本文選題：村規(guī)民約 + 法治建設(shè)��； 參考：《揚(yáng)州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：村規(guī)民約古已有之,從古代的“鄉(xiāng)約”到現(xiàn)代法治建設(shè)下的的村民自治章程,其都在基層社會治理中發(fā)揮著非常重要的作用。謝暉教授在他的《民間法之于法治作用的三個(gè)向度》一文中提到,國家具有“議事、行政、審判”三個(gè)機(jī)能,用以創(chuàng)造交往秩序的規(guī)則,無論是國家法,還是民間規(guī)范,都應(yīng)在此三個(gè)方向上供法治秩序的建立和維護(hù),而作為民間法典型代表的村規(guī)民約,在立法上自發(fā)的為農(nóng)村村民主體立法,為國家正式制度的建立提供有益的借鑒、甚至直接予以國家正式的規(guī)范資源;在行政上把那些沒被法律明令認(rèn)可,在實(shí)踐中卻行之有效的規(guī)則規(guī)范運(yùn)用到解決行政活動(dòng)中去;在作為法律“最后守護(hù)者”的司法上,以村規(guī)民約為一定基礎(chǔ)的立法,取之于民,用之于民。為充分發(fā)揮村規(guī)民約的作用,實(shí)現(xiàn)村規(guī)民約與國家法的共同發(fā)展,推進(jìn)法治建設(shè)進(jìn)程,因此本文提出在現(xiàn)代法治建設(shè)的背景下對村規(guī)民約進(jìn)行研究分析。本文運(yùn)用分析和綜合等學(xué)習(xí)方式,參閱了大量參考文獻(xiàn)和研究數(shù)據(jù),通過整理和分析,從法理學(xué)的角度形成了對村規(guī)民約的系統(tǒng)理解,下面用五個(gè)部分具體描述。第一部分是緒論,介紹了論文的選題背景和選題價(jià)值,由黨的會議關(guān)于依法治國的的發(fā)展歷程引出本題的法治建設(shè)背景,通過對比傳統(tǒng)民間法的研究重點(diǎn),以此介紹本文的創(chuàng)新之處。第二部分對村規(guī)民約基本內(nèi)容的概述,介紹了村規(guī)民約的歷史變遷、傳統(tǒng)村規(guī)民約的含義以及現(xiàn)代法治建設(shè)背景下村規(guī)民約新的含義和新的發(fā)展。第三部分是對村規(guī)民約的功能分析。首先是彌補(bǔ)國家立法的功能,這也是國家法在農(nóng)村特殊環(huán)境下無法面面俱到而出現(xiàn)村規(guī)民約的原因;再者是村規(guī)民約的實(shí)施促進(jìn)了國家法律的實(shí)施,體現(xiàn)了村規(guī)民約存在的合理性;此外,村規(guī)民約不僅對外作用巨大,其對自身農(nóng)村社會建設(shè)管理也起很大推進(jìn)作用;村規(guī)民約作為國家法與農(nóng)村社會的橋梁,其傳承了農(nóng)村社會的優(yōu)良傳統(tǒng)以契合國家法的實(shí)施。第四部分介紹當(dāng)前村規(guī)民約存在的主要問題以及對出現(xiàn)這一系列問題的原因進(jìn)行分析。第五部分對當(dāng)前村規(guī)民約出現(xiàn)的問題提出一些自己的建議以及在法治建設(shè)背景下對村規(guī)民約進(jìn)行體系重構(gòu)的分析。希望通過本文對村規(guī)民約的分析研究,在傳統(tǒng)研究的基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)一步理解村規(guī)民約與國家法律的相互關(guān)系,從而科學(xué)建設(shè)村規(guī)民約,完善社會主義法治建設(shè),使傳統(tǒng)民間法與現(xiàn)代法治精神和諧統(tǒng)一、基層自治與與國家管理相輔相成,切實(shí)村規(guī)民約在社會主義法治建設(shè)中發(fā)揮重要作用,為全面推進(jìn)依法治國提供有益的借鑒。
[Abstract]:The village rules and regulations have existed in ancient times, from the ancient "Xiang covenant" to the villager autonomy constitution under the construction of modern rule of law, they all play a very important role in the social governance at the grass-roots level. Professor Xie Hui mentioned in his "three Dimensions of Folk Law in the role of the Rule of Law" that the state has three functions: "deliberative, administrative and judicial", which are used to create rules for the order of communication, whether national law or folk norms. All should be in these three directions for the establishment and maintenance of the order of the rule of law. As a typical representative of folk law, the village rules and regulations should legislate spontaneously for the main body of the rural villagers and provide useful reference for the establishment of the formal system of the country. They even directly provide the country with formal normative resources; administratively apply those rules which are not recognized by the law and are effective in practice to the settlement of administrative activities; and in the administration of justice as the "last guardian" of the law, With the village rules and regulations as a certain basis of legislation, to take the people, the use of the people. In order to give full play to the role of village rules and regulations, to realize the common development of village rules and state law, and to promote the process of building the rule of law, this paper puts forward the research and analysis of village rules under the background of modern rule of law construction. In this paper, by means of analysis and synthesis, we refer to a large number of references and research data, and form a systematic understanding of village rules and regulations from the angle of jurisprudence through collation and analysis, which are described in five parts below. The first part is the introduction, which introduces the background and value of the selected topic, leads to the background of the rule of law by the development of the Party meeting on the rule of law, and compares the research focus of the traditional folk law. This paper introduces the innovation of this article. The second part summarizes the basic contents of the village rules and regulations, introduces the historical changes of the village rules and regulations, the meaning of the traditional village rules and regulations, and the new meaning and new development of the village rules and regulations under the background of the construction of the modern rule of law. The third part is the function analysis of village rules and regulations. The first is to make up for the function of the national legislation, which is also the reason why the state law can not be all-encompassing in the special rural environment. Moreover, the implementation of the village rules and regulations promotes the implementation of the national laws. It reflects the rationality of the existence of village rules and regulations; in addition, village rules not only play a great role in promoting the management of rural social construction, but also play a great role in promoting their own rural social construction, as a bridge between the state law and rural society, the village rules and regulations are used as a bridge between the state law and the rural society. It inherits the fine tradition of rural society in line with the implementation of national law. The fourth part introduces the main problems existing in the village rules and analyzes the causes of these problems. In the fifth part, the author puts forward some suggestions on the problems of the village rules and regulations and analyses the reconstruction of the village rules system under the background of the rule of law construction. It is hoped that through the analysis and study of village rules and regulations in this paper, we can further understand the relationship between village rules and national laws on the basis of traditional research, so as to scientifically construct village rules and improve the socialist legal construction. Make the traditional folk law and the spirit of modern rule of law harmoniously unify, the grass-roots autonomy and the national management complement each other, the village rules and regulations play an important role in the construction of the socialist rule of law, and provide useful reference for promoting the rule of law in an all-round way.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：揚(yáng)州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D921.8

