本文選題：孭都　切入點：酆都　出處：《三峽大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版)》2015年04期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：本為道教勝地的四川豐都(今屬重慶市)后來卻以"鬼國之都"而聞名,其成因一直是眾說紛紜,莫衷一是。以往文獻記載揭示了漢代道家方士王方平、陰長生合稱被訛傳為"陰間之王",豐都地名演變導(dǎo)致文獻傳抄訛誤等原因,但一些論據(jù)仍缺乏史料證實。要澄清這一歷史誤會,需要梳理有關(guān)史料中對于實有地名"酆都"與傳說中的鬼城"酆都"的記載及其相互關(guān)聯(lián)。對照考察文獻資料可知:其一,"陰、王"連讀誤為"陰間之王"之說并無實證;其二,傳說中的鬼城"酆都"本是虛指,并無實地,后世訛傳和附會為實有地名"酆都";其三,明洪武十四年,"孭都"更名"酆都"。這一政府行為使"鬼城就在四川酆都"的訛傳基本被坐實。此后諸多文學(xué)作品都把傳說中的"酆都"認定為實有地名之"酆都"。
[Abstract]:Sichuan Fengdu (now Chongqing), which was a Taoist resort, was later famous for its "ghost capital", which was caused by divergent opinions and different opinions. Previous literature records revealed Wang Fangping, a Taoist scholar in the Han Dynasty. Yin-Changsheng was falsely referred to as the "King of Hades", and the evolution of Fengdu place names led to the error of literature transmission, but some of the arguments are still lack of historical data to prove. To clarify this historical misunderstanding, It is necessary to sort out the records of the actual place names "Feng du" and the legendary ghost city "Feng du" in the relevant historical materials and their interrelation. Comparing with the literature, we can see: first, there is no evidence that "Yin, Wang" has been misread as "King of Hades"; Second, the legendary ghost city "Feng du" is originally a virtual reference, and there is no field, and later generations of false biography and attachment will be a real place name "Feng du"; third, In 14 years of Ming Hongwu, the name "Feng du" was changed to "Feng du". This government action made the false rumor that "ghost city is in Fengdu, Sichuan" basically taken up. Since then, many literary works have recognized the legendary "Feng du" as the "Feng du" of real place names.
【作者單位】： 中國社會科學(xué)院圖書館古籍特藏部;
【分類號】：K928.6

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 鄧阿寧;宗教雜糅的酆都鬼城文化[J];重慶師院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2001年03期

2 秦大奎;周總理建議改“酆都”為“豐都”[J];四川黨史;1996年03期

3 白化文;;泰山東岳·地獄·酆都城(下)[J];文史知識;2011年12期

【共引文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王恒展;;《毛大福》本事考論[J];蒲松齡研究;2009年01期

2 李鋒;;從《窮漢詞》看蒲松齡的“懼貧”情結(jié)[J];蒲松齡研究;2010年02期

3 楊鑒哲;;李白山水詩的獨特魅力[J];安徽文學(xué)(下半月);2008年06期

4 張龍;;清山秀水太白仙——淺析李白山水詩的藝術(shù)特質(zhì)[J];安徽文學(xué)(下半月);2009年08期

5 于薇;肖融;;釋“造次”[J];安徽文學(xué)(下半月);2010年09期

6 席成孝;;漢水流域行政區(qū)劃在宋元時期的變化及其原因[J];安康學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年03期

7 閆盼盼;;從全唐詩看唐代的樂舞經(jīng)濟[J];安康學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年05期

8 儲小e，

本文編號：1590954