本文選題：申池 + 齊國(guó)苑囿��； 參考：《管子學(xué)刊》2005年02期

【摘要】：“申池”是齊國(guó)苑囿,魏晉以來(lái),遺址失考。由于杜預(yù)一個(gè)“疑是齊都申門(mén)左右水池”的猜測(cè),后來(lái)編入《康熙字典》《辭源》據(jù)以為真,遂成定論。根據(jù)《史記》《左傳》《孟子》等大量相關(guān)資料的分析,實(shí)際地理位置環(huán)境條件、地方和村落名稱、地下發(fā)掘等因素的多方考證,證明這一結(jié)論是錯(cuò)誤的�！吧瓿亍笔且粋�(gè)頗具規(guī)模的苑囿,在當(dāng)時(shí)的時(shí)水——現(xiàn)在烏河上游,以臨淄區(qū)鳳凰鎮(zhèn)申橋?yàn)橹行牡姆綀A數(shù)十里的烏河流域地帶。
[Abstract]:Shenchi is a park of Qi. Since Wei and Jin dynasties, the ruins have been lost. Due to du's conjecture of "suspected to be the left and right pool of Qidushenmen", it was later compiled into the "Kangxi Dictionary" and "the source of ci" was thought to be true, so it came to a conclusion. According to the analysis of a large number of related data, such as the Historical Records, Zuo Zhuan, Mencius, and so on, and the multiple textual research on the actual geographical location and environment conditions, local and village names, underground excavations, etc., this conclusion is proved to be wrong. "Shenchi" is a considerable scale of the garden, at that time the water-now the upper reaches of the Wu River, Linzi District Fenghuangzhen Shenqiao as the center of the Wuhe River basin for dozens of miles.
【作者單位】： 淄博師范高等�？茖W(xué)校
【分類號(hào)】：K928.6

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王秀亮;“申池”考辨[J];管子學(xué)刊;2005年02期

2 ;[J];;年期

3 ;[J];;年期

4 ;[J];;年期

5 ;[J];;年期

6 ;[J];;年期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：2116945