本文關(guān)鍵詞： 法治話語(yǔ) 血“稠”定律 緣“分” 糾紛類型　出處：《江海學(xué)刊》2016年06期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：由于社會(huì)變遷及其導(dǎo)致的結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)型、利益調(diào)整與人口流動(dòng)等因素的影響,傳統(tǒng)中國(guó)社會(huì)中基于血緣、地緣、姻緣等疊加而形成的初級(jí)群體內(nèi)"諸緣合體"的情形發(fā)生了改變,從而削弱了初級(jí)關(guān)系自身的糾紛預(yù)防與化解功能。法治元素在被引入民間糾紛解決框架后,由于其事本主義及粗放型的特征,加之"合法性"不足,尚未得到人們的普遍認(rèn)可。在社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)尚未定型、社會(huì)安排尚未凝固的情況下,"緣"作為具有韌性的文化形態(tài)的價(jià)值不容忽視,仍然構(gòu)成社會(huì)秩序建構(gòu)的本土基礎(chǔ)。因而,"解紛"的宏觀制度安排應(yīng)當(dāng)形成一種多元格局,即在糾紛治理的法治話語(yǔ)下導(dǎo)入當(dāng)事人的(泛)血緣關(guān)系強(qiáng)度指標(biāo),強(qiáng)化對(duì)糾紛結(jié)構(gòu)中人際關(guān)系元素的考量。而藉此所建構(gòu)起的四種糾紛類型,則將不同的治理原則安頓于這一治理架構(gòu)的不同板塊中。這個(gè)分析框架聲張法律自身的道德與倫理基礎(chǔ),為糾紛治理提供了新的解釋和策略。
[Abstract]:Because of the influence of social change and its structural transformation, interest adjustment and population flow, the traditional Chinese society is based on blood, geography and so on. The situation of "conjunctions" in primary groups formed by the superposition of marriage has changed, thus weakening the function of dispute prevention and resolution of the primary relationship itself. The rule of law element has been introduced into the framework of folk dispute resolution. Due to its characteristics of the doctrine and extensive, coupled with the lack of "legitimacy", has not been universally recognized. In the case of the social structure has not yet been finalized, social arrangements have not yet solidified. The value of "fate" as a resilient cultural form can not be ignored and still forms the local foundation of the construction of social order. Therefore, the macro-institutional arrangement of "resolving disputes" should form a pluralistic pattern. That is, under the rule of law discourse of dispute governance, the (universal) blood relationship intensity index of the parties is introduced to strengthen the consideration of interpersonal relationship elements in the dispute structure, and the four types of disputes constructed by this method. Then the different principles of governance are settled in different sections of the governance structure. This analytical framework reveals the moral and ethical basis of the law itself and provides a new explanation and strategy for dispute management.
【作者單位】： 上海社會(huì)科學(xué)院社會(huì)學(xué)研究所;
【分類號(hào)】：D920.0
【正文快照】： 在當(dāng)下中國(guó),伴隨著急劇的社會(huì)變遷,民間糾紛特別國(guó)家”列為國(guó)策,使得糾紛的研究與治理帶有濃厚的法治是熟人間的糾紛大量涌現(xiàn),常常使社會(huì)陷入焦灼與困頓。導(dǎo)向,強(qiáng)調(diào)倚重正式規(guī)則的司法中心主義不斷確立。二糾紛是與人類社會(huì)相伴而生的一種社會(huì)現(xiàn)象,一般來說,是治理策略的多元，

本文編號(hào)：1470470