刑事審判中的民意
發(fā)布時間：2018-07-13 08:18
【摘要】：近年來,隨著我國社會轉型和法治建設的推進,刑事審判與民意的矛盾在審判活動中越來越突出,并且經(jīng)常以緊張的形式表現(xiàn)出來,民意不僅拷問著包括法官在內的每一個相關者的心靈,而且還撼動著整個刑事審判制度。從當年影響全國的“劉涌案”、“張金柱案”、“孫志剛案”,到近年來備受關注的“許霆案”、“吳英案”、“鄧玉嬌案”,無不在向我們表明,民意已經(jīng)對我國的刑事審判制度造成巨大的影響。雖然民意和刑事審判有一定的沖突,但是民意與刑事審判在目標指向上具有一致性,即都是為了最大程度的實現(xiàn)司法公平、正義。因此二者不應是對立的,而應是相互促進的。刑事司法審判過程中不應當排斥、抗拒、逃避民意,而應當審慎的傾聽、吸納、回應民意,并通過刑事審判的正當程序過濾、制約民意,使民意轉化為作為法律元素的量刑情節(jié)進入審判。刑事審判吸納民意,則強化了司法民主,增加了刑事判決的可接受性。 然而,即使民意對刑事司法具有再大的價值與作用,但是民意不能等同于法律,更不能替代法律。在中國司法獨立較為脆弱,司法信任度較低,政治性權力可輕易干預司法的國情下,不宜過度強調司法的人民性。在刑事審判過程中,法官必須堅持法律人的職業(yè)理性和獨立審判原則,以審慎的態(tài)度合理的吸納民意,并理性的確定民意影響刑事審判中的外部邊界,實現(xiàn)民意與刑事審判的良性互動。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the development of social transformation and the construction of the rule of law in our country, the contradiction between criminal trial and public opinion has become more and more prominent in the trial activities, and it is often shown in a tense form. Public opinion not only grilled the hearts of everyone involved, including judges, but also shook the entire criminal justice system. From the "Liu Yong case", the "Zhang Jinzhu case" and the "Sun Zhigang case" that affected the whole country in those years, to the "Xu Ting case", the "Wu Ying case" and the "Deng Yujiao case" that have attracted much attention in recent years, all of them have shown us that Public opinion has had a great impact on our criminal justice system. Although there is some conflict between public opinion and criminal trial, there is consistency between public opinion and criminal trial, that is, to realize justice and justice to the greatest extent. Therefore, the two should not be opposite, but should be mutually reinforcing. In the process of criminal justice, we should not reject, resist or evade public opinion, but should listen carefully, absorb and respond to public opinion, and restrict public opinion through the due process of criminal trial. Turn public opinion into sentencing circumstances as a legal element into trial. Criminal trial absorbs public opinion, strengthens judicial democracy and increases the acceptability of criminal judgment. However, even though public opinion has great value and function to criminal justice, public opinion can not be equated with law, nor can it replace law. In China, judicial independence is weak, judicial trust is low, political power can easily interfere with the administration of justice, it is not appropriate to overemphasize the people's character of judicature. In the process of criminal trial, the judge must adhere to the professional rationality of the legal person and the principle of independent trial, absorb the public opinion reasonably with a prudent attitude, and rationally determine the influence of public opinion on the external boundary in the criminal trial. Realize the benign interaction between public opinion and criminal trial.
【學位授予單位】：揚州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D925.2
本文編號：2118754
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the development of social transformation and the construction of the rule of law in our country, the contradiction between criminal trial and public opinion has become more and more prominent in the trial activities, and it is often shown in a tense form. Public opinion not only grilled the hearts of everyone involved, including judges, but also shook the entire criminal justice system. From the "Liu Yong case", the "Zhang Jinzhu case" and the "Sun Zhigang case" that affected the whole country in those years, to the "Xu Ting case", the "Wu Ying case" and the "Deng Yujiao case" that have attracted much attention in recent years, all of them have shown us that Public opinion has had a great impact on our criminal justice system. Although there is some conflict between public opinion and criminal trial, there is consistency between public opinion and criminal trial, that is, to realize justice and justice to the greatest extent. Therefore, the two should not be opposite, but should be mutually reinforcing. In the process of criminal justice, we should not reject, resist or evade public opinion, but should listen carefully, absorb and respond to public opinion, and restrict public opinion through the due process of criminal trial. Turn public opinion into sentencing circumstances as a legal element into trial. Criminal trial absorbs public opinion, strengthens judicial democracy and increases the acceptability of criminal judgment. However, even though public opinion has great value and function to criminal justice, public opinion can not be equated with law, nor can it replace law. In China, judicial independence is weak, judicial trust is low, political power can easily interfere with the administration of justice, it is not appropriate to overemphasize the people's character of judicature. In the process of criminal trial, the judge must adhere to the professional rationality of the legal person and the principle of independent trial, absorb the public opinion reasonably with a prudent attitude, and rationally determine the influence of public opinion on the external boundary in the criminal trial. Realize the benign interaction between public opinion and criminal trial.
【學位授予單位】：揚州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D925.2
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前9條
1 陳樹森;;博弈與和諧:穿行于法意與民意之間的司法[J];法律適用;2009年09期
2 楊溫蕊;王保帥;;刑事審判中的民意考量[J];法制與社會;2011年31期
3 劉作翔;徐景和;;案例指導制度的理論基礎[J];法學研究;2006年03期
4 陳林林;;公眾意見在裁判結構中的地位[J];法學研究;2012年01期
5 孫萬懷;;論民意在刑事司法中的解構[J];中外法學;2011年01期
6 蘭紹江;;論網(wǎng)絡輿論監(jiān)督——從沈陽劉涌案的網(wǎng)上風波談起[J];信息網(wǎng)絡安全;2006年04期
7 顧培東;;公眾判意的法理解析——對許霆案的延伸思考[J];中國法學;2008年04期
8 孫笑俠;;司法的政治力學——民眾、媒體、為政者、當事人與司法官的關系分析[J];中國法學;2011年02期
9 褚國建;;法院如何回應民意:一種法學方法論上的解決方案[J];浙江社會科學;2010年03期
，本文編號：2118754
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/minzhuminquanlunwen/2118754.html
