本文選題：法治政府　切入點(diǎn)：善治　出處：《吉林大學(xué)》2010年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 政府是社會(huì)自身演化出來的必要的功能性實(shí)體,為完成其承擔(dān)的政府義務(wù)和責(zé)任就必須具有相應(yīng)的權(quán)力,即公共權(quán)力。在公共權(quán)力行使中,有兩種基本要素——嚴(yán)格按照法律的要素和自由裁量的要素,這表明,行政裁量是公共權(quán)力行使的典型特征和內(nèi)在要素:其正確和正當(dāng)行使,可以有效彌補(bǔ)立法機(jī)關(guān)的立法不足、司法機(jī)關(guān)事后監(jiān)督的缺陷,更能及時(shí)有效地實(shí)現(xiàn)人權(quán)保護(hù)和福利國家的福利行政給付等善治目標(biāo)。然而,雖然裁量是法治政府要素中所必然具有的核心性成分,但是,從純粹的法律邏輯關(guān)系建構(gòu)角度看,裁量權(quán)猶如隱藏在法治背后的“特洛伊木馬”,是法治屋頂之上的巨大的窟窿:裁量之治與法治的規(guī)則之治,有著天然的拒斥關(guān)系。如何有效發(fā)揮行政裁量的靈活性、目的性、應(yīng)變性、以很好地彌補(bǔ)法律規(guī)則的局限性的正向功能的同時(shí),又對(duì)之進(jìn)行有效約束、確保其正確和正當(dāng)行使,以形成行政裁量與現(xiàn)代法治的共生共榮的兼容關(guān)系,無疑是現(xiàn)代法治國家都必須著力解決的重大理論和實(shí)踐問題。本文以實(shí)證研究方法為基本研究方法,并結(jié)合后現(xiàn)代法學(xué)的基本理論和研究方法對(duì)之進(jìn)行了深入淺出的分析:剖析了裁量的涵義、裁量與法治和法治政府的關(guān)系,并提出了治理行政裁量危害的具體策略和制度選擇。具體說來就是,在取消不必要的裁量,制約必要的裁量的基礎(chǔ)目標(biāo)上,以中國國情為背景,在不預(yù)設(shè)和凸出某一種行政裁量治理模式基礎(chǔ)上,實(shí)證分析立法-行政-司法和非正式國家權(quán)力對(duì)行政裁量的約束實(shí)效,由此主張應(yīng)當(dāng)謹(jǐn)慎對(duì)待以人民法院司法審查為主的通行的行政裁量治理模式,發(fā)展多元行政裁量的治理模式,以實(shí)現(xiàn)和諧善治的治理目標(biāo)。
[Abstract]:The government is a necessary functional entity evolved by the society itself. In order to fulfill its governmental obligations and responsibilities, it must have the corresponding power, that is, the public power. There are two basic elements-strictly according to the elements of the law and the elements of discretion, which show that administrative discretion is the typical and intrinsic feature of the exercise of public power: its correct and proper exercise can effectively compensate for the legislative insufficiency of the legislature. The defects of the judicial supervision after the event can more effectively realize the goals of good governance such as the protection of human rights and the welfare administration of the welfare state in a timely and effective manner. However, although discretion is the core element in the elements of the rule of law government, however, From the perspective of pure legal logic relationship construction, discretion is like a Trojan horse hidden behind the rule of law, which is a huge hole in the roof of the rule of law: the rule of discretion and the rule of law. There is a natural rejection relationship. How to effectively exert the flexibility, purpose and change of administrative discretion, so as to make up for the positive function of the limitation of legal rules, and at the same time effectively restrain it and ensure its correct and proper exercise. In order to form the compatible relationship between administrative discretion and modern rule of law, it is undoubtedly a major theoretical and practical problem that all modern countries under the rule of law must focus on. This paper takes the empirical research method as the basic research method. Combined with the basic theories and research methods of postmodern law, the author analyzes the meaning of discretion, the relationship between discretion and the rule of law and the government by law. And put forward the specific strategy and system choice to control the harm of administrative discretion. Specifically, in the basic goal of eliminating unnecessary discretion and restricting necessary discretion, the background of China's national conditions is taken as the background. On the basis of not presupposing and protruding a certain administrative discretion governance model, this paper empirically analyzes the binding effect of lawmaking-administrative-judicial and informal state power on administrative discretion. Therefore, we should treat the administrative discretion governance mode which is based on the judicial review of the people's court with caution and develop the multivariate administrative discretion governance mode in order to realize the governance goal of harmonious and good governance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D922.1

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 繆沙琪;;我國行政裁量權(quán)及其規(guī)范[J];宜賓學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 汪薇;行政過程視角下行政裁量的控制研究[D];中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)（北京）;2011年

2 郭江;我國行政檢查裁量基準(zhǔn)制度之構(gòu)建研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1642606