本文選題：轉(zhuǎn)型起點(diǎn) + 轉(zhuǎn)型順序　； 參考：《北京社會(huì)科學(xué)》2014年07期

【摘要】：本文的比較重點(diǎn)在三個(gè)方面:⑴在轉(zhuǎn)型的起點(diǎn)上,中國先改農(nóng)業(yè)才得以借鑒歷史經(jīng)驗(yàn)獲得成功并緩解了政改壓力,而俄羅斯在推進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)改革遭到利益集團(tuán)抵制以后不得不先改政治體制;⑵在轉(zhuǎn)型過程中,中國先改價(jià)格、后改產(chǎn)權(quán)做對(duì)了"順序",而俄羅斯的"休克療法"實(shí)際上使私有化運(yùn)動(dòng)優(yōu)先,導(dǎo)致了嚴(yán)重的轉(zhuǎn)型衰退;⑶利益集團(tuán)曾經(jīng)是俄國、現(xiàn)在是中國深化改革的主要障礙。
[Abstract]:The comparative focus of this paper is on three aspects: 1. In the starting point of the transformation, China can use the historical experience for reference to obtain success and alleviate the pressure of political reform.After Russia's economic reform was boycotted by interest groups, it had to first change its political system. In the process of transformation, China first changed prices.Russia's shock therapy has actually given priority to the privatisation movement, leading to a severe transformational recession. Interest groups, once Russia's, are now the main obstacles to deepening China's reforms.
【作者單位】： 上海社會(huì)科學(xué)院經(jīng)濟(jì)研究所;
【分類號(hào)】：D61;D751.2
，

本文編號(hào)：1771009