【摘要】：19世紀的歷史主義思潮對啟蒙時期以來的歷史理論,特別是作為集大成的黑格爾思辨歷史哲學進行了全面批判,但是這種批判仍然是不徹底的和未完成的。在歷史世界觀方面,他們從某種最初作為出發(fā)點的永恒的個性出發(fā)來理解和解釋歷史,沒有回到人們實際理解歷史的現(xiàn)實過程中,其歷史思維仍然是半截的、獨斷的。在歷史目的論方面,他們無法逃避歷史的統(tǒng)一性問題,最后只能依靠非歷史的因素構(gòu)造世界史的統(tǒng)一,走向人的歷史性存在的反面。在歷史方法論層面,歷史詮釋學遺忘了"此在的前結(jié)構(gòu)"在此在的一切認識活動中的重要地位,把歷史對象當作一種現(xiàn)成的事物來對待,仍然是一種非歷史性的理解。
[Abstract]:The historical trend of thought in the 19th century criticizes the historical theory since the Enlightenment, especially Hegel's speculative historical philosophy, but the criticism is incomplete and incomplete. In the aspect of historical world outlook, they understand and explain history from some kind of eternal personality that is the starting point at first, and they do not return to the realistic process of people's actual understanding of history, and their historical thinking is still half and arbitrary. In the aspect of historical teleology, they can not escape the unity of history, and finally they can only rely on non-historical factors to construct the unity of world history and move towards the opposite of the historical existence of human beings. In the aspect of historical methodology, historical hermeneutics forgets the important position of "the former structure of this being" in all the cognitive activities, and it is still a kind of non-historical understanding to treat the historical object as a ready-made thing.
【作者單位】： 東北師范大學馬克思主義學部;
【基金】：教育部人文社會科學重點研究基地重大項目(13JJD720009)
【分類號】：K01
，

本文編號：2126927