本文選題：機制解釋 + 社會學方法論　； 參考：《社會學評論》2017年06期

【摘要】：針對近年來正在成為一種呼聲的以機制為核心的社會學解釋,本文厘清了機制解釋興起的理論背景及其概念內(nèi)涵,并概括了機制解釋的三個核心特征:說明項與被說明項之間反復發(fā)生的事件過程,因果結(jié)構(gòu)的多元性以及方法論上的個人主義。然而,在機制解釋的實踐中卻出現(xiàn)了過度決定、忽視結(jié)構(gòu)性因素以及因果一般性確認等困境。面對機制解釋困境,本文從《儒法國家:中國歷史的新理論》一書的方法論意義出發(fā),分析其"宏觀結(jié)構(gòu)指引下機制研究"的方法論取向是如何超越傳統(tǒng)機制解釋困境的。
[Abstract]:In view of the theory background and conceptual connotation of mechanism explanation, which is becoming a kind of sociological explanation with mechanism as the core in recent years, this paper clarifies the theoretical background of the rise of mechanism interpretation. It also summarizes the three core features of mechanism explanation: the recurring event process between the declarative item and the explained item, the multiplicity of causality structure and the individualism in methodology. However, in the practice of mechanism interpretation, there are many difficulties, such as overdetermination, neglect of structural factors and general confirmation of causality. In the face of the dilemma of mechanism interpretation, this paper starts from the methodological significance of the book "Confucianism and Law country: new Theory of Chinese History", and analyzes how its methodological orientation of "Mechanism Research under the guidance of Macro-structure" surpasses the dilemma of traditional mechanism interpretation.
【作者單位】： 香港大學社會學系;
【分類號】：C91

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 張二遠;;儒法道釋的融合與個體的和諧存在[J];保定學院學報;2008年01期

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 蘭州大學哲學社會學院博士 郭吉軍;略論先秦儒法思想中的交往倫理觀[N];甘肅日報;2012年

，

本文編號：2100159