【摘要】：破產(chǎn)是市場經(jīng)濟(jì)下,自由競爭所帶來的不可避免的一種經(jīng)濟(jì)現(xiàn)象。一個國家的破產(chǎn)法律制度的完善與否,直接代表著本國市場經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展程度的成熟與否。破產(chǎn)法律制度是經(jīng)濟(jì)主體在進(jìn)入市場、經(jīng)濟(jì)行為停止后順暢退出的“安全閥門”；為相關(guān)破產(chǎn)利益主體提供法律保護(hù)以避免某些主體通過損害其他主體利益實現(xiàn)自己的不正當(dāng)利益,維護(hù)正常的破產(chǎn)秩序,在市場經(jīng)濟(jì)中起著關(guān)鍵作用。而有效的破產(chǎn)程序則是破產(chǎn)法能夠發(fā)揮效用的基礎(chǔ)。經(jīng)濟(jì)危機(jī)與金融危機(jī)并存的當(dāng)今世界,有序和有效的破產(chǎn)程序的穩(wěn)定適用有利于促進(jìn)增長和競爭,有助于防范和化解金融危機(jī),也可引導(dǎo)債務(wù)人對責(zé)任承擔(dān)更高的謹(jǐn)慎義務(wù),并促使債權(quán)人對于擴(kuò)大信貸與重組債權(quán)有更大的信心。 中韓兩國地域相鄰,文化蘊涵源遠(yuǎn)流長,經(jīng)貿(mào)交流頻繁。改革開放后中國國內(nèi)環(huán)境的顯著改善,強烈吸引著海外投資的眼光。因此,中國是韓國企業(yè)進(jìn)出海外時最優(yōu)先考慮的國家,從2002年開始,中國成為了韓國海外最大投資國。隨著中國經(jīng)濟(jì)政策改變,加上金融危機(jī)的影響,許多中小韓國企業(yè)面臨經(jīng)營危機(jī),有些不得不退出中國市場。了解把握中韓兩國破產(chǎn)法的內(nèi)容與差異,可以避免時間、經(jīng)濟(jì)成本等方面的浪費。 2006年,中韓兩國的破產(chǎn)法都進(jìn)行了較大修改�；诖�,本文在詳述中韓兩國破產(chǎn)法律制度的基礎(chǔ)上,通過對中韓兩國破產(chǎn)制度尤其是破產(chǎn)程序分階段、分層次進(jìn)行比較,希望可以為韓國企業(yè)投資或撤出中國市場時,更多了解并運用中韓兩國的破產(chǎn)法律制度使其避免不必要的混亂提供有益參考。 鑒于中韓兩國破產(chǎn)法律制度比較研究的資料較少,筆者擬通過介紹韓國破產(chǎn)法律制度中的定義、破產(chǎn)程序等主要內(nèi)容,為中韓兩國的學(xué)術(shù)交流與溝通提供一些基本信息。 本文認(rèn)為,破產(chǎn)法應(yīng)立足于本國的國情。通過比較可知,中韓兩國破產(chǎn)法律制度之間存在一定的差異,這是完全正常的。盡管此種差異因國家制度、經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)等差異而發(fā)生,但這不會妨礙彼此借鑒制度的合理之處。反之,取長補短可能是貫徹本土化原則的一個必不可少的過程。
[Abstract]:Bankruptcy is an inevitable economic phenomenon brought by free competition under the market economy. The perfection of a country's bankruptcy legal system directly represents the maturity of its market economy. The bankruptcy legal system is the "safety valve" for the economic subject to withdraw smoothly after entering the market and stopping the economic behavior. To provide legal protection for the relevant subject of bankruptcy interests in order to prevent some subjects from realizing their own improper interests by harming the interests of other subjects and to maintain the normal bankruptcy order play a key role in the market economy. The effective bankruptcy procedure is the basis of the bankruptcy law. In today's world where economic crisis and financial crisis coexist, the stable application of orderly and effective bankruptcy procedures is conducive to promoting growth and competition, helps to prevent and resolve financial crises, and can also lead the debtor to assume a higher duty of care with regard to liability. And to promote creditors to expand credit and restructuring of debt have greater confidence. China and South Korea are adjacent to each other, with a long history of cultural implications and frequent economic and trade exchanges. The remarkable improvement in China's domestic environment after the reform and opening up has strongly attracted overseas investment. As a result, China is the top priority for South Korean companies to move in and out of the country, becoming South Korea's biggest investor since 2002. With the change of China's economic policy and the impact of the financial crisis, many small and medium-sized Korean enterprises are facing a business crisis and some have to withdraw from the Chinese market. Understanding the contents and differences of bankruptcy laws between China and South Korea can avoid the waste of time and economic cost. In 2006, the bankruptcy laws of China and South Korea were greatly revised. Based on this, this paper, on the basis of detailing the bankruptcy legal systems of China and South Korea, compares the bankruptcy systems of China and South Korea, especially the bankruptcy procedures, into stages and levels, in the hope that they can invest or withdraw from the Chinese market for Korean enterprises. Learn more about and use the bankruptcy laws of China and South Korea to avoid unnecessary confusion. In view of the lack of comparative study on the bankruptcy legal system between China and South Korea, the author intends to provide some basic information for the academic exchange and communication between China and South Korea by introducing the definition and bankruptcy procedure of Korean bankruptcy law system. This article holds that the bankruptcy law should be based on the national conditions of our country. By comparison, there are some differences between China and South Korea bankruptcy legal system, which is completely normal. Although such differences occur because of differences in national systems and economic structures, they do not prevent each other from drawing on the reasonableness of the system. On the contrary, learning from each other may be an essential process to implement the principle of localization.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國海洋大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D922.291.92;D931.26

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 康曉磊;仲川;;對破產(chǎn)管理人法律地位的思考[J];法學(xué)論壇;2007年06期

，

本文編號：2231869