本文選題：傅斯年 + 史學(xué)思想��； 參考：《學(xué)術(shù)探索》2012年01期

【摘要】：近代史學(xué)大師傅斯年以客觀實(shí)證為其史學(xué)思想的核心。但傅斯年所倡導(dǎo)的治學(xué)理念本身及其與治學(xué)路向之間卻存在一定的矛盾性。這種矛盾性,既有其學(xué)術(shù)思想執(zhí)著的追求因素,也與其時(shí)代沖突影響和愛國(guó)情懷的價(jià)值取向有關(guān)。故應(yīng)辯證地看待傅斯年史學(xué)思想的矛盾性,注意充分吸取其合理成分。唯有這樣,才是我們對(duì)待傅斯年學(xué)術(shù)思想的正確態(tài)度。本文將對(duì)傅斯年史學(xué)思想的矛盾性表現(xiàn)及其根源進(jìn)行梳理和分析,并對(duì)其史學(xué)思想矛盾性的現(xiàn)實(shí)啟示和局限性予以簡(jiǎn)要陳述。
[Abstract]:Fu Sinian, a master of modern historiography, regards objective demonstration as the core of his historiography thought. However, there are some contradictions between the idea of scholarship and the direction of scholarship advocated by Fu Sinian. This contradiction is not only the pursuit factor of his academic thought, but also the influence of the conflict of his times and the value orientation of patriotic feelings. Therefore, it is necessary to dialectically treat the contradiction of Fu Sinian's historical thought and fully absorb its reasonable elements. Only in this way can we treat Fu Sinian's academic thought with the correct attitude. This paper will sort out and analyze the contradictory expression and origin of Fu Sinian's historiography thought, and briefly state the realistic enlightenment and limitation of the contradiction of his historiography thought.
【作者單位】： 宜賓學(xué)院馬克思主義學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：K092

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 張?zhí)?;發(fā)現(xiàn)史料之外的歷史——以傅斯年研究為例[J];近代史研究;2010年02期

2 楊春梅;;“用多元主義代替主觀主義”——傅斯年最后的思想遺囑[J];煙臺(tái)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年02期

3 呏咎，

本文編號(hào)：1878292