本文選題：古代 + 洛陽都城��； 參考：《陜西師范大學(xué)》2005年博士論文

【摘要】：本文以古代洛陽都城空間為核心,從“國家—空間—社會(huì)”的視角,對夏宋間的洛陽都城空間形成演變狀況及其機(jī)制進(jìn)行了論述。內(nèi)容上沒有采取面面俱到的方式,而是以歷代王朝建立后所要解決的都城空間建設(shè)的四大基本共同問題(都城選址、政治中樞的建立、都城社會(huì)系統(tǒng)的控制、都城經(jīng)濟(jì)生活中心的建構(gòu))和中國古代都城空間模式三大結(jié)構(gòu)單元(宮城、里坊、市場)為核心。在此基礎(chǔ)上,對古代洛陽都城空間與中國古代都城空間模式之關(guān)系進(jìn)行了討論。 首先考察了古代洛陽的都城建置。在前輩學(xué)者古都定義的基礎(chǔ)上,借鑒現(xiàn)代政治學(xué)相關(guān)研究成果,提出了衡量古都的具體標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以及西周實(shí)行多都多都并存并重制、偃師商城和唐東都洛陽都級動(dòng)態(tài)變化等觀點(diǎn),在此基礎(chǔ)上,重新考定了洛陽在古代的具體建都朝代與年代,得出了新的結(jié)論。 在確定了本文討論中心“洛陽都城空間”的時(shí)間界域和特征后,對古代建都洛陽的原因,進(jìn)行了相當(dāng)全面的論述。對以往認(rèn)識較為粗略的周公“天下之中”說的考察,明確提出了周公“天下之中”說是中國古代第一個(gè)較系統(tǒng)的建都理論,其內(nèi)容包括地理、政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)和文化等4個(gè)方面的內(nèi)容,它不僅構(gòu)成了歷朝建都洛陽的獨(dú)特理路的基礎(chǔ)和神圣性、合理性的依據(jù),而且還發(fā)展引伸出“擇中立宮”和“擇宮之中軸線立朝”觀念和制度,對后世王朝選址建都及都城空間結(jié)構(gòu)形態(tài)規(guī)劃布局產(chǎn)生了重大影響。 有關(guān)宮城的討論,是本文著墨較多的部分,分兩個(gè)方面展開。一是討論宮城的歷史過程及階段特征,以說明古代都城的核心空間是怎樣形成,又是在何種背景下進(jìn)行重構(gòu)的。二是討論宮城的形成與階段性變動(dòng)對古代都城空間形態(tài)結(jié)構(gòu)的影響。通過討論,提出我國古代都城的最早形態(tài)是“非城郭形態(tài)”宮城,這也是我國古代城市的最早形態(tài);“非城郭形態(tài)”和“城郭形態(tài)”是宮城的基本形態(tài);宮城制度經(jīng)歷了多宮城制、雙宮城制和單一宮城制3個(gè)發(fā)展階段,其演變體現(xiàn)了古代都城核心空間建構(gòu)與重構(gòu)的基本過程,也反映了不同的政治變化;宮城既是都城空間發(fā)展的起點(diǎn)和原型空間,也是其它空間定位展開的原點(diǎn)和定位維度。 對里坊和市場的討論,主要圍繞發(fā)展形態(tài)和形態(tài)——功能展開,內(nèi)中既有對里坊和市場微觀結(jié)構(gòu)的考證復(fù)原,也有對其發(fā)展形態(tài)的中觀分析和把握。通過討論,認(rèn)為古代洛陽都城經(jīng)歷了三個(gè)發(fā)展階段,西周洛邑里制形成、北魏洛陽城里坊制和隋唐洛陽城坊里制是其中的3個(gè)關(guān)節(jié)點(diǎn);隋唐洛陽城里坊并非如傳統(tǒng)認(rèn)識
[Abstract]:Taking the ancient Luoyang capital space as the core, from the angle of "nation, space and society", this paper discusses the formation and evolution of Luoyang capital space during Xia and Song dynasties and its mechanism. Instead of taking an all-inclusive approach, the contents are based on the four basic common problems in the construction of capital space to be solved after the establishment of the dynasties (the location of the capital, the establishment of the political center, the control of the social system of the capital. The construction of the economic life center of the capital and the three structural units (Miyagi, Lifang, market) of the ancient Chinese capital are the core. On this basis, the relationship between the ancient Luoyang capital space and the ancient Chinese capital space model is discussed. First of all, the ancient city of Luoyang was investigated. On the basis of the definition of the ancient capital by the predecessors, and referring to the relevant research results of modern political science, this paper puts forward the specific standards to measure the ancient capital and the view that the western Zhou Dynasty has implemented the system of co-existence of both more and more capital, and the dynamic changes of the capital of Yanshi and Luoyang, the capital of Tang Dongdu, and so on. On this basis, the author re-determined Luoyang's specific capital in ancient dynasties and ages, and drew a new conclusion. After determining the time boundary and characteristics of Luoyang Capital Space, this paper discusses the causes of the ancient capital Luoyang. An investigation of Zhou Gong's theory of "the world in the world", which has a rough understanding in the past, makes it clear that Zhou Gong's theory of "the middle of the world" is the first systematic theory of capital construction in ancient China, and its contents include geography and politics. The four aspects of economy and culture not only formed the basis of the unique rationalism, sanctity and rationality of Luoyang, but also developed the concept and system of "choosing the neutral palace" and "choosing the central axis of the palace". It has a great influence on the layout of the capital and the spatial structure of the capital. The discussion about Miyagi is the part of this paper, which is divided into two aspects. The first is to discuss the historical process and stage characteristics of Miyagi in order to explain how the core space of the ancient capital was formed and under what background it was reconstructed. The second is to discuss the influence of the formation of Miyagi and the change of stages on the spatial structure of the ancient capital. Through discussion, it is pointed out that the earliest form of ancient capital in China is "non-urban Guo", which is also the earliest form of ancient Chinese cities, "non-urban Guo" and "urban Guo" are the basic forms of Miyagi. The Miyagi system has experienced three stages of development: multi-Miyagi system, double Miyagi system and single Miyagi system. Its evolution reflects the basic process of the construction and reconstruction of the core space of the ancient capital, as well as the different political changes. Miyagi is not only the starting point and prototype space of the development of capital space, but also the origin and orientation dimension of other spatial positioning. The discussion of Li Fang and the market mainly revolves around the development form and the form-function, in which the textual research and restoration of the microcosmic structure of the Li Fang and the market, as well as the meso analysis and grasp of the development pattern, are made. Through discussion, it is concluded that the ancient Luoyang capital experienced three stages of development, the Luoyang City Square system in the Northern Wei Dynasty and the Luoyang City Square system in the Sui and Tang dynasties were three of them, and the Luoyang City Square in the Sui and Tang dynasties was not the traditional understanding.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：陜西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2005
【分類號】：K928.6

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 李久昌;;河南歷史文化名城的保護(hù)與建設(shè)[J];三門峽職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

2 趙鈞陶;;從生態(tài)環(huán)境視角看兩漢都城遷徙原因[J];秦漢研究;2012年00期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 閻宏斌;洛陽近現(xiàn)代城市規(guī)劃歷史研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 郭婧;洛陽與韓孟詩派[D];河北師范大學(xué);2011年

2 肖紅兵;居洛士宦與北宋神哲朝政[D];上海師范大學(xué);2011年

3 戴良燕;夏商西周宮殿建筑文化研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2006年

4 劉冬亞;唐代洛陽詩歌研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2012年

5 蔣楠楠;城市公共設(shè)施的情感性研究[D];湖北工業(yè)大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1807096