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬存利,李晨;民間法初探[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期

2 劉鵬飛,鄧興廣;民間法概念辨析[J];浙江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年06期

3 王勇;國家法和民間法的現(xiàn)實(shí)互動(dòng)與歷史變遷——中國西部司法個(gè)案的透視[J];西北師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2002年04期

4 張曉輝 ,王啟梁;變遷中的少數(shù)民族民間法[J];今日民族;2002年08期

5 劉作翔;具體的“民間法”——一個(gè)法律社會學(xué)視野的考察[J];浙江社會科學(xué);2003年04期

6 王青林;民間法基本概念問題探析[J];上海師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2003年03期

7 許增裕;法律的完善細(xì)化應(yīng)關(guān)注民間法[J];學(xué)術(shù)探索;2003年S1期

8 李澤;現(xiàn)代社會民間法存在的合理性[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

9 霍建平;試論國家法與民間法[J];內(nèi)蒙古科技與經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年12期

10 楊帆;國家法與民間法雙向互動(dòng)之思考[J];四川理工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2005年02期

相關(guān)會議論文 前4條

1 支果;;民間法與鹽業(yè)合伙契約[A];鹽文化研究論叢(第二輯)[C];2007年

2 張佩國;;地方性秩序的再生產(chǎn)——鄉(xiāng)村糾紛中國家法與民間法的多元互動(dòng)[A];區(qū)域社會史比較研究中青年學(xué)者學(xué)術(shù)討論會論文集[C];2004年

3 乾潤梅;;法律多元視角下的民間法[A];當(dāng)代法學(xué)論壇（2008年第3輯）[C];2008年

4 談蕭;;初論商會與行業(yè)協(xié)會法——基于民間法和國家法二元視角的分析[A];中國商法年刊（2007）：和諧社會構(gòu)建中的商法建設(shè)[C];2007年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 陳杰人;陋習(xí)不是“民間法”[N];檢察日報(bào);2000年

2 謝暉;不能忽視民間法的理論提升[N];檢察日報(bào);2014年

3 楊濤;“小偷示眾”凸顯國家法與民間法的博弈[N];檢察日報(bào);2004年

4 貴州大學(xué) 楊禮熠;國家法與民間法辨證關(guān)系探微[N];貴州民族報(bào);2010年

5 江蘇省東臺市人民法院 許建兵 薛忠勛;對“民間法”的文化解讀[N];人民法院報(bào);2013年

6 劉武俊;“民間法”的有所為和“國家法”的有所不為[N];法制日報(bào);2000年

7 柴玉麗 夏 青;民間法與法制現(xiàn)代化[N];人民法院報(bào);2002年

8 方向新;防治民間法對婦女土地權(quán)益的侵害[N];中國社會報(bào);2004年

9 西南政法大學(xué) 龍大軒;和合：傳統(tǒng)文化中的國家法與民間法[N];中國民族報(bào);2007年

10 孟澍菲;謝暉：從法哲學(xué)到民間法[N];檢察日報(bào);2008年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 張曉萍;論民間法的司法運(yùn)用[D];山東大學(xué);2010年

2 田成有;傳統(tǒng)與現(xiàn)代：鄉(xiāng)土社會中的民間法[D];中國政法大學(xué);2005年

3 陳冬春;論習(xí)慣的力量[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

4 卞輝;農(nóng)村社會治理中的現(xiàn)代鄉(xiāng)規(guī)民約研究[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 劉迎光;對現(xiàn)代市民社會中民間法的理性分析[D];中國石油大學(xué);2008年

2 楊云玲;國家法與民間法的二元建構(gòu)及其互動(dòng)之思考[D];煙臺大學(xué);2008年

3 姜琳琳;法治進(jìn)程中民間法與國家法的融合[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2008年

4 蒙愛紅;轉(zhuǎn)型中國民間法與國家法關(guān)系的互補(bǔ)研究[D];西北師范大學(xué);2009年

5 田英蓮;民間法的實(shí)踐運(yùn)用及其問題[D];山東大學(xué);2009年

6 陳晨;民間法：一種活的法律[D];南京師范大學(xué);2006年

7 王斐;國家法效力危機(jī)的民間法救濟(jì)[D];山東大學(xué);2006年

8 王來西;民間法：法律還是其他[D];西南政法大學(xué);2003年

9 鄭君;國家法與民間法互動(dòng)之反思及建議[D];華中科技大學(xué);2006年

10 周石甫;民間法的運(yùn)行[D];湘潭大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：1858088