本文選題：柯林武德 + 歷史認(rèn)識(shí)��； 參考：《東北師范大學(xué)》2006年碩士論文

【摘要】： 歷史認(rèn)識(shí)中的主客觀性問題一直是西方歷史哲學(xué)界爭(zhēng)論的焦點(diǎn),實(shí)證主義者認(rèn)為,歷史認(rèn)識(shí)不應(yīng)成為浪漫主義的臆測(cè)和虛構(gòu),歷史學(xué)家的任務(wù)是確立過去的事實(shí)并努力去解釋它們,由于歷史發(fā)展的過程和自然的過程在本質(zhì)上是一致的,因此自然科學(xué)的方法即實(shí)證的方法同樣可以運(yùn)用于歷史。人們有可能從歷史事實(shí)中發(fā)現(xiàn)規(guī)律,達(dá)到歷史認(rèn)識(shí)的客觀性,完全摒除了歷史認(rèn)識(shí)中的主觀性因素。相對(duì)主義者對(duì)實(shí)證主義者進(jìn)行了批判,認(rèn)為歷史認(rèn)識(shí)不是客觀的,歷史學(xué)家的主觀性起了決定作用。無(wú)論是單純強(qiáng)調(diào)歷史認(rèn)識(shí)中的客觀性或是主觀性都是片面的,都不能科學(xué)地認(rèn)識(shí)歷史。 柯林武德作為20世紀(jì)影響很大的歷史哲學(xué)家,他對(duì)于歷史認(rèn)識(shí)論的看法是值得研究的,他作為相對(duì)主義史學(xué)的代表人物,突出了歷史認(rèn)識(shí)的相對(duì)性,強(qiáng)調(diào)了歷史認(rèn)識(shí)主體的主體作用,但是他身上還有一些實(shí)證主義者的影子,他并不否定歷史認(rèn)識(shí)應(yīng)該從史料開始。他把歷史研究的對(duì)象定義為過去行動(dòng)者的思想,并主張?jiān)谛撵`中重演這些過去的思想,將認(rèn)識(shí)中的主客體統(tǒng)一在一起,并強(qiáng)調(diào)了主體的主觀性因素對(duì)歷史認(rèn)識(shí)的決定作用。他的歷史認(rèn)識(shí)主觀性思想是他歷史哲學(xué)的核心,對(duì)其進(jìn)行研究將有助于我們理清歷史認(rèn)識(shí)中的主客觀性之間的關(guān)系,對(duì)于我們科學(xué)地認(rèn)識(shí)歷史的本質(zhì),從而指導(dǎo)我們進(jìn)行歷史研究是有益的。
[Abstract]:The problem of subjective objectivity in historical cognition has always been the focus of controversy in western historical philosophy. The positivist believes that historical cognition should not become the conjecture and fiction of romanticism. The task of historians is to establish the facts of the past and try to explain them. Because the process of historical development and the process of nature are essentially the same, the methods of natural science, that is, empirical methods, can also be applied to history. It is possible for people to discover laws from historical facts to achieve the objectivity of historical cognition and to completely eliminate the subjective factors in historical cognition. The relativists criticize the positivists and think that historical cognition is not objective and the subjectivity of historians plays a decisive role. It is one-sided to emphasize objectivity or subjectivity in historical cognition. Neither can understand history scientifically. As a very influential historical philosopher in the 20th century, Collingwood's view on historical epistemology is worth studying. As a representative figure of relativism, he highlights the relativity of historical cognition. It emphasizes the main role of the subject of historical cognition, but he still has some positivistic shadow on him, and he does not deny that historical cognition should begin with historical materials. He defined the object of historical study as the thought of the past actors, and advocated repeating these past thoughts in the mind, unifying the subject and object in the cognition, and emphasizing the decisive effect of the subjective factor of the subject on the historical cognition. His subjective thought of historical cognition is the core of his philosophy of history. The study of it will help us to clarify the relationship between subjective objectivity in historical cognition, and to understand the essence of history scientifically. Therefore, it is beneficial to guide us in the study of history.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號(hào)】：K091

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蘇民;歷史認(rèn)識(shí)論中的主體[J];福建師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年01期

2 劉篤成,唐淮;西方歷史哲學(xué)的焦點(diǎn)——?dú)v史認(rèn)識(shí)的客觀性問題[J];國(guó)外社會(huì)科學(xué);2000年04期

3 張文杰;略論柯林武德的歷史重演論[J];河北師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1997年04期

4 胡輝華;柯林武德對(duì)歷史哲學(xué)發(fā)展的貢獻(xiàn)[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);1991年06期

5 張耕華;關(guān)于歷史認(rèn)識(shí)論的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];歷史研究;1995年04期

6 于沛;歷史認(rèn)識(shí):主體意識(shí)和主體的創(chuàng)造性[J];歷史研究;2003年01期

7 賈海濤;評(píng)柯林武德的《歷史的觀念》─—兼談歷史觀和歷史研究的方法[J];南京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1999年01期

8 陳宇光;柯林武德的歷史哲學(xué)與人性科學(xué)[J];社會(huì)科學(xué);1993年10期

9 胡大牛;柯林武德歷史哲學(xué)觀點(diǎn)評(píng)述[J];探索;1992年04期

10 于沛;史學(xué)的科學(xué)認(rèn)識(shí)功能和理論思維[J];史學(xué)理論研究;1992年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2026467