本文選題：社會轉(zhuǎn)型　切入點：政治合法性　出處：《上海外國語大學(xué)》2014年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：“合法性”已經(jīng)成為當(dāng)代政治學(xué)和社會學(xué)的一個核心概念,它是決定政治權(quán)力體系存在、持續(xù)、穩(wěn)定與發(fā)展的基礎(chǔ)和前提,是任何政治權(quán)力都必須面對,又必須認(rèn)真解決的問題。2011年春天中東地區(qū)發(fā)生嚴(yán)重動蕩,導(dǎo)致了幾個政權(quán)垮臺,埃及等共和制阿拉伯國家在這次革命浪潮中之所以群體性陷入動亂,根本原因是這些國家政權(quán)喪失了政治合法性。 對埃及巨變的解釋,不可局限于三年多來發(fā)生的政治動蕩。置于更長的歷史中考察,才能夠梳理出埃及二百多年來社會轉(zhuǎn)型過程中,政治合法性自身運行、變化的規(guī)律以及對不同政體下政治權(quán)力運行的作用和影響。 本文除導(dǎo)論和結(jié)論部分外,共分為五章,分析結(jié)構(gòu)及其框架安排如下 導(dǎo)論部分主要是對論文的研究背景、國內(nèi)外相關(guān)研究概況、理論基礎(chǔ)、研究方法、寫作思路和創(chuàng)新點的介紹。 第一章“社會轉(zhuǎn)型與政治合法性問題”,在梳理社會轉(zhuǎn)型、合法性概念的起源與演變的基礎(chǔ)上,介紹和評析學(xué)界有關(guān)社會轉(zhuǎn)型和政治合法性問題的不同觀點,闡述本文對社會轉(zhuǎn)型和政治合法性問題的基本認(rèn)識,為以下幾章的論述打下理論基礎(chǔ)和分析框架。 以下“王朝自強”、“自由憲政”、“共和新政”和“后穆巴拉克時代的埃及”等四章,分別具體探討了埃及在探索社會轉(zhuǎn)型的不同階段和歷史時期的所面臨的政治合法性問題。 以上四章作為論文主體部分,在章節(jié)安排上體現(xiàn)了內(nèi)在的邏輯聯(lián)系。四章分別從不同歷史階段和時期考察了埃及近代以來,在探索民族解放、民族復(fù)興道路,即實現(xiàn)社會轉(zhuǎn)型道路這一根本任務(wù)方面所作的努力。合法性說到底是一個認(rèn)同進而服從的問題。本文的目的就是探討近代以來埃及人民對埃及政府探索轉(zhuǎn)型道路的認(rèn)同問題。前一階段在政治方面,特別是在爭取民族獨立和打破權(quán)力壟斷方面的軟弱和在推動經(jīng)濟社會進步方面的保守,導(dǎo)致這一時代末期的深刻危機,進而促使埃及選擇嶄新的發(fā)展道路。 “關(guān)于埃及社會轉(zhuǎn)型期政治合法性問題的若干思考”,是論文結(jié)論部分。本章在總結(jié)、概括上述各章分析和論證的基礎(chǔ)上,認(rèn)為埃及從傳統(tǒng)社會向現(xiàn)代社會轉(zhuǎn)變的過渡過程,即社會現(xiàn)代化的過程,是一個涉及到諸多方而的系統(tǒng)工程,任務(wù)繁多,矛盾錯綜復(fù)雜,其間的挫折是不可避免的。本章分析了影響埃及國家政治民主化進程的因索,總結(jié)埃及了等中東伊斯蘭國家政治民主化實踐的特征和類型,論述在社會轉(zhuǎn)型期如何處理發(fā)展、改革(主要指政治民主化)與穩(wěn)定的關(guān)系,最后是對中東伊斯蘭國家民主化前景的展望。
[Abstract]:"legitimacy" has become a core concept in contemporary politics and sociology. It is the basis and prerequisite for determining the existence, continuity, stability and development of the political power system. In the spring of 2011, serious unrest in the Middle East led to the collapse of several political regimes, and Egypt and other Republican Arab countries fell into turmoil in the midst of this revolutionary wave. The root cause is that these regimes have lost political legitimacy. The explanation of the great changes in Egypt cannot be limited to the political turmoil that has occurred in the past three years or so. It is only through a longer history that the political legitimacy itself can be sorted out in the course of Egypt's social transformation over the past 200 years. The law of change and its influence on the operation of political power under different polity. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into five chapters. The structure and framework of the analysis are as follows. The introduction part mainly introduces the research background, the domestic and foreign related research survey, the theory foundation, the research method, the writing thought and the innovation point. The first chapter "Social transformation and political legitimacy", on the basis of combing the origin and evolution of the concept of social transformation and legitimacy, introduces and comments on the different viewpoints of academic circles on social transformation and political legitimacy. This paper expounds