本文關鍵詞：流域協(xié)同治理的主體動力研究　出處：《湘潭大學》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關文章： 流域 協(xié)同治理 主體 動力

【摘要】：隨著“推進國家治理體系和治理能力現(xiàn)代化”這一全面深化改革總目標的提出,積極探索適合中國國情的新型社會治理模式刻不容緩。水資源短缺和流域水污染是我國面臨的重要環(huán)境問題,流域治理一直是學界關注的重點課題。流域協(xié)同治理能有效解決行政區(qū)域分割導致的流域分段式管理模式下用水和排污矛盾。當前形勢下,政府是流域協(xié)同治理的主導力量,受中央政策導向牽引,在地區(qū)競爭加劇的背景下,以行政轉型與治理變革為契機,以理論創(chuàng)新和信息技術進步為支撐,快步加入?yún)f(xié)同治理的行列;企業(yè)是流域協(xié)同治理的中堅力量,抓住政府失靈與改革放權的先機,有強大的資金與技術網作為支撐;第三部門則在民主政治的強大呼聲中,受到參與公共治理這一目標與使命的牽引,成為流域協(xié)同治理中不可忽視的新興力量。然而,協(xié)同治理尚未呈現(xiàn)完美的制度設計,流域治理各主體均存在動力缺失現(xiàn)象,有待理性反思。政府方面,信任危機、地區(qū)保護主義、不合理的政績觀與考核體系給流域協(xié)同治理帶來考驗;企業(yè)方面,其天生的逐利性與協(xié)同治理公共性產生沖突,管理體制與組織文化的局囿也導致協(xié)同治理困局;第三部門則深受政府管制,資金來源不足、專業(yè)水平差,社會監(jiān)督缺乏導致的信息不透明也削減了其參與流域協(xié)同治理的動力。針對流域治理主體動力缺失問題,在對其成因進行深入剖析的基礎上提出動力激發(fā)與維護的具體措施:要提升中央政府的全局調控能力、厘清政府間利益糾葛、完善政績考核與官員晉升體系,切實優(yōu)化地方政府合作體系;要增進公共部門民營化改革,培育政企良好的合作形式,夯實政企合作基礎;要明晰政社職能邊界,拓展政社合作領域,深化政社合作內容;還要通過創(chuàng)新主體培育機制、文化心理認同機制、法制保障機制等來強化流域協(xié)同治理合力。
[Abstract]:With the overall goal of "promoting the modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity", the overall goal of deepening the reform has been put forward. It is urgent to explore a new mode of social governance suitable for China's national conditions. Water shortage and river basin water pollution are important environmental problems facing our country. Watershed management has been the focus of academic attention. Watershed collaborative management can effectively solve the conflict between water and sewage caused by administrative division of the watershed management mode. Under the current situation. The government is the leading force of watershed coordinated governance, guided by central policy, under the background of intensified regional competition, administrative transformation and governance reform as an opportunity, theoretical innovation and information technology progress as the support. Quick step into the ranks of cooperative governance; Enterprises are the backbone of river basin coordinated management, seize the first opportunity of government failure and reform decentralization, have strong funds and technical network as the support; The third sector is driven by the goal and mission of participating in public governance in the strong voice of democratic politics and has become a new force which can not be ignored in the collaborative management of river basin. Coordinated governance has not yet presented a perfect system design, the main body of river basin governance has the phenomenon of lack of power, need to be rational reflection. Government, trust crisis, regional protectionism. Unreasonable political achievement view and appraisal system bring the test to the river basin coordinated management; In the aspect of enterprises, the inherent pursuit of profit and the publicity of cooperative governance have conflicts, and the management system and organizational culture also lead to the difficulties of collaborative governance. The third sector is heavily regulated by the government, with insufficient sources of funds and poor professional standards. The lack of information transparency caused by the lack of social supervision also reduces its participation in collaborative watershed governance. On the basis of in-depth analysis of its causes, this paper puts forward specific measures to stimulate and maintain the motive force: to enhance the overall control ability of the central government, to clarify the inter-governmental interests disputes, and to improve the system of performance assessment and promotion of officials. To optimize the cooperation system of local government; It is necessary to promote the privatization reform of the public sector, cultivate a good form of cooperation between government and enterprises, and consolidate the foundation of cooperation between government and enterprises; It is necessary to clarify the functional boundaries of the political and social cooperation, expand the scope of cooperation and deepen the contents of the cooperation; It is also necessary to strengthen the synergy of watershed management by innovating the cultivation mechanism of the subject, the mechanism of cultural psychological identity, the mechanism of legal guarantee, and so on.
【學位授予單位】：湘潭大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D630

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 李正升;;從行政分割到協(xié)同治理:我國流域水污染治理機制創(chuàng)新[J];學術探索;2014年09期

2 劉春湘;李樂;;湘江流域協(xié)同治理缺失分析與因應之策[J];湖南師范大學社會科學學報;2014年03期

3 譚學良;李巧霞;;協(xié)同文化、合作技能與整體責任:政府協(xié)同軟動量之三角關系場域[J];武漢理工大學學報(社會科學版);2014年02期

4 陳星平;;新媒體時代地方治理創(chuàng)新中的技術化傾向[J];行政論壇;2014年02期

5 唐亞林;;國家治理在中國的登場及其方法論價值[J];復旦學報(社會科學版);2014年02期

6 李恒;黃雯;;企業(yè)逐利行為與社會責任行為關系研究[J];四川師范大學學報(社會科學版);2014年02期

7 ;中共中央關于全面深化改革若干重大問題的決定(2013年11月12日中國共產黨第十八屆中央委員會第三次全體會議通過)[J];求是;2013年22期

8 任澤濤;嚴國萍;;協(xié)同治理的社會基礎及其實現(xiàn)機制——一項多案例研究[J];上海行政學院學報;2013年05期

9 韋彬;;整體性治理分析框架下的府際關系建構研究[J];學術論壇;2013年06期

10 張宇;劉偉忠;;地方政府與社會組織的協(xié)同治理:功能阻滯及創(chuàng)新路徑[J];南京社會科學;2013年05期

相關會議論文 前1條

1 雷鳴;秦普豐;鐵柏清;;湖南湘江流域重金屬污染的現(xiàn)狀與分析[A];第三屆全國農業(yè)環(huán)境科學學術研討會論文集[C];2009年

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 侯琳良;顏珂;;湘江治理,掛上“國”字號[N];人民日報;2011年

相關博士學位論文 前2條

1 王艷麗;城市社區(qū)協(xié)同治理動力機制研究[D];吉林大學;2012年

2 劉光容;政府協(xié)同治理：機制、實施與效率分析[D];華中師范大學;2008年

，

本文編號：1410248