本文關(guān)鍵詞：關(guān)于泰國(guó)司法化的諸種不同觀念　出處：《東南亞研究》2015年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 泰國(guó) 他信 公正 司法化 君主制

【摘要】：本文主要研究2006—2014年間泰國(guó)司法化的政治問(wèn)題,并審視此極端爭(zhēng)議期間司法被卷入政治的諸種形式。本文從2006年國(guó)王的兩次重要演講以及知名學(xué)者、社會(huì)批評(píng)家提拉育·汶密的詮釋切入,細(xì)究幾項(xiàng)具有持久政治影響的關(guān)鍵司法判決,包括2006年的大選無(wú)效案、2007年的取締泰愛泰黨案、2008年和2014年的親他信·西那瓦的沙馬·順達(dá)衛(wèi)和英拉·西那瓦兩位總理被免案、2008年他信受到數(shù)項(xiàng)腐敗指控并被判罪名成立,以及2010年的司法扣押他信資產(chǎn)案等。本文提出以下幾個(gè)問(wèn)題:司法化必定意味著保守主義者千方百計(jì)要?jiǎng)儕Z從政者的權(quán)力并破壞選舉政治嗎?法官們是為泰國(guó)社會(huì)工作還是同某些既得利益集團(tuán)結(jié)盟?在泰國(guó)語(yǔ)境下,司法能動(dòng)性越強(qiáng),是否就越能推進(jìn)社會(huì)與政治領(lǐng)域的進(jìn)步?本文認(rèn)為,泰國(guó)的"司法化"是一個(gè)復(fù)雜的社會(huì)現(xiàn)象,對(duì)不同的法庭在不同的情況下以及不同的時(shí)間做出的判決,都必須仔細(xì)斟酌,辨明其各自所起的作用。
[Abstract]:This paper focuses on the political issues of judicial transition in Thailand from 2006 to 2014. This paper explores the various forms in which the judiciary was involved in politics during this extreme dispute. This paper begins with the two important speeches of the King in 2006 and the interpretation of the well-known scholar and social critic Tilayu Wenmi. Take a closer look at several key judicial decisions with lasting political impact, including the nullification of the general election on 2006 and the outlawing of the Thai party in 2007. In 2008 and 2014, pro-Thaksin Shinawatra's Samar Shunda and Yingluck Shinawatra were removed from the case, and Thaksin was convicted on several corruption charges on 2008. The judicial seizure of Thaksin's assets in 2010 and so on. This article raises the following questions: does justice necessarily mean that conservatives try to deprive politicians of their power and undermine electoral politics? Do judges work for Thai society or are they allied with certain vested interests? In the context of Thailand, the stronger the judicial initiative, the more social and political progress can be promoted? This paper holds that the "judicature" in Thailand is a complicated social phenomenon, and the judgments made by different courts under different circumstances and at different times must be carefully considered and their respective roles identified.
【作者單位】： 利茲大學(xué);成都學(xué)院(成都大學(xué))四川省泰國(guó)研究中心;成都學(xué)院(成都大學(xué))外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院;
【基金】：四川省哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)研究“十二五”規(guī)劃2013年度課題“國(guó)外智庫(kù)2000—2013泰國(guó)研究譯介”(SC13WY25)
【分類號(hào)】：D733.6
【正文快照】： *原作信息:Contemporary Southeast Asia,Vol.36,No.3,2014(Singapore:Institute of Southeast Asian Studies).Translated with the kindpermission of the publisher.該文原載于新加坡東南亞研究所出版的《當(dāng)代東南亞》(英文)2014年第3期,并經(jīng)該機(jī)構(gòu)授權(quán)翻譯發(fā)表。原作者向

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 夏立安;;拉丁美洲政治司法化現(xiàn)象剖析(草稿)[A];中國(guó)拉丁美洲史研究會(huì)第七屆會(huì)員代表大會(huì)暨“拉丁美洲現(xiàn)代化進(jìn)程研究學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)”論文匯編[C];2007年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 [美]弗朗西斯·福山 孫西輝 編譯;美國(guó)政府因何陷入運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)僵局[N];社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1406195