the basic understanding of social transformation and political legitimacy, and lays a theoretical foundation and an analytical framework for the following chapters. The following four chapters, "Dynasty self-strengthening", "Free constitutionalism", "New Republican deal" and "Egypt in the post-Mubarak era", respectively discuss the political legitimacy of Egypt in exploring different stages and historical periods of social transformation. The above four chapters, as the main body of the thesis, reflect the internal logical connection in the chapter arrangement. The four chapters examine the modern Egyptian national liberation and national rejuvenation road from different historical stages and periods, respectively. In the end, legitimacy is an issue of identity and obedience. The purpose of this paper is to explore the transition path of the Egyptian people to the Egyptian government since modern times. The political aspect of the previous phase, Especially the weakness in fighting for national independence and breaking the monopoly of power and the conservatism in promoting economic and social progress led to a deep crisis in the end of this era and prompted Egypt to choose a new way of development. "some reflections on the political legitimacy in the transition period of Egyptian society" is the conclusion of the paper. This chapter, on the basis of summing up the analysis and argumentation of the above chapters, holds that the transition process of Egypt from the traditional society to the modern society, That is, the process of social modernization is a systematic project involving many parties, with numerous tasks, complicated contradictions and inevitable setbacks. Summarizing the characteristics and types of political democratization practices in the Islamic countries of the Middle East, such as Egypt, and discussing how to deal with the relationship between development, reform (mainly political democratization) and stability in the period of social transformation, Finally, the prospect of the democratization of the Islamic countries in the Middle East.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海外國語大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D741.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 安惠侯;;中國與埃及友好關(guān)系六十年[J];阿拉伯世界研究;2010年03期

2 邴正,鐘賢巍;當(dāng)代社會發(fā)展趨勢與中國社會的結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)型[J];北方論叢;2004年05期

3 馬寶成;試論政治權(quán)力合法性的意識形態(tài)基礎(chǔ)[J];東方論壇(青島大學(xué)學(xué)報);2000年02期

4 張星久;論合法性研究的依據(jù)、學(xué)術(shù)價值及其存在的問題[J];法學(xué)評論;2000年03期

5 馮鵬志;論知識經(jīng)濟背景中社會結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)型的新趨向[J];桂海論叢;2003年01期

6 周烈;;阿拉伯世界的民主進程[J];國際論壇;2006年01期

7 楊森;中國社會轉(zhuǎn)型的特殊性分析[J];甘肅社會科學(xué);2003年01期

8 包剛升;;民主崩潰的政治學(xué)——選民分裂、政治制度與民主崩潰[J];公共行政評論;2013年05期

9 錢乘旦;宗教對抗國家——埃及現(xiàn)代化的難題[J];世界歷史;2000年03期

10 哈全安;納賽爾主義與埃及的現(xiàn)代化[J];世界歷史;2002年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李艷枝;土耳其伊斯蘭復(fù)興運動研究[D];南開大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：1624521