論英國政府績效管理改革及其價值啟示
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-19 17:22
【摘要】：隨著新公共管理運(yùn)動的不斷發(fā)展,績效管理作為一種新的管理理念和方法,已逐漸成為當(dāng)今西方各國實施政府再造、落實政府責(zé)任,以及改進(jìn)和評價政府管理行之有效的工具。在我國,公共部門績效管理水平與發(fā)達(dá)國家還有一定的間距,建立和完善符合我國國情、適應(yīng)科學(xué)發(fā)展觀要求的政府績效評估體系,是當(dāng)前和今后一段時期我國行政管理體制改革、服務(wù)型政府建設(shè)的重要內(nèi)容,也是我國公共管理研究的重大課題。1979年,撒切爾夫人作為新右派的代表在競選中獲勝,在她上臺之初,便嘗試將私營部門的管理經(jīng)驗和方法運(yùn)用于政府管理之中。在這種情況下,績效管理被視為一種能夠有效提高政府績效的手段,開始投入到政府管理中來。撒切爾夫人時期政府績效管理改革的主要目標(biāo):效率邏輯;梅杰時期政府績效管理改革的主要目標(biāo):責(zé)任標(biāo)準(zhǔn)邏輯;布萊爾時期政府績效管理改革的主要目標(biāo):最佳價值邏輯。這些政府績效管理改革進(jìn)一步提高了英國政府的權(quán)威性,為英國政府提供了新的發(fā)展動力。盡管英國政府績效管理取得了相當(dāng)成就,但同時也存在著許多不足之處:政治體制對績效執(zhí)行的影響、工作人員的“自利”行為、績效評估的就事論事問題等等。英國政府作為公共部門績效管理改革的先驅(qū)者,其成功的經(jīng)驗和教訓(xùn)對于我們國家的行政體制改革都有重要的啟發(fā)價值:政府的績效管理改革需要有法律保障、要建立合理的績效評估指標(biāo)體系、注重培育績效文化和績效意識、營造開放的績效管理環(huán)境、完善績效管理中的公民參與機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:With the development of the new public management movement, performance management, as a new management concept and method, has gradually become an effective tool for the implementation of government reengineering, the implementation of government responsibility, and the improvement and evaluation of government management in western countries. In China, there is a certain gap between the performance management level of the public sector and the developed countries. It is necessary to establish and perfect the government performance evaluation system, which conforms to the national conditions of our country and meets the requirements of the scientific concept of development. It is an important part of the reform of the administrative system and the construction of a service-oriented government in our country at present and for a period of time to come. It is also a major subject in the study of public administration in our country. In 1979, Mrs. Thatcher, as a representative of the New Rightists, won the election. At the beginning of her reign, she tried to apply private sector management experience and methods to government management. In this case, performance management is regarded as an effective means to improve the performance of the government, began to invest in government management. The main objectives of the government performance management reform in Thatcher's period are efficiency logic; the main objectives of the government performance management reform in Major period: the logic of responsibility standards; the main goal of the government performance management reform in Blair's period: the logic of optimal value. These government performance management reforms have further enhanced the authority of the British government and provided a new impetus for its development. Although the British government has made considerable achievements in performance management, there are also many shortcomings: the influence of political system on performance implementation, the "self-interest" behavior of staff members, the problem of performance evaluation and so on. As the forerunner of the public sector performance management reform, the British government's successful experience and lessons have important enlightening value for our country's administrative system reform: the government's performance management reform needs to be guaranteed by law. It is necessary to establish a reasonable performance evaluation index system, pay attention to cultivating performance culture and performance consciousness, create an open performance management environment, and perfect the mechanism of citizen participation in performance management.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國礦業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D756.1
本文編號：2342938
[Abstract]:With the development of the new public management movement, performance management, as a new management concept and method, has gradually become an effective tool for the implementation of government reengineering, the implementation of government responsibility, and the improvement and evaluation of government management in western countries. In China, there is a certain gap between the performance management level of the public sector and the developed countries. It is necessary to establish and perfect the government performance evaluation system, which conforms to the national conditions of our country and meets the requirements of the scientific concept of development. It is an important part of the reform of the administrative system and the construction of a service-oriented government in our country at present and for a period of time to come. It is also a major subject in the study of public administration in our country. In 1979, Mrs. Thatcher, as a representative of the New Rightists, won the election. At the beginning of her reign, she tried to apply private sector management experience and methods to government management. In this case, performance management is regarded as an effective means to improve the performance of the government, began to invest in government management. The main objectives of the government performance management reform in Thatcher's period are efficiency logic; the main objectives of the government performance management reform in Major period: the logic of responsibility standards; the main goal of the government performance management reform in Blair's period: the logic of optimal value. These government performance management reforms have further enhanced the authority of the British government and provided a new impetus for its development. Although the British government has made considerable achievements in performance management, there are also many shortcomings: the influence of political system on performance implementation, the "self-interest" behavior of staff members, the problem of performance evaluation and so on. As the forerunner of the public sector performance management reform, the British government's successful experience and lessons have important enlightening value for our country's administrative system reform: the government's performance management reform needs to be guaranteed by law. It is necessary to establish a reasonable performance evaluation index system, pay attention to cultivating performance culture and performance consciousness, create an open performance management environment, and perfect the mechanism of citizen participation in performance management.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國礦業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D756.1
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 薄貴利;;構(gòu)建服務(wù)型政府績效管理體制[J];中國行政管理;2012年10期
2 譚萬霞;;西方法治思想對我國現(xiàn)代法治建設(shè)的啟示[J];行政與法;2010年06期
3 卓越;趙蕾;;績效評估:政府績效管理系統(tǒng)中的元工具[J];公共管理研究;2008年00期
4 王佳緯;屠瑾;;價值、難點(diǎn)與路徑:對公眾參與政府績效評估的思考[J];中共杭州市委黨校學(xué)報;2007年05期
5 李林襁;宋偉;;政府績效管理程序與過程研究[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)理人;2006年12期
6 徐雙敏;;政府績效管理的特點(diǎn)研究[J];學(xué)習(xí)與實踐;2006年04期
7 蘭青;關(guān)于政府績效管理的思考[J];北京城市學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年03期
8 臧乃康;政府績效評估價值與和諧社會的契合[J];探索;2005年04期
9 吳建南,溫挺挺;政府績效立法分析:以美國《政府績效與結(jié)果法案》為例[J];中國行政管理;2004年09期
10 賈凌民;21世紀(jì)的公共管理:政府管理理念轉(zhuǎn)變與創(chuàng)新[J];中國行政管理;2004年06期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 錢云杰;中英政府績效管理制度比較研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2009年
2 楊玲;當(dāng)代英國地方政府公共服務(wù)探討[D];華中師范大學(xué);2006年
，本文編號：2342938
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/guojizhengzhilunwen/2342938.html
