本文關(guān)鍵詞：王念孫與《讀淮南子雜志書后》研究，，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

網(wǎng)友bazhan333737近日為您收集整理了關(guān)于王念孫與《讀淮南子雜志書后》研究（文學(xué)）的文檔，希望對(duì)您的工作和學(xué)習(xí)有所幫助。以下是文檔介紹：The Research of Wang-Niansun and The Preface of HuainanziA Dissertation Submitted tothe Graduate School of Henan Universityin Partial Fulfillment of the Requirementsfor the Degree ofMaster of ArtsByXu-ShengliSupervisor: Prof.Ding-XixiaDate:March,2013I摘要考據(jù)學(xué)於乾嘉時(shí)期達(dá)到頂峰,究其原因,清代優(yōu)秀考據(jù)學(xué)家有一個(gè)普遍的共識(shí),即要把文字、音韻、訓(xùn)詁、版本、目錄、�？钡葘W(xué)科融匯貫通。訓(xùn)詁,始於經(jīng)籍時(shí)代愈古,晦澀難懂,訓(xùn)釋以求其隱晦之本義;�？�,亦始於經(jīng)籍時(shí)代愈古,流傳中訛誤錯(cuò)亂橫生,經(jīng)籍遂失本來(lái)面目而本義隱矣。二者殊途同歸,是以經(jīng)學(xué)家、小學(xué)家欲訓(xùn)詁,則先校勘以求所據(jù)之本無(wú)誤,�？苯y(tǒng)於訓(xùn)詁學(xué)著作之中而歸於“小學(xué)”一門。王念孫《讀書雜誌》作爲(wèi)乾嘉學(xué)術(shù)名著,即很好地踐行了這一主張。然今人多述其訓(xùn)詁學(xué)成就,而忽視其在�？睂W(xué)方面的貢獻(xiàn)。不述其具體之�？被�(來(lái)源：[])動(dòng),則無(wú)以明其訓(xùn)詁何以成其大,亦無(wú)以明其爲(wèi)學(xué)之淵源所自。今姑以是書《讀淮南子雜誌書後》一文爲(wèi)例,對(duì)其兩類六十二事�？睏l例系統(tǒng)進(jìn)行研究。本文分六個(gè)部分:第一部分緒論,主要論述《讀書雜誌》的成書、作者、研究現(xiàn)狀以及本文的選題意義。第二部分從歷時(shí)和共時(shí)兩個(gè)層面分析清代�？睂W(xué)發(fā)達(dá)的原因。第三部分述《讀淮南子雜誌書後》主要內(nèi)容:寫作緣起及性質(zhì)、版本選擇及源流、�？背晒偨Y(jié)。第四部分探究《讀淮南子雜誌書後》之校勘系統(tǒng),分六十二事之分類標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、六十二事之條目構(gòu)成、六十二事辯證、六十二事整理表(附表)幾個(gè)方面予以論述。第五部分從校勘之目的及目標(biāo)、校勘之範(fàn)圍、校改之原則、�？敝椒�、�？敝再|(zhì)五個(gè)方面,將王念孫與戴震、段玉裁、顧千里、盧文弨等校勘學(xué)家進(jìn)行比較,以見王念孫�？睂W(xué)之特色。關(guān)鍵詞:王念孫、《讀淮南子雜誌書後》、六十二事、校勘學(xué)IIIABSTRACTThe textology reaches its unprecedented prime in Qian-Jia period, due to the (來(lái)源：[])reason, the excellentTextual Criticism master in the Qing Dynasty,has a general consensus that should master these disciplinessuch as sphilology, phonology, exegesis, version, bibliography, Textual Criticism.When a book hascirculated for a long time and e obscure, the exegetical practice began to explain the originalmeaning. Same as the former, when a book has had a lot of mistakes and their original meanings have beenconcealed also,the collation b(來(lái)源：[])egan to try to restore its original appearance. Both the same thing, the expertsabout classical studies and Xiao-xue, who want to engage in exegetical activities,should firstly collate andreduce errors in the book as much as possible. Therefore, collation is included in the works ahoutexegesis,and attributed to the “Xiao-xue”. As Qian-jia academic masterpiece, Dushuzazhi keeps the essfully.But many people only describe the achievement of its exeges(來(lái)源：[])is, while ignore its achievementsin the aspects of Textual Criticism. If you don’t describe its specific collated activities, it could’t explainwhy he has made great achievements in the exegesis,and could’t understand his academic origins.Now, wewill study the collated system about Sixty-two Rules from The Preface of Huainanzi.The paper has six parts: Part I is the introduction , introduce the book, its author, current researchand the significance (來(lái)源：[])of the topic of this paper. Part II, analysis of the diachronic reasons and onditiona that it is developed in the Qing dynasty. Part III, the main content of The Preface ofHuainanzi:the resaon and nature of the writing, the selection and origin among those different versions,thesummary about collated results. Part IV, Explore its Textual Criticism system which includes the criteria

12>

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：王念孫與《讀淮南子雜志書后》研究，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。