本文選題：德國(guó)史學(xué) + 文化史編寫��； 參考：《西北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年06期

【摘要】：19世紀(jì)中葉以來(lái)德國(guó)社會(huì)發(fā)生了劇烈變化,實(shí)證主義思潮大行其道,史學(xué)界則出現(xiàn)了文化史編寫熱潮。文化史固然補(bǔ)充了傳統(tǒng)政治史研究的真空地帶,國(guó)際史壇上文化史亦狀態(tài)活躍,但德國(guó)文化史編寫仍面臨重重困境:除自身缺陷之外,還要面對(duì)政治史強(qiáng)有力的壓制,需要突破德國(guó)"歷史主義"主導(dǎo)下的學(xué)術(shù)氛圍與政治環(huán)境的雙重夾擊。因此,德國(guó)文化史發(fā)展的"先天不足"為德國(guó)傳統(tǒng)史學(xué)走向20世紀(jì)新史學(xué)轉(zhuǎn)型的艱難之路埋下伏筆。
[Abstract]:Since the middle of the 19th century, German society has undergone drastic changes, positivism is popular, and historiography has seen a cultural history writing boom. Although cultural history complements the vacuum zone of traditional political history research and the cultural history in international history is active, German cultural history still faces many difficulties: in addition to its own defects, it also faces the powerful suppression of political history. It is necessary to break through the double attack of academic atmosphere and political environment under German historicism. Therefore, the "innate deficiency" in the development of German cultural history lays the groundwork for the difficult transition of German traditional historiography to the new historiography in the 20th century.
【作者單位】： 西北大學(xué)歷史學(xué)院;
【基金】：教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)研究青年基金項(xiàng)目(17XJC770001)
【分類號(hào)】：K095.16

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 孫立新;山東大學(xué)歷史系舉行十六至十九世紀(jì)德國(guó)文化討論會(huì)[J];文史哲;1987年04期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 田一平;動(dòng)態(tài)的文化解釋[N];社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2002年

，

本文編號(hào)：2057920