本文選題：宏觀歷史研究 + 二手材料��； 參考：《華南師范大學學報(社會科學版)》2011年06期

【摘要】：歷史研究中,原始材料的評價標準具有唯一性,而使用二手材料又是一個普遍的做法,尤其是單個史學家在社會需要、在全球史編撰等的相互作用下,面對無限的材料,必需借用二手材料進行宏觀歷史研究。要解決這一矛盾,要明確必需不是隨意,更不是濫用;其界限是適用于歷史理論和歷史思想的探索、宏觀歷史比較研究和大型綜合史書編撰三大領域。唯有如此,宏觀歷史研究才能在歷史理論和歷史比較以及歷史多樣化解釋等方面有所創(chuàng)新和貢獻,充分展現其史學意義,促進實現史學社會功能。宏觀歷史研究借用二手材料存在風險,借用必須以新意為依歸。通過堅持研究目標服從材料的原則,堅守學術規(guī)范等,防范風險還是有希望的。
[Abstract]:In the historical study, the evaluation standard of raw materials is unique, and the use of second-hand materials is a common practice, especially for a single historian in the social needs, under the interaction of the world history compilation, and in the face of unlimited materials, the use of second-hand materials must be used in the macro historical study. To solve this contradiction, it is necessary to make clear the necessity of not It is arbitrary and not abused; its boundary is the exploration of historical theory and historical thought, the comparative study of macro history and the compilation of large comprehensive history books in three fields. Only in this way, the study of macro history can make innovations and contributions in historical theory, historical comparison and historical interpretation, and fully display its historical meaning. It promotes the realization of the social function of historiography. Macro historical research borrows the risk of secondhand materials and borrows from the new meaning. By adhering to the principles of the research objectives, adhering to the academic standards and so on, the prevention of risk is still hopeful.

【作者單位】： 華南師范大學歷史文化學院;
【分類號】：K092

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 ;有關《李濟傳略》的兩封來信[J];晉陽學刊;1982年02期

2 鄧云鄉(xiāng);;民俗學的名與實[J];學術月刊;1993年08期

3 ;[J];;年期

4 ;[J];;年期

5 ;[J];;年期

6 ;[J];;年期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號：1888772