本文選題：史學(xué)類型 + 文學(xué)形式��； 參考：《史學(xué)理論研究》2012年01期

【摘要】：凱斯·詹金斯和艾倫·穆斯洛將當(dāng)代西方史學(xué)界對于歷史學(xué)性質(zhì)問題的立場劃分為重構(gòu)主義、建構(gòu)主義、解構(gòu)主義三種分野。重構(gòu)主義強(qiáng)調(diào)歷史知識與過去實(shí)在相符合的客觀性與真理性,相信史家具有以歷史敘事的方式重建過去的技能;建構(gòu)主義主張歷史在根本層面上依舊是對過去的摹寫,但在經(jīng)驗(yàn)事實(shí)之外需要借助其他學(xué)科的理論和方法,以期實(shí)現(xiàn)對總體歷史的建構(gòu);解構(gòu)主義則指出了過去與歷史之間、真實(shí)與敘述之間、實(shí)在與語言之間聯(lián)結(jié)的脆弱性,主張以解構(gòu)歷史編纂學(xué)的方式透析過去如何被編制為各種歷史。這種史學(xué)類型的劃分本身即蘊(yùn)涵了后現(xiàn)代主義的基本理論立場與實(shí)際指涉,從中可以更加清晰地辨識其對歷史學(xué)性質(zhì)問題挑戰(zhàn)的核心范圍與思想取向。
[Abstract]:Keith Jenkins and Alan Mustello divided the contemporary western historians' position on the nature of history into three categories: reconstructivism constructivism and deconstruction. Reconstructionism emphasizes the objectivity and truth of historical knowledge and the reality of the past, and believes that historians have the skills to reconstruct the past in the way of historical narration, while constructivism advocates that history is still a copy of the past on the fundamental level. However, in addition to empirical facts, theories and methods of other disciplines are needed in order to construct the overall history. Deconstruction points out the fragility of the connection between the past and history, between reality and narration, between reality and language. To analyze how the past was compiled into various history by deconstructing historical codification. The classification of this type of history itself implies the basic theoretical position and practical implication of postmodernism, from which the core scope and ideological orientation of the challenge to the nature of history can be more clearly identified.
【作者單位】： 首都師范大學(xué)歷史學(xué)院;
【基金】：教育部人文社會科學(xué)研究基金資助項(xiàng)目“歷史學(xué)對后現(xiàn)代主義挑戰(zhàn)的回應(yīng)與分析”(項(xiàng)目批準(zhǔn)號09YJA770044)的階段性成果之一
【分類號】：K092

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 李偉國;講史、品史者之短長及其匡正[N];文匯報(bào);2007年

，

本文編號：2087427