本文選題：史學建構(gòu) + 史料　； 參考：《福建論壇(人文社會科學版)》2017年08期

【摘要】："泛史料"意識下史料趨于文學化,這彌補了民史史料的缺乏甚至匱乏的現(xiàn)狀,是伴隨史家"眼光向下"的治史理念應(yīng)運而生的。在強調(diào)科學化、規(guī)范化的嚴謹分析模式下,合理的歷史想象、富于文學性的歷史敘事方法之勃興拓展了史學的傳播和影響力。文學化敘述描寫與科學化剖析解釋本不沖突矛盾,更無優(yōu)劣之分,均是史學構(gòu)建過程的兩個方面,史家因治史理念、側(cè)重等不同各有選擇,文史界限之存在自是必然,可言辭之使用則為共通,在維護史學本質(zhì)的基礎(chǔ)上或執(zhí)其一端或兼融相通,都應(yīng)被歷史研究所包容,畢竟多元方可能造就生機。
[Abstract]:Under the consciousness of "pan-historical materials", historical materials tend to be literary, which makes up for the lack or even lack of historical materials of the people, and comes into being with the historian's idea of "looking down". Under the rigorous analysis mode which emphasizes the scientific and standardized, the rational historical imagination and the flourishing of the literary historical narrative method expand the dissemination and influence of the historiography. The description of literary narration and the explanation of scientific analysis do not conflict with each other, let alone the advantages and disadvantages, are two aspects of the construction process of historiography. Historians have their own choices because of the idea and emphasis of managing history, so the existence of the boundary of literary history is inevitable. The use of words is common. On the basis of preserving the essence of historiography or holding its one end or both, it should be tolerated by the Institute of History, after all, pluralism may create vitality.
【作者單位】： 南開大學歷史學院;
【分類號】：K05

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條

1 吳錫平;史學的文學化表達之后[N];文藝報;2006年

2 王記錄 河南師范大學社會發(fā)展學院;警惕“歷史熱”庸俗化[N];中國社會科學報;2011年

，

本文編號：1910933