu Jiegang discussed with Luo Genze many details about the content of the topic, compilation style, review and approval of manuscripts, publication and distribution, source of funds, etc., such as whether to choose Zhang Taiyan or Hu Shi to treat his children. Whether or not to copy the representative viewpoints on the studies of the philosophers in Hu Shi's outline of Chinese philosophy, Cai Yuanpei's History of Chinese Ethics, and so on, shows that the compilation of Gu Gang's Ancient History shows that he attaches importance to the identification and absorption of the philosophy that has arisen recently. The modern historiography thought of historiography and new knowledge theory of sociology also reflects the courage and difficulty of the academic context.
【作者單位】: 湖南圖書館歷史文獻部;
【分類號】:K092
,
本文編號:2178750
[Abstract]:There are ten letters written by Gu Jiegang to Luo Genze in Hunan Library, which were written from 1932 to 1935. In the letter, Gu Jiegang discussed with Luo Genze many details about the content of the topic, compilation style, review and approval of manuscripts, publication and distribution, source of funds, etc., such as whether to choose Zhang Taiyan or Hu Shi to treat his children. Whether or not to copy the representative viewpoints on the studies of the philosophers in Hu Shi's outline of Chinese philosophy, Cai Yuanpei's History of Chinese Ethics, and so on, shows that the compilation of Gu Gang's Ancient History shows that he attaches importance to the identification and absorption of the philosophy that has arisen recently. The modern historiography thought of historiography and new knowledge theory of sociology also reflects the courage and difficulty of the academic context.
【作者單位】: 湖南圖書館歷史文獻部;
【分類號】:K092
,
本文編號:2178750
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/sxll/2178750.html