本文選題：制度　切入點(diǎn)：歷史　出處：《湖北社會科學(xué)》2017年06期

【摘要】：《歷史是被什么決定的》一文提出歷史決定論之后,很快引來一些文章的質(zhì)疑。其中的質(zhì)疑焦點(diǎn),主要集中在方法論、制度化社會賞罰與人們活動的關(guān)系、制度與生產(chǎn)力的關(guān)系和制度的來源這四個方面。盡管這些批判性的質(zhì)疑都有自己的理據(jù),但經(jīng)逐一分析后,還都不能對我的這套觀點(diǎn)形成有效威脅。不僅如此,它們還等于又從反面幫我證明了:歷史就是被制度決定的。
[Abstract]:After the historical determinism was put forward in the article "History is determined by what", some articles soon questioned it. The focus of questioning was mainly on methodology, the relationship between institutionalized social rewards and punishments and people's activities. The relationship between the system and the productive forces and the origin of the system. Although all these critical questions have their own grounds, after analyzing them one by one, none of them can pose an effective threat to this set of views of mine. They also help me prove that history is determined by the system.
【作者單位】： 華中科技大學(xué)哲學(xué)系;
【基金】：中央高校基本科研研究費(fèi)項(xiàng)目“歷史規(guī)律研究”(2017) 國家教育部人文社會科學(xué)一般項(xiàng)目“制度在社會歷史中的地位與作用”(14YJA720002)
【分類號】：K01
，

本文編號：1688286