本文關(guān)鍵詞： 重大 行政執(zhí)法決定 法制審核 審核制度 審核主體 審核程序 審核意見　出處：《四川師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)重大行政執(zhí)法決定法制審核是指外部法制機(jī)構(gòu)按照一定的程序和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)對(duì)重大行政執(zhí)法的過程和擬處理結(jié)果進(jìn)行合法性、合理性審查,并提出書面審核意見的一種行政行為。重大行政執(zhí)法決定法制審核是通過我國(guó)長(zhǎng)期行政執(zhí)法實(shí)踐的一大創(chuàng)舉,有利于健全重大行政執(zhí)法程序機(jī)制,根本目的是保障重大行政執(zhí)法嚴(yán)格、公正。重大行政執(zhí)法決定法制審核作為一種事前審核機(jī)制,不同于行政復(fù)議、行政訴訟、備案審查等事后審核機(jī)制;它具有獨(dú)特的屬性,必須遵循一定的原則,具有重要的社會(huì)價(jià)值。但是,由于制度不健全以及理論研究和實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)的欠缺,我國(guó)重大行政執(zhí)法決定法制審核還存在較多的問題。因此,需要從理論上進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)研究,建立健全重大行政執(zhí)法決定法制審核制度,為法制審核實(shí)踐提供理論和制度依據(jù)。本文采用實(shí)證和理論分析等方法嘗試著對(duì)相關(guān)理論進(jìn)行研究,為我國(guó)重大行政執(zhí)法決定法制審核制度的構(gòu)建和法制審核實(shí)踐提供理論支撐。筆者從以下五個(gè)方面展開研究。第一,介紹研究的背景、現(xiàn)狀與方法。第二,探討我國(guó)重大行政執(zhí)法決定法制審核的內(nèi)涵、與相關(guān)制度的區(qū)別、屬性、原則、主要內(nèi)容,為下文深入探討奠定理論基礎(chǔ)。第三,主要探討我國(guó)重大行政執(zhí)法決定法制審核的社會(huì)價(jià)值,包括維護(hù)執(zhí)法相對(duì)人權(quán)利、夯實(shí)政府合法性基礎(chǔ)、監(jiān)督執(zhí)法職責(zé)的履行、提升行政執(zhí)法公信力、加快建設(shè)法治政府、實(shí)現(xiàn)良好社會(huì)治理六個(gè)方面。重大行政執(zhí)法決定法制審核的社會(huì)價(jià)值,是構(gòu)建重大行政執(zhí)法決定法制審核制度的理論基礎(chǔ)和價(jià)值導(dǎo)向。第四,主要探討我國(guó)重大行政執(zhí)法決定法制審核存在的問題及其原因,這是構(gòu)建重大行政執(zhí)法決定法制審核制度的現(xiàn)實(shí)要求,可以有針對(duì)性的解決相關(guān)問題。第五,對(duì)我國(guó)重大行政執(zhí)法決定法制審核制度進(jìn)行構(gòu)想與展望,主要包括明確審核主體、完善審核程序、明確審核內(nèi)容、提出審核意見、追究審核責(zé)任五個(gè)方面。這是本文要解決的主要問題,是本文的主要?jiǎng)?chuàng)新點(diǎn)。
[Abstract]:China's major administrative law enforcement decisions legal review refers to the external legal institutions in accordance with certain procedures and standards of major administrative law enforcement process and intended to deal with the process of legitimacy, rationality review. And put forward written audit opinions of an administrative act. Major administrative law enforcement decisions legal review is through our long-term administrative law enforcement practice of a major initiative, conducive to the improvement of major administrative law enforcement procedures mechanism. The fundamental purpose is to ensure that the major administrative law enforcement is strict and fair. As a prior audit mechanism, the legal review of major administrative law enforcement decisions is different from the ex post audit mechanism such as administrative reconsideration, administrative litigation, record checking and so on. It has the unique attribute, must follow certain principle, has the important social value, but, because the system is not perfect and the theory research and the practice experience lacks. There are still many problems in the legal audit of major administrative law enforcement decisions in China. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct systematic research in theory to establish and improve the legal audit system of major administrative law enforcement decisions. To provide theoretical and institutional basis for the practice of legal audit. This paper uses empirical and theoretical analysis methods to try to study the relevant theories. This paper provides theoretical support for the construction and practice of the legal audit system of the major administrative law enforcement decision in China. Firstly, it introduces the background, current situation and methods of the research. Second, the author carries out the research from the following five aspects. This paper discusses the connotation, characteristics, principles and main contents of the legal audit of major administrative law enforcement decisions in China, and lays a theoretical foundation for the following in-depth discussion. This paper mainly discusses the social value of legal audit of major administrative law enforcement decisions in China, including safeguarding the rights of law enforcement counterpart, consolidating the legitimate foundation of the government, supervising the implementation of law enforcement duties, and enhancing the credibility of administrative law enforcement. Accelerate the construction of a government ruled by law to achieve good social governance in six aspects. Major administrative law enforcement determines the social value of legal audit. It is the theoretical basis and value orientation of establishing the legal audit system of major administrative law enforcement decision. 4th, it mainly discusses the problems and causes of the legal audit of major administrative law enforcement decision in our country. This is the realistic requirement of constructing the legal audit system of the major administrative law enforcement decision. It can solve the related problems. 5th, and the conception and prospect of the legal audit system of the major administrative law enforcement decision in our country. It mainly includes five aspects: clear audit subject, perfect audit procedure, clear audit content, put forward audit opinion, investigate audit responsibility. This is the main problem to be solved in this paper, and is the main innovation of this paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳馳;張駒;;行政復(fù)議的邏輯[J];四川師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年04期

2 張渝田;熊宇;;論依法行政的邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)[J];四川師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年04期

3 關(guān)保英;;論具體行政行為程序合法的內(nèi)涵與價(jià)值[J];政治與法律;2015年06期

4 黃學(xué)賢;;法治政府的內(nèi)在特征及其實(shí)現(xiàn)——《中共中央關(guān)于全面推進(jìn)依法治國(guó)若干重大問題的決定》解讀[J];江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué);2015年01期

5 雷磊;;法律程序?yàn)槭裁粗匾? 反思現(xiàn)代社會(huì)中程序與法治的關(guān)系[J];中外法學(xué);2014年02期

6 杜欣霖;;完善重大行政決策合法性審查機(jī)制[J];行政管理改革;2014年02期

7 姜曉萍;;國(guó)家治理現(xiàn)代化進(jìn)程中的社會(huì)治理體制創(chuàng)新[J];中國(guó)行政管理;2014年02期

8 劉貴祥;;漫談人民群眾看得見的司法公正[J];人民司法;2013年11期

9 陳鵬;;重大具體行政行為備案審查制度的規(guī)范闡釋[J];政治與法律;2012年05期

10 劉云甫;;重大行政許可備案審查的法律依據(jù)、不足及改進(jìn)[J];廣東行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1478249