發(fā)布時間：2018-03-17 09:48

  本文選題：新農(nóng)村　切入點：鄉(xiāng)村治理　出處：《南京師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：建國以來,以毛澤東同志為核心的黨的第一代中央領(lǐng)導(dǎo)集體初步確立了農(nóng)業(yè)的基礎(chǔ)地位；以鄧小平同志為核心的黨的第二代中央領(lǐng)導(dǎo)集體將農(nóng)村與改革開放聯(lián)系起來,打破了單一的經(jīng)濟模式,實行村民自治制度；以江澤民同志為核心的黨的第三代中央領(lǐng)導(dǎo)集體積極總結(jié)我國農(nóng)村改革和發(fā)展的經(jīng)驗,在“三個代表”重要思想的指導(dǎo)下,探索出了一條中國特色社會主義新農(nóng)村建設(shè)道路。21世紀(jì)以來,中國共產(chǎn)黨不斷調(diào)整“三農(nóng)”發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略,實行“工業(yè)反哺農(nóng)業(yè)”、“以城帶鄉(xiāng)”。2005年,黨的十六屆五中全會提出了建設(shè)“生產(chǎn)發(fā)展、生活寬裕、鄉(xiāng)風(fēng)文明、村容整潔、管理民主”的社會主義新農(nóng)村的重大歷史任務(wù)。截至2013年,中共中央連續(xù)十年一號文件聚焦“三農(nóng)”問題,不斷發(fā)展與創(chuàng)新社會主義新農(nóng)村建設(shè)的政策,充實黨的新農(nóng)村政策體系。黨的十八大也明確指出,解決好農(nóng)業(yè)農(nóng)村農(nóng)民問題是全黨工作重中之重,要推動城鄉(xiāng)發(fā)展一體化,深入推進(jìn)新農(nóng)村建設(shè)。 作為一項不斷發(fā)展與創(chuàng)新的系統(tǒng)工程,社會主義新農(nóng)村建設(shè)需要鄉(xiāng)村治理制度化建設(shè)的支持與推進(jìn),制度化的鄉(xiāng)村治理模式也為社會主義新農(nóng)村政策的實施提供了有利環(huán)境和可靠保障。因此,本文就是在社會主義新農(nóng)村建設(shè)的大背景下,筆者以江蘇省儀征市新城鎮(zhèn)工作近四年的一名大學(xué)生村官,運用理論聯(lián)系實際以及矛盾分析等研究方法,通過在鄉(xiāng)村第一線的調(diào)查和考察,思考與探索我國鄉(xiāng)村治理制度化的歷史與現(xiàn)狀,以及社會主義新農(nóng)村鄉(xiāng)村治理制度化所需要的制度內(nèi)容,并對鄉(xiāng)村治理過程中的問題展開“制度”層面的分析,從而提出“制度異化”的概念,并展其表現(xiàn),究其原因。 文章最后,筆者針對“制度異化”問題的種種表現(xiàn)和產(chǎn)生原因,立足現(xiàn)實,放眼未來,站在“制度創(chuàng)新”的角度,從“鄉(xiāng)村民主、鄉(xiāng)村法治、鄉(xiāng)村人才”三個方面提出了一系列的改革對策,諸如發(fā)展鄉(xiāng)村協(xié)商民主制度、呼應(yīng)《鄉(xiāng)級基層政府組織法》的出臺、實行特殊人才的加薪機制等,具有一定的現(xiàn)實意義與時代價值,也因應(yīng)了社會主義新農(nóng)村建設(shè)這一偉大工程的歷史使命。
[Abstract]:Since the founding of the people's Republic of China, the first generation of the Party's central leadership, with Comrade Mao Zedong as the core, has preliminarily established the basic position of agriculture, and the second generation of the Party's central leadership, with Comrade Deng Xiaoping as the core, has linked the rural areas to the reform and opening up. The Party's third-generation central leadership collective, with Comrade Jiang Zemin as the core, has actively summed up the experience of rural reform and development in our country, guided by the important thinking of "three represents." Since the beginning of the 21st century, the Communist Party of China has constantly adjusted the development strategy of "agriculture, rural areas and farmers", implemented "Industry feeding agriculture" and "taking cities and towns as villages". In 2005, The Fifth Plenary session of the 16 CPC Central Committee put forward a major historical task of building a new socialist countryside with "production and development, abundant living, civilization in the countryside, clean and tidy villages and democratic management." as of 2013, The first document of the CPC Central Committee has focused on the issue of "agriculture, countryside and farmers" for ten consecutive years, continuously developing and innovating the policy of building a new socialist countryside, and enriching the party's new rural policy system. The 18 CPC National Congress also clearly pointed out that. It is the most important task of the whole Party to solve the problem of agricultural rural farmers. It is necessary to promote the integration of urban and rural development and further promote the construction of new countryside. As a systematic project with continuous development and innovation, the construction of the new socialist countryside needs the support and promotion of the institutionalization of rural governance. The institutionalized rural governance mode also provides a favorable environment and reliable guarantee for the implementation of the new socialist rural policy. The author applies the research methods of combining theory with practice and contradiction analysis to a college student village official who has worked in new town of Yizheng city of Jiangsu Province for nearly four years, through the investigation and investigation on the first line of the village. Thinking and exploring the history and present situation of the institutionalization of rural governance in our country, as well as the institutional content needed for the institutionalization of rural governance in the new socialist countryside, and analyzing the problems in the process of rural governance from the perspective of "system". Thus, the concept of institutional alienation is put forward, and its manifestation and reasons are investigated. Finally, in view of the various manifestations and causes of the problem of "institutional alienation", the author bases himself on reality, looks at the future, stands at the angle of "system innovation", and from the angle of "rural democracy, rural rule of law," Three aspects of rural talents put forward a series of reform countermeasures, such as developing the rural consultative democracy, echoing the introduction of the Organic Law of the Grass-roots Government at the Township level, and implementing a salary increase mechanism for special talents, etc. It has certain realistic significance and the value of the times, and it also meets the historical mission of the great project of building a new socialist countryside.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D422.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 宋寶安,趙定東;鄉(xiāng)村治理:宗族組織與國家權(quán)力互動關(guān)系的歷史考察[J];長白學(xué)刊;2003年03期

2 趙業(yè)標(biāo);;重塑鄉(xiāng)村治理結(jié)構(gòu) 建設(shè)社會主義新農(nóng)村[J];經(jīng)濟與社會發(fā)展;2006年08期

3 趙曉峰;;新農(nóng)村建設(shè)的再思考——從“農(nóng)民主位”說起[J];中共寧波市委黨校學(xué)報;2008年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳宇;國家權(quán)力與社會權(quán)力協(xié)同下的鄉(xiāng)村治理研究[D];四川大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：1624200