冷戰(zhàn)后英國的俄羅斯研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-15 15:31
【摘要】：英國學(xué)界對俄羅斯研究的歷史超過400年,積累了豐富的研究經(jīng)驗,著名學(xué)者和優(yōu)秀成果如恒河沙數(shù)。冷戰(zhàn)結(jié)束之后,英國學(xué)者圍繞著俄羅斯轉(zhuǎn)型問題,依然刻苦鉆研,筆耕不輟。在諸多前沿學(xué)術(shù)問題上都提出了自己卓越的見解,為國際斯拉夫研究的發(fā)展做出了巨大貢獻(xiàn)。其高水平的研究在協(xié)助英國政府制定外交政策方面發(fā)揮了重要作用,甚至對于當(dāng)代國際格局的演變也產(chǎn)生了微妙的影響。 本課題主要研究的是冷戰(zhàn)后英國學(xué)術(shù)界對于俄羅斯與蘇聯(lián)問題的研究狀況,是一項對于特定歷史時期,特定領(lǐng)域基本研究狀況的分析、綜合與評價。本課題的研究主旨是在了解英國俄羅斯研究的發(fā)展歷史和當(dāng)代概況的基礎(chǔ)上,通過考察英國學(xué)術(shù)界在冷戰(zhàn)結(jié)束后20多年來在俄羅斯與蘇聯(lián)的政治轉(zhuǎn)型、經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型、歷史和外交等領(lǐng)域的主要研究成果,分析英國俄羅斯研究界的基本思想傾向、理論觀點、研究方法和分析路徑。通過多種研究方法,對相關(guān)的學(xué)術(shù)成果進(jìn)行解讀和概括,并最終形成對冷戰(zhàn)后英國俄羅斯研究狀況的整體認(rèn)知與綜合評價。 本文共分為七章,首先對英國俄羅斯研究的發(fā)展歷史進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)梳理,隨后對冷戰(zhàn)后英國俄羅斯研究的主要成果分門別類進(jìn)行深度分析,最后對冷戰(zhàn)后英國俄羅斯研究的主要特點和思想譜系進(jìn)行概括。 第一章為緒論部分,主要敘述了本課題的源起,以及本課題在學(xué)術(shù)史、理論研究和外交實踐等多個層面的重要意義。對于本課題的國際、國內(nèi)研究現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了比較全面的總結(jié),同時對本課題研究中資料搜集的主要方法,基本的分析路徑和全文的研究框架進(jìn)行了介紹。 第二章為英國俄羅斯研究概況,包括英國俄羅斯研究的歷史沿革和冷戰(zhàn)后英國俄羅斯研究的基本狀況兩個部分�；仡櫫藦�16世紀(jì)至今英國俄羅斯研究的發(fā)展歷程,介紹了不同時期具有代表性的學(xué)者和著作。然后對當(dāng)代英國俄羅斯研究的狀況進(jìn)行了重點分析,分別對當(dāng)代英國學(xué)術(shù)界的主要研究機(jī)構(gòu),主流學(xué)者,主要學(xué)術(shù)刊物進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)介紹,并且通過定量研究的方式對于冷戰(zhàn)后英國學(xué)術(shù)界的研究領(lǐng)域和研究議題的變化情況進(jìn)行了剖析。 第三章為冷戰(zhàn)后英國的俄羅斯政治轉(zhuǎn)型研究。在概括了冷戰(zhàn)后英國學(xué)者對俄羅斯政治轉(zhuǎn)型問題的整體研究狀況的基礎(chǔ)上,以主要的研究議題為線索,對于當(dāng)代英國學(xué)者的觀點進(jìn)行了總結(jié)。對蘇聯(lián)解體,轉(zhuǎn)型時期俄羅斯政治體制和普京時代等問題進(jìn)行了重點介紹,對于相關(guān)問題中所出現(xiàn)的不同觀點進(jìn)行了解釋。 第四章為冷戰(zhàn)后英國的俄羅斯經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型研究。根據(jù)英國學(xué)者思想理念的差異,以對比的方式分析了英國學(xué)術(shù)界對于俄羅斯經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型的兩種競爭與對立的觀點。主流的英國學(xué)者以新自由主義的視角出發(fā),以市場化、自由化為俄羅斯經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型的主要目標(biāo),并以此為據(jù)對于俄羅斯經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型進(jìn)程進(jìn)行評價。而左翼學(xué)者則堅持新馬克思主義的研究視角,將平等、社會利益和經(jīng)濟(jì)自主等要素作為評價俄羅斯經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型的基本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。 第五章為冷戰(zhàn)后英國的俄羅斯歷史研究。歷史研究是英國學(xué)術(shù)界的重要傳統(tǒng),歷史學(xué)方法也是英國俄羅斯研究的基本方法之一。英國歷史學(xué)家們積極參與到轉(zhuǎn)型研究中,利用歷史學(xué)的研究視角對于蘇聯(lián)解體和俄羅斯轉(zhuǎn)型進(jìn)行解讀,并且得出了非常具有預(yù)見性的重要理論觀點。本章以“帝國”理論為核心,對歷史研究的內(nèi)容進(jìn)行了介紹。 第六章為冷戰(zhàn)后英國的俄羅斯外交研究。在英國俄羅斯研究領(lǐng)域,對于俄羅斯外交問題的研究比較有代表性的觀點多與智庫機(jī)構(gòu)有關(guān),他們憑借著熟悉外交事務(wù),掌握豐富的第一手資料等優(yōu)勢,在俄羅斯外交研究領(lǐng)域取得了非常豐富且有價值的研究成果。本章根據(jù)不同議題所涉及的內(nèi)容,對冷戰(zhàn)后英國學(xué)者對俄羅斯外交的研究進(jìn)行了概述。 第七章為結(jié)論部分。在對政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、歷史和外交等領(lǐng)域的全面分析之后,這一部分對整個冷戰(zhàn)后英國的俄羅斯研究領(lǐng)域的思想譜系和時代特征進(jìn)行了概括,并且對整個英國的俄羅斯研究給予評價,對于英國俄羅斯研究的主要優(yōu)點和存在的缺陷進(jìn)行總結(jié),最終提出適當(dāng)?shù)难芯拷Y(jié)論。
[Abstract]:After the end of the Cold War, British scholars have been working hard on the issue of Russian transformation. They have put forward their own remarkable views on many frontier academic issues, and have contributed to the international Slar. His high-level research has played an important role in helping the British government formulate foreign policy, and even had a subtle impact on the evolution of contemporary international patterns.
This topic mainly studies the research situation of the Russian and Soviet Union in the British academic circles after the Cold War, is an analysis, synthesis and evaluation of the basic research situation of the specific historical period and specific fields. In the past 20 years after the end of the Cold War, the British academia has made major research achievements in the fields of political transformation, economic transformation, history and diplomacy between Russia and the Soviet Union, and has analyzed the basic ideological tendency, theoretical viewpoints, research methods and analysis paths of the British and Russian research circles. Finally, a comprehensive cognition and comprehensive evaluation of the research situation of the United Kingdom and Russia after the cold war is concluded.
