1920年代后期殖民地朝鮮對(duì)馬克思主義的接受情況及其意義——以《朝鮮之光》的“唯物-唯心”論戰(zhàn)為例
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-10-29 19:17
【摘要】:朝鮮自1919年三一運(yùn)動(dòng)之后,人們對(duì)社會(huì)主義思想的關(guān)注日益增加。一些從日本留學(xué)回來(lái)的知識(shí)分子為了主導(dǎo)理論陣地,主要以《朝鮮之光》這一期刊平臺(tái)發(fā)表多篇文章對(duì)"唯物-唯心"進(jìn)行論戰(zhàn)。通過(guò)些論戰(zhàn),主導(dǎo)者主張清除朝鮮社會(huì)主義運(yùn)動(dòng)中的馬克思主義修正主義思想,同時(shí)他們一方面承認(rèn)"民族統(tǒng)一戰(zhàn)線",一方面積極展開(kāi)論戰(zhàn)要求貫徹實(shí)施無(wú)產(chǎn)階級(jí)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán),從而意圖確保社會(huì)主義運(yùn)動(dòng)的階級(jí)獨(dú)立性。這些論戰(zhàn)文章重視人類主體意識(shí)的唯心主義立場(chǎng),強(qiáng)調(diào)人類的變革意志及需求的唯物主義立場(chǎng),強(qiáng)調(diào)生產(chǎn)力是歷史發(fā)展的終極決定因素的唯物主義立場(chǎng)。這些論戰(zhàn)具有其歷史意義:唯物-唯心論戰(zhàn)并不是抽象的哲學(xué)爭(zhēng)論,而是民族統(tǒng)一戰(zhàn)線"新干會(huì)"成立以后在社會(huì)主義者之間的路線對(duì)立,以及新干會(huì)內(nèi)部民族主義與社會(huì)主義之間爭(zhēng)奪主導(dǎo)權(quán)的政治背景下展開(kāi)的實(shí)踐性論戰(zhàn);同時(shí),論戰(zhàn)這使得馬克思列寧主義迅速得以接收傳播。
[Abstract]:Since the March 1 Movement in 1919, people have paid more and more attention to socialist thought. In order to dominate the theoretical position, some intellectuals who returned from studying in Japan mainly published several articles on "materialist idealism" on the platform of "the Light of Korea". Through some controversy, the leaders advocated the elimination of Marxist revisionism in the Korean socialist movement, and on the one hand they recognized the "national United front" and, on the other hand, they actively launched the debate to demand the implementation of the proletarian leadership. It was intended to ensure the class independence of the socialist movement. These articles attach importance to the idealist standpoint of human subject consciousness, emphasize the materialist standpoint of human will to change and demand, and emphasize that productivity is the ultimate determinant of historical development. These debates have historical significance: the war of materialism and idealism is not an abstract philosophical argument, but rather the opposition of the line between the socialists after the founding of the National United Front "New cadres". And the practical controversy between nationalism and socialism in the political background of leadership; At the same time, the controversy made it possible for Marxism-Leninism to receive and spread quickly.
【作者單位】: 韓國(guó)建國(guó)大學(xué)統(tǒng)一人文學(xué)研究院;南京大學(xué)外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院韓語(yǔ)系;南京大學(xué)外語(yǔ)學(xué)院韓語(yǔ)系;
【分類號(hào)】:D731.25
,
本文編號(hào):2298564
[Abstract]:Since the March 1 Movement in 1919, people have paid more and more attention to socialist thought. In order to dominate the theoretical position, some intellectuals who returned from studying in Japan mainly published several articles on "materialist idealism" on the platform of "the Light of Korea". Through some controversy, the leaders advocated the elimination of Marxist revisionism in the Korean socialist movement, and on the one hand they recognized the "national United front" and, on the other hand, they actively launched the debate to demand the implementation of the proletarian leadership. It was intended to ensure the class independence of the socialist movement. These articles attach importance to the idealist standpoint of human subject consciousness, emphasize the materialist standpoint of human will to change and demand, and emphasize that productivity is the ultimate determinant of historical development. These debates have historical significance: the war of materialism and idealism is not an abstract philosophical argument, but rather the opposition of the line between the socialists after the founding of the National United Front "New cadres". And the practical controversy between nationalism and socialism in the political background of leadership; At the same time, the controversy made it possible for Marxism-Leninism to receive and spread quickly.
【作者單位】: 韓國(guó)建國(guó)大學(xué)統(tǒng)一人文學(xué)研究院;南京大學(xué)外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院韓語(yǔ)系;南京大學(xué)外語(yǔ)學(xué)院韓語(yǔ)系;
【分類號(hào)】:D731.25
,
本文編號(hào):2298564
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/guojizhengzhilunwen/2298564.html
最近更新
教材專著
熱點(diǎn)文章