【摘要】：我國(guó)的法治秩序的建構(gòu)是一項(xiàng)系統(tǒng)工程,它涉及到社會(huì)生活的各個(gè)方面。國(guó)家法秩序和習(xí)慣法秩序是法治秩序的重要組成部分。因?yàn)榉ㄊ嵌嘣?從而法治實(shí)踐的規(guī)范資源也是多元的,既有國(guó)家制定法,也有習(xí)慣法。通過(guò)對(duì)習(xí)慣法和國(guó)家法以及二者之間關(guān)系的研究似乎更能讓我們清晰地認(rèn)識(shí)到法治建設(shè)的梗阻問(wèn)題,進(jìn)而主張法治進(jìn)程中要實(shí)現(xiàn)國(guó)家法和習(xí)慣法的對(duì)接與溝通,恰當(dāng)?shù)匕l(fā)掘習(xí)慣法的價(jià)值。這是本文要探討的問(wèn)題和意義之所在。 要從習(xí)慣法中發(fā)掘其價(jià)值就必須先對(duì)習(xí)慣法有一個(gè)清醒的認(rèn)識(shí)。習(xí)慣法的概念界定一直是學(xué)界討論的話題,本文站在法律多元的語(yǔ)境下,摒棄了傳統(tǒng)法學(xué)的一元法律觀,就法做出了一個(gè)更廣泛意義上的解釋,法是一系列規(guī)則體系。這樣習(xí)慣法的概念才可能得以提出,習(xí)慣法自身的特征使得其與習(xí)慣、國(guó)家法區(qū)別開(kāi)來(lái)。作為原生規(guī)則的習(xí)慣法和作為創(chuàng)生規(guī)則的國(guó)家法是并存的,它們之間存在矛盾沖突,但也存在互補(bǔ)和融合。在當(dāng)下,我國(guó)習(xí)慣法具有雙重屬性,它既是特定社會(huì)組織社會(huì)區(qū)域秩序的維護(hù)者,又是法治秩序支撐者。 研究習(xí)慣法的意義不僅在于向人們展示習(xí)慣法這一民族文化的瑰寶,更在于給我國(guó)的法治建設(shè)提供一個(gè)可行的借鑒和指引。我國(guó)法治建設(shè)應(yīng)該走怎樣的道路一直是法學(xué)界討論的重要課題。一種觀點(diǎn)是“自發(fā)秩序道路”或稱“自主型法治道路”；另一種是“法律移植道路”或者“現(xiàn)代化道路”。然而兩種道路的局限性讓我們不得不重新審視我國(guó)法治建設(shè)的實(shí)現(xiàn)途徑。由于我國(guó)的特殊國(guó)情以及自身的歷史原因和現(xiàn)實(shí)原因,兩種道路的結(jié)合成為我國(guó)的法治實(shí)踐的必然選擇。在這種混合道路中,法律移植所取得的成就是功不可沒(méi)的,但是“本土資源”的潛力也是有待進(jìn)一步開(kāi)發(fā)。其在國(guó)家法制定、司法實(shí)踐、守法心理的塑造以及社會(huì)治理方面的價(jià)值對(duì)為法治建設(shè)提供了良好的社會(huì)環(huán)境。
[Abstract]:The construction of legal order in China is a systematic project, which involves all aspects of social life. The order of state law and customary law is an important part of the order of rule of law. Because the law is pluralistic, so the normative resources of the practice of rule of law are pluralistic, both the state law and customary law. Through the study of customary law and national law and the relationship between them, it seems that we can clearly understand the obstruction of the construction of the rule of law, and then advocate that the connection and communication between national law and customary law should be realized in the process of rule of law. Properly excavate the value of customary law. This is the problem and significance of this paper. In order to discover its value from customary law, we must have a clear understanding of customary law. The definition of the concept of customary law has always been a topic of discussion in academic circles. In the context of legal pluralism, this article abandoned the monistic legal view of traditional jurisprudence, and made a more extensive interpretation of law, which is a series of rules system. In this way, the concept of customary law can be put forward, and the characteristics of customary law make it different from custom and national law. The customary law as the primary rule and the national law as the creation rule coexist, and there are contradictions and conflicts between them, but there is also complementarity and integration. At present, the customary law of our country has dual attributes, it is not only the maintainer of the social regional order of the specific social organization, but also the maintainer of the order of the rule of law. The significance of studying customary law is not only to show people that customary law is the treasure of national culture, but also to provide a feasible reference and guidance for the construction of rule of law in our country. What kind of road should be taken in the construction of the rule of law in our country has always been an important topic for discussion in the field of law. One view is "the road of spontaneous order" or "the road of independent rule of law", the other is "the road of law transplantation" or "road of modernization". However, the limitations of the two ways make us have to re-examine the ways to achieve the construction of the rule of law in our country. Because of the special national conditions of our country and its own historical and realistic reasons, the combination of the two ways has become the inevitable choice of our country's practice of ruling by law. In this mixed road, the achievements of legal transplantation are indispensable, but the potential of "local resources" needs to be further developed. Its value in the establishment of national law, judicial practice, law-abiding psychology and social governance provides a good social environment for the construction of the rule of law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D920.0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐勇;;“法律下鄉(xiāng)”:鄉(xiāng)土社會(huì)的雙重法律制度整合[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2008年03期

2 蘇力;當(dāng)代中國(guó)法律中的習(xí)慣——一個(gè)制定法的透視[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2001年03期

3 關(guān)保英;論行政習(xí)慣法[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年03期

4 李學(xué)蘭;;從功能與意義視角看民間法研究[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年05期

5 賈煥銀;;民間法研究之于中國(guó)法學(xué):意義與方法啟示[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年06期

6 郝紅梅;韓德強(qiáng);;論村民自治權(quán)運(yùn)行中的權(quán)力制約問(wèn)題[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

7 林孝文;;瑤族法律文化研究——以廣西金秀瑤族為例[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

8 何真;唐清利;;制度化與非制度化:國(guó)家法與民族習(xí)慣交叉滲透的生產(chǎn)性實(shí)踐[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

9 李清偉;;法律人類學(xué)視角下的法的概念與法律失靈[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

10 程朝陽(yáng);韓紅;;論民間規(guī)則的價(jià)值蘊(yùn)涵及其對(duì)農(nóng)村法治的可能啟示[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：2141992