This paper is divided into seven chapters. Firstly, the history of British Russian studies is systematically reviewed. Then, the main achievements of British Russian studies after the cold war are analyzed in depth. Finally, the main characteristics and ideological pedigree of British Russian studies after the cold war are summarized.
The first chapter is the introduction part, which mainly describes the origin of the subject and the significance of the subject in academic history, theoretical research and diplomatic practice. The research framework of this paper is introduced.
The second chapter is the general situation of British Russian studies, including the historical evolution of British Russian studies and the basic situation of British Russian studies after the Cold War. This paper focuses on the analysis of the current situation, introduces in detail the main research institutions, mainstream scholars, and major academic journals in contemporary British academia, and analyzes the changes of research fields and topics in British academia after the Cold War through quantitative research.
The third chapter is the study of the political transformation of Russia in Britain after the cold war.On the basis of summarizing the overall research situation of the British scholars on the political transformation of Russia after the cold war,the author summarizes the views of the contemporary British scholars with the clue of the main research topics. The generation and other issues were highlighted, and different views emerged in the related issues were explained.
Chapter Four is the study of the economic transformation of Russia in Britain after the Cold War. According to the differences of the ideas of British scholars, this paper analyzes the two competing and opposing views of the British academia on the economic transformation of Russia in a comparative way. While the left-wing scholars insist on the perspective of new Marxism and regard equality, social interests and economic autonomy as the basic criteria for evaluating Russian economic transformation.
The fifth chapter is the study of Russian history in Britain after the Cold War.The study of history is an important tradition in British academia and the method of historiography is one of the basic methods in the study of Britain and Russia.British historians actively participate in the study of transformation and interpret the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the transformation of Russia from the perspective of historiography. This chapter introduces the content of historical research with the theory of Empire as the core.
Chapter Six is the study of Russian diplomacy in Britain after the Cold War. In the field of British-Russian studies, the representative viewpoints on Russian diplomacy are mostly related to think tanks. With the advantages of being familiar with foreign affairs and having abundant first-hand information, they have made very rich achievements in the field of Russian diplomacy. According to the contents of different topics, this chapter summarizes the research of British scholars on Russian diplomacy after the Cold War.
Chapter VII is the conclusion. After a comprehensive analysis of the political, economic, historical and diplomatic fields, this part summarizes the ideological pedigree and characteristics of the whole post-Cold War British Russian research field, and evaluates the whole British Russian research, the main advantages and existence of British Russian research. The defects are summarized and appropriate research conclusions are finally put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D751.2
本文編號：2184636
[Abstract]:After the end of the Cold War, British scholars have been working hard on the issue of Russian transformation. They have put forward their own remarkable views on many frontier academic issues, and have contributed to the international Slar. His high-level research has played an important role in helping the British government formulate foreign policy, and even had a subtle impact on the evolution of contemporary international patterns.
