【摘要】：我對王建疆教授提出的主義及別現(xiàn)代的學術(shù)問題還有兩點評論需要補充。首先,西方的主義,包括運動、時尚、風格等,都是與現(xiàn)實需求和時代變化緊密聯(lián)系并形成了牢固的扭結(jié)。主義總是以設(shè)立對立面并在競爭中勝出為己任的,因此,沒有一個可以永遠統(tǒng)治的主義。這一點,通過表現(xiàn)主義、法蘭克福學派和�？�,我們可以看到。其次,從世界范圍內(nèi)講,脫胎于第三世界的中國,因為它已經(jīng)有了立足于時代和現(xiàn)實需求而建立主義的意識,因而很有可能構(gòu)成當今世界哲學(而非軍事)的四邊形之一邊。這就如18、19世紀德國、法國的思想形成和發(fā)展所顯示的那樣。王建疆教授的問題觸到了我思想意識深處的神經(jīng)痛點,我們可以開始有意識地思考他提出的問題以及由他提出的問題所生發(fā)出來的更多的問題,盡管這些問題哪些與我們相關(guān),怎樣與我們相關(guān),以及如何與我們相關(guān),可能一時還不清楚,但我肯定他的問題一定與我們所有的人密切相關(guān)。
[Abstract]:I have two comments to add to Professor Wang Jianjiang's theory and other modern academic issues. First of all, Western doctrine, including sports, fashion, style and so on, is closely related to realistic needs and changes of the times and forms a firm kink. Doctrine is always about setting up opposites and winning in competition, so there is no doctrine that can rule forever. This can be seen through expressionism, the Frankfurt School, and Foucault. Secondly, from the perspective of the world, China was born out of the third World, because it has the consciousness of building on the needs of the times and reality, so it is likely to form one of the quadrilateral sides of the philosophy (not the military) of the world today. This was shown by the formation and development of ideas in 1819 th century Germany and France. Professor Wang Jianjiang's questions touch the nerve pain in the depths of my mind. We can start to think consciously about his questions and the more questions that arise from his questions, even though these questions are relevant to us. It may not be clear how and how we relate to us, but I'm sure his question must be relevant to all of us.
【作者單位】： 斯洛文尼亞科學與人文科學研究院哲學所;南通職業(yè)技術(shù)大學外語系;上海師范大學;
【分類號】：K02
，

本文編號：2137069