【摘要】：世界上任何事物都有其對(duì)立面，全球化也是如此。自20世紀(jì)90年代以來(lái)，當(dāng)全球化的力量在全球范圍內(nèi)迅速推進(jìn)之時(shí)，一股反全球化的力量也像幽靈一樣在世界各地蔓延，二者形影相隨，相互斗爭(zhēng)。自1999年底西雅圖風(fēng)暴拉開(kāi)反全球化運(yùn)動(dòng)的序幕之后，其很快成為國(guó)際政治舞臺(tái)上一支極為活躍的力量，從瑞士的達(dá)沃斯到法國(guó)的尼斯，從美國(guó)的紐約到加拿大的魁北克，從泰國(guó)的曼谷到巴西的阿雷格里港，到處都留下了反全球化運(yùn)動(dòng)活動(dòng)者的足跡。作為抗議性政治，反全球化運(yùn)動(dòng)的規(guī)模和場(chǎng)景讓人極易聯(lián)想到20世紀(jì)60年代末以來(lái)在西方社會(huì)掀起的新社會(huì)運(yùn)動(dòng)。那么，二者究竟有何關(guān)系? 本文把反全球化運(yùn)動(dòng)看作是新社會(huì)運(yùn)動(dòng)在全球化背景下的一種表現(xiàn)形式，選擇新社會(huì)運(yùn)動(dòng)理論的視角對(duì)反全球化運(yùn)動(dòng)的內(nèi)在結(jié)構(gòu)、運(yùn)行方式及其影響因素進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)的分析。筆者認(rèn)為反全球化運(yùn)動(dòng)不僅是新社會(huì)運(yùn)動(dòng)在新的國(guó)際背景下的一種延續(xù)與發(fā)展，是“新——新社會(huì)運(yùn)動(dòng)”，同時(shí)，它也對(duì)新社會(huì)運(yùn)動(dòng)理論的進(jìn)一步發(fā)展提出了挑戰(zhàn)。 文章共有6部分組成，各部分的主要觀點(diǎn)如下： 導(dǎo)言部分，對(duì)選題的原因及意義、目前國(guó)內(nèi)外的研究狀況進(jìn)行述評(píng)，同時(shí)對(duì)本文的框架進(jìn)行了設(shè)計(jì)。 20世紀(jì)末，國(guó)際社會(huì)掀起的反全球化運(yùn)動(dòng)浪潮備受世人關(guān)注，一時(shí)也成為學(xué)術(shù)界研究的熱點(diǎn)，本文選擇新社會(huì)運(yùn)動(dòng)理論的視角來(lái)分析反全球化運(yùn)動(dòng)是出于以下幾點(diǎn)考慮：一是作為二戰(zhàn)后西方國(guó)家出現(xiàn)的一種“新政治”現(xiàn)象，，新社會(huì)運(yùn)動(dòng)——反全球化運(yùn)動(dòng)是理解歐美社會(huì)變化的一條重要線索。二是作為反體系運(yùn)動(dòng)，新社會(huì)運(yùn)動(dòng)與反全球化運(yùn)動(dòng)有很多相似之處。三是選擇新社會(huì)運(yùn)動(dòng)的視角來(lái)研究反全球化運(yùn)動(dòng)，不僅有助于理解在全球治理的國(guó)際背景下，基層民眾如何表達(dá)自己的利益訴求以維護(hù)其政治權(quán)利和經(jīng)濟(jì)利益，而且也有助于從一個(gè)側(cè)面增強(qiáng)對(duì)跨國(guó)社會(huì)運(yùn)動(dòng)的理解和認(rèn)識(shí)。四是出于學(xué)科上的考慮。就新社會(huì)運(yùn)動(dòng)的研究狀況而言，西方學(xué)者的研究較為全面，成果比較豐富，概括地講，主要集中在三個(gè)層面：即對(duì)新社會(huì)運(yùn)動(dòng)抗議事件的研究；關(guān)于如何闡釋新社會(huì)運(yùn)動(dòng)的理論研究；對(duì)新社會(huì)運(yùn)動(dòng)研究方法的研究。在國(guó)內(nèi)，就總體而言，學(xué)術(shù)界(尤其是政治學(xué)領(lǐng)域)對(duì)新社會(huì)運(yùn)動(dòng)的研究仍極其薄弱。對(duì)于反全球化運(yùn)動(dòng)，國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者雖在為什么反全球化，怎樣反全球化等問(wèn)題上達(dá)成了諸多共識(shí)，但從新社會(huì)運(yùn)動(dòng)的視角來(lái)分析研
[Abstract]:Everything in the world has its opposite, and so does globalization. Since the 1990s, when the forces of globalization are rapidly advancing in the global scope, an anti-globalization force has spread all over the world like a ghost. Since the beginning of the anti-globalization campaign by the Seattle Storm at the end of 1999, it has quickly become an extremely active force on the international political scene, from Davos in Switzerland to Nice in France, from New York in the United States to Quebec in Canada. From Bangkok, Thailand, to Porto Alegre, Brazil, anti-globalisation activists have been left behind. As a protest politics, the scale and scene of the anti-globalization movement is very easy to think of the new social movement in the western society since the late 1960s. So, what is the relationship between the two? This paper regards the anti-globalization movement as a form of expression of the new social movement under the background of globalization, and makes a systematic analysis of the internal structure, operation mode and influencing factors of the anti-globalization movement from