This topic mainly studies the research situation of the Russian and Soviet Union in the British academic circles after the Cold War, is an analysis, synthesis and evaluation of the basic research situation of the specific historical period and specific fields. In the past 20 years after the end of the Cold War, the British academia has made major research achievements in the fields of political transformation, economic transformation, history and diplomacy between Russia and the Soviet Union, and has analyzed the basic ideological tendency, theoretical viewpoints, research methods and analysis paths of the British and Russian research circles. Finally, a comprehensive cognition and comprehensive evaluation of the research situation of the United Kingdom and Russia after the cold war is concluded.
This paper is divided into seven chapters. Firstly, the history of British Russian studies is systematically reviewed. Then, the main achievements of British Russian studies after the cold war are analyzed in depth. Finally, the main characteristics and ideological pedigree of British Russian studies after the cold war are summarized.
The first chapter is the introduction part, which mainly describes the origin of the subject and the significance of the subject in academic history, theoretical research and diplomatic practice. The research framework of this paper is introduced.
The second chapter is the general situation of British Russian studies, including the historical evolution of British Russian studies and the basic situation of British Russian studies after the Cold War. This paper focuses on the analysis of the current situation, introduces in detail the main research institutions, mainstream scholars, and major academic journals in contemporary British academia, and analyzes the changes of research fields and topics in British academia after the Cold War through quantitative research.
The third chapter is the study of the political transformation of Russia in Britain after the cold war.On the basis of summarizing the overall research situation of the British scholars on the political transformation of Russia after the cold war,the author summarizes the views of the contemporary British scholars with the clue of the main research topics. The generation and other issues were highlighted, and different views emerged in the related issues were explained.
Chapter Four is the study of the economic transformation of Russia in Britain after the Cold War. According to the differences of the ideas of British scholars, this paper analyzes the two competing and opposing views of the British academia on the economic transformation of Russia in a comparative way. While the left-wing scholars insist on the perspective of new Marxism and regard equality, social interests and economic autonomy as the basic criteria for evaluating Russian economic transformation.
The fifth chapter is the study of Russian history in Britain after the Cold War.The study of history is an important tradition in British academia and the method of historiography is one of the basic methods in the study of Britain and Russia.British historians actively participate in the study of transformation and interpret the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the transformation of Russia from the perspective of historiography. This chapter introduces the content of historical research with the theory of Empire as the core.
Chapter Six is the study of Russian diplomacy in Britain after the Cold War. In the field of British-Russian studies, the representative viewpoints on Russian diplomacy are mostly related to think tanks. With the advantages of being familiar with foreign affairs and having abundant first-hand information, they have made very rich achievements in the field of Russian diplomacy. According to the contents of different topics, this chapter summarizes the research of British scholars on Russian diplomacy after the Cold War.
Chapter VII is the conclusion. After a comprehensive analysis of the political, economic, historical and diplomatic fields, this part summarizes the ideological pedigree and characteristics of the whole post-Cold War British Russian research field, and evaluates the whole British Russian research, the main advantages and existence of British Russian research. The defects are summarized and appropriate research conclusions are finally put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D751.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 大衛(wèi)·雷恩;朱貴昌;;后社會主義國家與世界經(jīng)濟(jì):全球經(jīng)濟(jì)危機(jī)的影響[J];當(dāng)代世界社會主義問題;2009年03期
2 徐葵;美國的蘇聯(lián)問題研究發(fā)展概況——訪美考察記之一[J];蘇聯(lián)東歐問題;1983年01期
3 R·薩克瓦;王鐵軍;;是“新冷戰(zhàn)”,還是“20年危機(jī)”?——俄羅斯和國際政治[J];俄羅斯研究;2008年05期
4 波波·羅;張紅;;俄羅斯與西方的關(guān)系——過去、現(xiàn)在及未來[J];俄羅斯研究;2009年04期
5 波波·羅;張紅;;西方俄羅斯研究方法論[J];俄羅斯研究;2010年03期
6 理查德·薩克瓦;張紅;;冷和平:解讀俄羅斯與西方的關(guān)系[J];俄羅斯研究;2010年06期
7 楊成;;中國俄蘇研究的范式重構(gòu)與智識革命——基于學(xué)術(shù)史回顧和比較研究的展望[J];俄羅斯研究;2011年01期
8 封帥;;觀念、體制與領(lǐng)袖——阿奇·布朗視野中的俄羅斯轉(zhuǎn)型[J];俄羅斯研究;2011年03期
9 波波·羅;張紅;;俄羅斯、中國及中亞的權(quán)力制衡:融合還是競爭?[J];俄羅斯研究;2009年06期
10 大衛(wèi)·雷恩;李玉萍;;作為一種政治現(xiàn)象的“顏色革命”[J];當(dāng)代世界社會主義問題;2011年03期
，本文編號：2184636
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/guojizhengzhilunwen/2184636.html
