本文選題：民主 + 歐洲聯(lián)盟�。� 參考：《中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院》2008年博士論文

【摘要】： “民主赤字”和“合法性不足”是20世紀(jì)90年代《馬斯特里赫特條約》生效后,歐盟逐漸凸顯出來的焦點問題。民主是否適用于歐盟這一超越國界的政治組織形式,歐盟受到哪些民主質(zhì)疑,有哪些解決民主問題的途徑,本論文將探討這三個問題。 由于民主和歐盟概念極端復(fù)雜,筆者并沒有輕易給出定論,而是針對歐盟具有的國際組織、準(zhǔn)聯(lián)邦國家式的超國家實體,以及治理體系三種屬性,分別加以考量,進(jìn)行了全面、綜合的剖析,避免呈現(xiàn)給讀者看似有力,實則片面的單維圖像。在考察中我們發(fā)現(xiàn),運用不同的民主標(biāo)準(zhǔn)考察歐盟不同側(cè)面的屬性,“歐盟是否有民主問題,它存在怎樣的民主問題”有不同的答案:作為一個國際組織,可以說歐盟不存在民主問題;作為一個準(zhǔn)聯(lián)邦式的超國家政體,同所謂的“成熟民主國家”比起來,它存在較多不足,但有些方面,相比其民主水平并不低;如果我們把歐盟看作一個治理體系,那么盡管它解決問題的能力賦予自己一定程度的民主合法性,但并不能掩蓋歐洲公民認(rèn)同意識薄弱和公民政治觀點傳導(dǎo)機(jī)制不完善的民主缺陷。 我們應(yīng)當(dāng)意識到,歐盟是一種全新的政治形式,它不是一個國家,所以國家情境中產(chǎn)生的民主模式不能簡單移植到歐盟身上,另一方面,它又脫胎于民族國家的聯(lián)合,所以其民主的發(fā)展又不可能完全脫離民族國家的經(jīng)驗。在歐盟政治的實際發(fā)展過程中,我們可以發(fā)現(xiàn)其中既有西方民主國家傳統(tǒng)的代議制民主制度,也有西方民主理論界較新提倡的參與式和協(xié)商式民主。由于歐盟的不定性,它現(xiàn)在還沒有形成一套成型的民主制度(類似西方民主國家的民主制度),能為自己成功辯護(hù),歐盟仍在探索平衡的民主新形式的道路上前行。
[Abstract]:After the Maastricht Treaty came into force in the 1990s, "democratic deficit" and "lack of legitimacy" became the focus of the EU. Whether democracy is applicable to the EU, which is a form of political organization that transcends national boundaries, what kind of democracy the EU is questioned about and how to solve the democratic problems, this paper will explore these three problems. Because of the extremely complex concept of democracy and the European Union, the author did not easily give a final conclusion. Instead, he considered the three attributes of the European Union, namely, international organizations, quasi-federal supranational entities, and governance systems. Comprehensive analysis to avoid presenting to the reader appears to be powerful, in fact, one-dimensional image. During the inspection, we found that applying different democratic standards to examine the attributes of different aspects of the EU, "does the EU have a democratic problem and what kind of democratic problem does it have" has different answers: as an international organization, It can be said that there is no democratic problem in the European Union, as a quasi-federal supranational government, it has more shortcomings than the so-called "mature democracy", but in some aspects, it is not lower than its democratic level. If we think of the EU as a system of governance, then even though its ability to solve problems gives itself a degree of democratic legitimacy, However, it can not conceal the democratic defects of European citizens' weak identity consciousness and imperfect transmission mechanism of citizens' political views. We should realize that the EU is a completely new political form, it is not a country, so the democratic model that emerges from the national context cannot be simply transplanted to the EU. On the other hand, it is born out of the union of nation-states. Therefore, its democratic development can not be completely divorced from the experience of nation-state. In the course of the political development of EU, we can find that there are both the traditional representative democracy in the western democracy countries and the participatory and consultative democracy advocated by the western democratic theorists. Because of the EU's uncertainty, it has yet to form a formalised democracy (similar to that of Western democracies that defends its success, and the EU is still on its way to exploring new forms of balanced democracy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號】：D75

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳麗明;民族聯(lián)合途徑研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：1887581