本文選題：國家　切入點：同盟　出處：《東北亞論壇》2017年01期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：一般認(rèn)為,區(qū)域化會帶來安全改善。然而,筆者認(rèn)為區(qū)域化的模范生歐洲與區(qū)域化的新星東亞令人憂慮的現(xiàn)實表明,區(qū)域化也與區(qū)域安全惡化相伴,據(jù)此提出一個新的理論命題——區(qū)域化與安全化悖論。區(qū)域化與安全化悖論的產(chǎn)生存在普遍性原因。以東北亞解析區(qū)域化與安全化悖論表明,對區(qū)域化中主要國家的不同認(rèn)知,國家以經(jīng)貿(mào)政策界定和期盼安全政策的發(fā)展和方向,以及區(qū)域內(nèi)同盟在區(qū)域化的背景下日益內(nèi)向化、一體化,均扮演了重要作用,即區(qū)域化與安全化悖論既是環(huán)境壓力的結(jié)果,更是國家政策主動選擇的結(jié)果。
[Abstract]:It is generally believed that regionalization will bring about security improvements. However, the author thinks that the worrying reality of Europe, the model student of regionalization, and the new star of regionalization in East Asia shows that regionalization is also accompanied by the deterioration of regional security. On the basis of this, a new theoretical proposition, regionalization and securitization paradox, is put forward. There are universal reasons for regionalization and securitization paradox. The analysis of regionalization and securitization paradox in Northeast Asia shows that there are different understandings of major countries in regionalization. The definition of national economic and trade policy and the expectation of the development and direction of security policy, as well as the increasingly introverted and integrated regional alliance in the context of regionalization, all play an important role, that is, regionalization and security paradox are the result of environmental pressure. It is also the result of active choice of national policy.
【作者單位】： 吉林大學(xué)東北亞研究院;
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金一般項目(16BGJ044) 吉林大學(xué)項目(2015LZY029)
【分類號】：D731

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 李東屹;;從區(qū)域治理視角看東盟在東亞區(qū)域化中的地位[J];國際關(guān)系學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年04期

，

本文編號：1582797