the perspective of the new social movement theory. The author holds that the anti-globalization movement is not only a continuation and development of the new social movement under the new international background, but also a "new and new social movement". At the same time, it also challenges the further development of the theory of the new social movement. There are six parts of the article, the main points of view are as follows: introduction, the reasons and significance of the topic, the current research situation at home and abroad are reviewed. At the same time, the frame of this paper is designed. At the end of the 20th century, the wave of anti-globalization movement set off by the international community attracted the attention of the world, and it also became a hot spot in academic research. This article chooses the new social movement theory angle to analyze the anti-globalization movement is out of the following considerations: first, as a "new politics" phenomenon in western countries after World War II, New social movement-anti-globalization movement is an important clue to understand the social changes in Europe and America. Second, as an anti-system movement, the new social movement and anti-globalization movement have many similarities. Third, choosing the perspective of the new social movement to study the anti-globalization movement will not only help to understand how the grassroots people express their interests in order to safeguard their political and economic interests in the international context of global governance. It also helps to enhance the understanding and understanding of transnational social movements from one side. Fourth, out of disciplinary considerations. As far as the research situation of the new social movement is concerned, the research of the western scholars is more comprehensive and fruitful. Generally speaking, it mainly focuses on three aspects: the research on the protest event of the new social movement; How to explain the theory of the new social movement and the research methods of the new social movement. At home, in general, the study of the new social movement in academia (especially in the field of political science) is still extremely weak. For the anti-globalization movement, domestic and foreign scholars have reached a lot of consensus on why and how to oppose globalization, but from the perspective of the new social movement to analyze the research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號(hào)】：D50

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 徐步華;全球治理視角下的冷戰(zhàn)后跨國(guó)社會(huì)運(yùn)動(dòng)研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2012年

2 郭晨星;全球環(huán)境治理主體結(jié)構(gòu)模型建構(gòu)及經(jīng)驗(yàn)驗(yàn)證[D];山東大學(xué);2010年

3 陸海燕;運(yùn)動(dòng)與政治的邏輯[D];武漢大學(xué);2009年

4 楊悅;20世紀(jì)70年代以來(lái)美國(guó)左、右翼社會(huì)運(yùn)動(dòng)的政治過(guò)程比較研究[D];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 陳媛;時(shí)代變遷與觀念歷程：美國(guó)新左派現(xiàn)象的社會(huì)根源與社會(huì)功能分析[D];暨南大學(xué);2007年

2 朱娜;新世紀(jì)中國(guó)大陸群體性事件輿論傳播研究[D];河北大學(xué);2010年

本文編號(hào)：2312904