本文關(guān)鍵詞：陳渠珍與湘西自治（1921-1936），由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

陳渠珍與湘西自治（1921-1936）

陳渠珍與湘西自治（1921-1936）

本文以發(fā)生在一九二零年代和三零年代湘西以地方軍閥陳渠珍為主導(dǎo)的自治運(yùn)動(dòng)為談?wù)搶?duì)象。首先依據(jù)相關(guān)的檔案、陳渠珍的遺文以及湘西各縣的文史資料,試圖復(fù)原和重建湘西自治的史實(shí),在此基礎(chǔ)上就若干不足展開討論。本文指出,由于這個(gè)時(shí)期的國家政權(quán)沒有能力維持政治秩序,掌握社會(huì)權(quán)力的地方精英,乘機(jī)侵奪了國家合法權(quán)力；又由于民國以來的地方精英與國家權(quán)力之間的制度性聯(lián)系管道已經(jīng)喪失,其權(quán)力的傳統(tǒng)合法性資源已經(jīng)不復(fù)存在,為了消除其各種外在勢(shì)力的威脅,加強(qiáng)其統(tǒng)治區(qū)內(nèi)的凝聚力,他們從地方主義、民族主義和對(duì)現(xiàn)代化的追求等方面來為自身統(tǒng)治提供合法性依據(jù),顯示了現(xiàn)代中國政治權(quán)威多碩博在線論文網(wǎng)化的發(fā)展趨向�？v觀那個(gè)年代的地方自治狀況,地方軍閥除了關(guān)心地盤的維持和軍事實(shí)力的鞏固以外,也存在著尋求一條挽救中國危機(jī)的道路的良好愿望和開啟民智追求社會(huì)的文明和進(jìn)步的良苦用心。湘西自治不是真正的近代意 義的民治。陳渠珍的地方自治雖然襲用了西方地方自治的名義和某些形式,但其精神內(nèi)涵實(shí)際上仍是儒家的道德教化和社會(huì)倫理,體現(xiàn)了傳統(tǒng)士大夫修齊治平的理想,與真正近代意 義上的人民自決自主和參政議政的“地方自治”有很大的區(qū)別。陳渠珍所處的時(shí)代,正是國家權(quán)威衰微不振的時(shí)代。這樣的時(shí)代環(huán)境為統(tǒng)治一方的地方精英的出現(xiàn)提供了相對(duì)寬松的政治條件。但湘西自治是有限的相對(duì)自治,湘西自治是在軍閥混戰(zhàn)的復(fù)雜背景下開展的。湘西地方自治是近代中國從國家權(quán)威衰微向國家權(quán)威再建過渡的歷史時(shí)期的產(chǎn)物。

【Abstract】 This thesis discusses the Xiangxi autonomy movement, led by the local warlords of Chen Quzhen in the 1920s and 1930s. It analyzes the relevant files, the legatary documents of Chen Quzhen and historical data of different counties of Xiangxi, tries to reconstruct and rebuilt the history of Xiangxi autonomy movement, and to discuss relevant issues.This thesis points out, on one hand, the state political power at that time was unable to maintain political order, therefore, the local elites which controlled the social power, took the opportunity to trespass the legitimate power of the state. On the other hand, since the founding of the Republic of China, the institutional contact between the elites and the state power had ceased, the traditional and legitimate resources of power had declined, the elites needed to strengthen the forces of their regency to eliminate the threat of other external forces. They relied on the localism, nationalism and modernism to provide legality for their reign. This shows the diversified development trend of the political authority of contemporary China.When examining the situation of autonomy of that period of time comprehensively, one can find that the local warlords not only care about the maintain of their own region, the strengthen of their military forces, but they also make the good wish and try their best to search a way to save the crisis of their country, to enlighten the masses of people and to develop and progress the civilization.The concept of the autonomy of Xiangxi is not the same as the contemporary sense, which means a place is governed by its people. The autonomy of Xinagxi led by Chen Quzhen, although took over the name and some forms from modern Western, the spiritual essence is still Confucian. That is, to educate and civilize people with morality and ethics, which embodies the ideal of the traditional scholar-bureaucrat, to cultivate oneself well helps to harmony a family, and only after that, a country can be stable and peaceful. Therefore, this conception is quite different from the contemporary sense of autonomy, which means people have the right to make decisions, participate in politics to govern a place.Chen Quzhen lived at the time when China was on the decline, the authority was at its weak point. The historical background provided relatively loose environment for the coming up of the elites. The range of Xiangxi autonomy was limited. It was carried out under the complex background of the warlord era. Therefore, it is the outcome of the contemporary China, which experienced the transition from authority decline to authority rebuilt.

更多論文推薦: 各專業(yè)論文 海量論文下載

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：陳渠珍與湘西自治（1921-1936），，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。