本文選題：法治成本 + 隱性采訪　； 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：隱性采訪是指以偷拍偷錄為主要拍攝手段的眾多新聞采訪方式中的一種,它通過非常規(guī)的手段獲得常規(guī)手段難以挖掘的新聞素材受到媒體和受眾的追捧,近年來一直活躍在民眾的媒體生活中。隱性采訪的法治成本研究在當(dāng)前的社會(huì)歷史條件下十分必要并且具有可行性。事實(shí)上,隱性采訪“高人氣”的背后也隱藏了嚴(yán)肅的社會(huì)和法律問題,比如引起了一系列新聞侵權(quán)訴訟,引發(fā)了社會(huì)的誠(chéng)信危機(jī)等。本文將隱性采訪這一當(dāng)下備受爭(zhēng)議的新聞現(xiàn)象從法學(xué)和經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)結(jié)合的角度進(jìn)行探析,通過對(duì)隱性采訪法治成本的考量,提出隱性采訪走向法治化的一些構(gòu)想,以期為隱性采訪探求一條公平與效率兼顧的法治路徑。首先考量隱性采訪的靜態(tài)法治成本,主要包括隱性采訪的立法成本和法律實(shí)施成本。其中立法成本包括立法自身工作成本以及立法的社會(huì)成本；法律實(shí)施成本則包括執(zhí)法成本、司法成本以及守法成本。其次考量隱性采訪在實(shí)踐中的法治成本,主要是指在多年的實(shí)踐中面臨的公正流失,觀念失衡等問題,包括隱性采訪在追求實(shí)體正義的過程中與程序正義產(chǎn)生的矛盾；隱性采訪給新聞行業(yè)及受眾帶來的效益和實(shí)踐中產(chǎn)生的負(fù)面效應(yīng)；隱性采訪在實(shí)踐中對(duì)社會(huì)發(fā)展造成的影響。最后,提出隱性采訪的法治構(gòu)想,包括《記者法》立法路徑的選擇以及具體的立法規(guī)制,即采訪權(quán)屬性的規(guī)制、采訪啟動(dòng)的規(guī)制、采訪內(nèi)容及手段的規(guī)制。
[Abstract]:Recessive interview refers to one of the many methods of news interview, which is mainly used to shoot secretly and secretly. It is sought after by the media and the audience through unconventional means to obtain news material that is difficult to excavate by conventional means. In recent years has been active in the mass media life. It is necessary and feasible to study the legal cost of recessive interview under the current social and historical conditions. In fact, the hidden interview "high popularity" also hides serious social and legal problems, such as a series of news tort litigation, triggered a social integrity crisis and so on. This paper analyzes the recessive interview, a controversial news phenomenon, from the angle of the combination of law and economics, and through the consideration of the cost of the rule of law of the recessive interview, puts forward some ideas of the recessive interview moving towards the rule of law. In order to explore a recessive interview, a fair and efficient way to rule by law. Firstly, the static cost of rule of law is considered, including the cost of legislation and the cost of law enforcement. The cost of legislation includes the cost of legislation itself and the social cost of legislation, while the cost of law enforcement includes the cost of law enforcement, the cost of judicature and the cost of abiding by the law. Secondly, considering the cost of the rule of law in the practice of recessive interview, mainly refers to the problems such as the loss of justice and the imbalance of concept in the practice for many years, including the contradiction between the hidden interview and the procedural justice in the process of pursuing substantive justice; The benefit of recessive interview to news industry and audience and the negative effect in practice, and the influence of recessive interview on social development in practice. Finally, the author puts forward the idea of the rule of law of the recessive interview, including the choice of the legislative path and the specific legislative regulation, that is, the regulation of the attribute of the right to interview, the regulation of the initiation of the interview, the regulation of the content and means of the interview.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：G212.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳力丹;;介入式暗訪不能作為采訪的常規(guī)[J];今傳媒;2006年12期

2 張建偉;新法律經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué):理論流派與反思性評(píng)論[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2000年09期

3 郭鎮(zhèn)之;采訪、暗訪與偷拍──北美國(guó)家關(guān)于新聞采訪中涉及隱私權(quán)的若干法律規(guī)定[J];電視研究;2000年06期

4 游勸榮;;法治成本論略[J];福建論壇(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年07期

5 蔣曉玲;;隱性采訪立法規(guī)制研究[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年26期

6 沈放;;淺析程序公正[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年06期

7 徐力;;法律視角下的隱性采訪探討[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年02期

8 李新宇,董嬌嬌;隱性采訪之侵權(quán)責(zé)任[J];華北電力大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年02期

9 蘇力;認(rèn)真對(duì)待人治[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1998年01期

10 劉瑞瑞;;立法成本的法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)縱橫;2006年08期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李藝;論隱性采訪的法治成本[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1948458