現代社會中的權力與支配:基于分配視角的考察
發(fā)布時間:2018-09-18 14:05
【摘要】:從分配視角出發(fā),權力是稀缺的產物。稀缺使分配成為了必要,權力則產生于分配的行為與過程之中。分配可以采取設置一個分配者,由它決定所有社會剩余之歸屬的方式,也可以采取設置某種競爭規(guī)則,由社會成員通過競爭來獲取社會剩余的方式。在這兩種分配方式中,實踐性權力與制度性權力有著不同的功能與特征。實踐性權力的行使并不必然造成支配,只有當不存在退出選項時,實踐性權力關系才變成了支配關系。現代社會保障個體層面的退出自由,在很大程度上祛除了實踐性權力的支配性。結果,支配更多成為了制度性權力行使的結果。當集體決策中出現了永久少數,或授權決策中的授權決策者失去了中立性時,制度性權力就變成了一種支配性力量。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of distribution, power is the product of scarcity. Scarcity makes distribution necessary, while power comes from the behavior and process of distribution. Allocation can be done by setting a distributor, who decides the ownership of all the social residues, or by setting some kind of competition rules, in which the members of the society can obtain the social surplus through competition. In these two ways of distribution, practical power and institutional power have different functions and characteristics. The exercise of practical power does not necessarily lead to domination, only when there is no exit option, the practical power relationship becomes dominance. The freedom to withdraw from the individual level of modern social security, to a great extent, dispel the dominance of practical power. As a result, domination has become the result of the exercise of institutional power. When there is a permanent minority in collective decision-making, or the authorized decision maker loses its neutrality, institutional power becomes a dominant force.
【作者單位】: 南京大學政府管理學院;南京大學人文社會科學高級研究院;
【基金】:國家社會科學基金青年項目“治理能力現代化視閾下政府職能履行方式研究”(項目號:14 CZZ003)的階段性成果 江蘇服務型政府建設研究基地資助(NO.30916014110 & NO.30916013123)
【分類號】:D033;C912.3
本文編號:2248147
[Abstract]:From the perspective of distribution, power is the product of scarcity. Scarcity makes distribution necessary, while power comes from the behavior and process of distribution. Allocation can be done by setting a distributor, who decides the ownership of all the social residues, or by setting some kind of competition rules, in which the members of the society can obtain the social surplus through competition. In these two ways of distribution, practical power and institutional power have different functions and characteristics. The exercise of practical power does not necessarily lead to domination, only when there is no exit option, the practical power relationship becomes dominance. The freedom to withdraw from the individual level of modern social security, to a great extent, dispel the dominance of practical power. As a result, domination has become the result of the exercise of institutional power. When there is a permanent minority in collective decision-making, or the authorized decision maker loses its neutrality, institutional power becomes a dominant force.
【作者單位】: 南京大學政府管理學院;南京大學人文社會科學高級研究院;
【基金】:國家社會科學基金青年項目“治理能力現代化視閾下政府職能履行方式研究”(項目號:14 CZZ003)的階段性成果 江蘇服務型政府建設研究基地資助(NO.30916014110 & NO.30916013123)
【分類號】:D033;C912.3
【相似文獻】
相關碩士學位論文 前1條
1 張力毅;論通過契約實現的物之支配關系[D];南京大學;2013年
,本文編號:2248147
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/shgj/2248147.html
教材專著