本文選題：信訪 + 法治化��； 參考：《中國政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著近年來信訪制度在實(shí)踐中逐漸暴露出諸多問題,無論是理論界還是實(shí)務(wù)界對(duì)于信訪制度存廢的爭(zhēng)議都似乎越演越烈,信訪制度應(yīng)當(dāng)何去何從成了一個(gè)亟待解決的問題。筆者認(rèn)為,就目前我國國情而言,信訪制度應(yīng)當(dāng)保留,但同時(shí)也必須進(jìn)行制度完善,而法治化則是完善信訪制度的一條必由之路。 本文除引言外,共分六部分。文章第一部分為信訪概述,綜合介紹了信訪的概念和特征、我國信訪的現(xiàn)狀與困境、并針對(duì)當(dāng)前存在的關(guān)于信訪制度的存廢之爭(zhēng)著重闡述了我國目前保留信訪制度的現(xiàn)實(shí)性與可行性;第二部分為信訪的理論基礎(chǔ),筆者認(rèn)為信訪的理論基礎(chǔ)主要包括人民主權(quán)、人民民主、社會(huì)安全閥、依法行政;第三部分為國外主要相關(guān)制度簡(jiǎn)介,分別介紹了瑞典、英國的議會(huì)監(jiān)察專員制度,德國的申訴委員會(huì),日本的苦情處理制度,法國的調(diào)解專員制度,并輔以同我國信訪制度的比較分析;第四部分為信訪法治化制度建構(gòu)建議,分別從完善信訪立法、確立信訪聽證制度、建立律師介入信訪機(jī)制、設(shè)立信訪專員等四個(gè)大方面提出筆者的建議;第五部分為律師介入信訪制度建構(gòu)設(shè)想,通過對(duì)律師介入信訪的優(yōu)勢(shì)和作用進(jìn)行分析闡述,提出律師介入信訪制度建構(gòu)設(shè)想;第六部分為文章結(jié)語。
[Abstract]:In recent years, many problems have been gradually exposed in the practice of the petition system. Whether in theory or in practice, the controversy over the existence or abolition of the petition system seems to be getting stronger and stronger, and where the letter and visit system should go has become an urgent problem to be solved. The author believes that, as far as the present situation of our country is concerned, the system of letters and visits should be preserved, but at the same time, it must be perfected, and the rule of law is the only way to perfect the system of letters and visits. In addition to the introduction, this article is divided into six parts. The first part of the article is an overview of letters and visits, including the concept and characteristics of letters and visits, the present situation and difficulties of letters and visits in China. In view of the current debate about the existence of the petition system, the author focuses on the reality and feasibility of retaining the petition system in China. The second part is the theoretical basis of the letter and visit system, the author believes that the theoretical basis of the petition system mainly includes the sovereignty of the people. People's democracy, social safety valve, administration by law. The third part is a brief introduction to the main relevant systems abroad, introducing respectively the parliamentary ombudsman system in Sweden and Britain, the complaints committee in Germany, and the bitter situation handling system in Japan. France's mediation commissioner system, supplemented by a comparative analysis with our country's system of letters and visits; the fourth part is the proposal to construct the system of legalization of letters and visits, respectively, from perfecting the legislation of letters and visits, establishing the hearing system of letters and visits, and establishing the mechanism of lawyers' intervention in letters and visits. The fifth part is the conception of the lawyer's intervention in the system of petition and visit, through the analysis of the advantages and functions of the lawyer's intervention in the letter and visit, the author puts forward the idea of the lawyer's intervention in the system of petition and visit. The sixth part is the conclusion of the article.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.1;D632.8

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孫悅良;信訪制度法治化研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張樹淵;論行政信訪對(duì)弱勢(shì)群體的權(quán)利救濟(jì)[D];天津師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：2085109