發(fā)布時間：2018-04-06 21:09

  本文選題：甘棠港　切入點：三山志　出處：《福建史志》2015年03期

【摘要】：正對于福州甘棠港的研究,至今仍是熱議的話題,可見其意義。今時再論,似乎較前深入一些,卻依然難有共識。究其原因,除了時隔太久、資料缺乏之外,筆者以為也有對資料解讀的問題,看來還有深入探討的必要。首先,自然是對宋淳熙《三山志》記載的認識與解讀。眾所周知,《三山志》是南宋狀元、宰相梁克家主持編修的,有些內(nèi)容出自他的手筆�！端问贰繁緜髟u價梁克家,為人"風(fēng)度峻整","為文渾厚明白,辭命尤溫雅"�！度街尽纷鳛楣糯�
[Abstract]:The research on Fuzhou Gantang Port is still a hot topic, and its significance can be seen.At this time, it seems to be deeper than before, but it is still difficult to reach a consensus.The reason is that apart from too long time and lack of data, the author thinks that there is also the problem of interpretation of the data, it seems that there is a need for further discussion.First of all, the understanding and interpretation of Song Chunxi's three Mountains Records.As we all know, "San Shan Zhi" was compiled and edited by the leader of the Southern Song Dynasty, the prime minister Liang Kejia, and some of the contents were written by him.Quoting the words "you are gentle". "San Shan Zhi" as an ancient name
【作者單位】： 福建省文史館;
【分類號】：K925.7

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 廖大珂;;甘棠港的位置及其興衰初探[J];南洋問題研究;1993年03期

2 廖大珂;;閩國“甘棠港”考[J];福建學(xué)刊;1988年05期

3 林汀水;也談甘棠港與黃崎鎮(zhèn)的位置[J];中國社會經(jīng)濟史研究;1995年03期

4 王鐵藩;唐末開辟的甘棠港址考[J];福建論壇(文史哲版);1984年05期

5 廖大珂;再論“甘棠港”的歷史問題[J];中國社會經(jīng)濟史研究;1998年03期

6 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 鄭望 張志強;從港口茶埠到海西茶都[N];閩東日報;2010年

，

本文編號：1718909