本文選題：地方精英 + 文化生態(tài)園�。� 參考：《民俗研究》2016年03期

【摘要】：位于福建省泉州市南部的"聚寶城南",是市政府規(guī)劃的"閩南文化生態(tài)區(qū)"的一個試點項目。在實地田野調查的基礎上,探討聚寶城南在泉州城市化中的歷史隱喻以及"文化生態(tài)區(qū)"的前景及其與"美麗社區(qū)""美好生活"概念的關系。更重要的是,通過當?shù)氐亩际谢M程及地方生活世界的民族志來揭示當?shù)鼐⑹鲋?文化生態(tài)"口號的真意。從中我們可以發(fā)現(xiàn),在聚寶城南,當?shù)厝说纳钍澜缡怯扇伺c人、人與神、人與物諸人文關系構成的整體。這一生活世界包含的符號和實踐系統(tǒng)與文化生態(tài)園區(qū)設計中的所謂"文化生態(tài)"之間存在著鮮明差異,所謂的"文化生態(tài)",缺乏生活世界的整體性認知。
[Abstract]:Located in the south of Quanzhou City, Fujian Province, Jubao City is a pilot project of the Minnan Cultural and Ecological Zone, which is planned by the municipal government. On the basis of field investigation, this paper probes into the historical metaphor of Jubaochengnan in the urbanization of Quanzhou, the prospect of "cultural ecological zone" and its relationship with the concept of "beautiful community" and "good life". More importantly, through the process of local urbanization and the ethnography of the local living world, the true meaning of the slogan "cultural ecology" in the narration of the local elite is revealed. It can be found that in the south of Jubao City, the life world of local people is a whole composed of human beings, human beings and gods, people and things. There is a clear difference between the symbol and practice system contained in this life world and the so-called "cultural ecology" in the design of the cultural ecological park. The so-called "cultural ecology" lacks the holistic cognition of the life world.
【作者單位】： 北京大學社會學人類學研究所;倫敦大學學院;
【分類號】：K901
，

本文編號：1950891