【摘要】：司法鑒定制度是司法制度的重要組成部分，是其他司法活動(dòng)的保障制度，對(duì)于減少冤假錯(cuò)案的發(fā)生，深化人權(quán)理念等均有現(xiàn)實(shí)意義，是順應(yīng)法治精神的重要表現(xiàn)。因此，如何完善我國(guó)刑事司法鑒定制度，合理設(shè)置鑒定制度的內(nèi)部機(jī)制，使司法鑒定程序與其他訴訟程序有機(jī)結(jié)合，更好地體現(xiàn)刑事訴訟的實(shí)體公正和程序正義，進(jìn)而維護(hù)當(dāng)事人的訴訟權(quán)利，是值得深思和研究的問(wèn)題。目前，由于鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)設(shè)置混亂，尤其是偵查部門內(nèi)設(shè)鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)設(shè)置、管理無(wú)序，再加上缺乏統(tǒng)一的鑒定技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，導(dǎo)致多頭鑒定、重復(fù)鑒定、鑒定分歧等現(xiàn)象屢見(jiàn)不鮮，這不僅使個(gè)案得不到及時(shí)、公正的審判，，引發(fā)社會(huì)群體性事件，更會(huì)影響整個(gè)司法體系的權(quán)威性。通過(guò)對(duì)當(dāng)前司法鑒定制度相關(guān)法律法規(guī)的整理、分析，發(fā)現(xiàn)我國(guó)刑事司法鑒定制度在鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)、鑒定人、啟動(dòng)程序、質(zhì)證、認(rèn)證等多方面均存在問(wèn)題。基于鑒定制度的立法漏洞與實(shí)踐困難，本文從司法鑒定制度的組織性、操作性、證據(jù)性角度出發(fā)，提出一系列刑事司法鑒定制度的完善措施，重點(diǎn)論述了鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)的設(shè)置模式、鑒定人的資質(zhì)要求、鑒定人出庭作證的具體情形和保障以及鑒定意見(jiàn)的采信規(guī)則。
[Abstract]:The judicial expertise system is an important part of the judicial system and the guarantee system of other judicial activities. It is of practical significance to reduce the occurrence of unjust and false cases and deepen the concept of human rights. It is also an important manifestation of complying with the spirit of the rule of law. Therefore, how to perfect the criminal judicial appraisal system in our country, set up the internal mechanism of the appraisal system reasonably, combine the judicial appraisal procedure with other proceedings organically, better embody the substantive justice and procedural justice of the criminal procedure, and then safeguard the litigant's litigation right, is worth pondering and studying deeply. At present, due to the confusion of the establishment of appraisal institutions, especially the establishment of appraisal institutions in the investigation department, the disorder of management, and the lack of unified identification technical standards, it is not uncommon for the phenomenon of long identification, repeated identification, identification differences and so on, which not only makes the case not get a timely and fair trial, leads to social mass events, but also affects the authority of the whole judicial system. Through the collation and analysis of the relevant laws and regulations of the current judicial identification system, it is found that there are many problems in the criminal judicial identification system of our country in many aspects, such as identification institutions, experts, initiation procedures, cross-examination, certification and so on. Based on the legislative loopholes and practical difficulties of the appraisal system, this paper puts forward a series of measures to perfect the criminal judicial appraisal system from the point of view of the organization, operation and evidence of the judicial identification system, focusing on the setting mode of the appraisal institution, the qualification requirements of the expert, the concrete situation and guarantee of the expert testifying in court, and the acceptance rules of the appraisal opinion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D918.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周士敏;大陸與澳門刑事訴訟制度若干基本問(wèn)題之比較[J];比較法研究;1998年03期

2 郭金霞,文靜;貫徹實(shí)施《關(guān)于司法鑒定管理問(wèn)題的決定》專家座談會(huì)綜述[J];中國(guó)司法;2005年07期

3 鄒明理;對(duì)《關(guān)于司法鑒定管理問(wèn)題的決定》中幾個(gè)有爭(zhēng)議問(wèn)題的思考[J];中國(guó)司法;2005年08期

4 孫業(yè)群;;當(dāng)前司法鑒定體制改革工作中存在的突出問(wèn)題及對(duì)策[J];中國(guó)司法;2006年10期

5 楊靜;劉艷徠;;芻議司法鑒定統(tǒng)一管理的地方探索與實(shí)踐[J];中國(guó)司法;2010年01期

6 霍憲丹;郭華;;司法鑒定制度改革的邏輯反思與路徑探究[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2010年01期

7 郭華;爭(zhēng)議鑒定結(jié)論的選擇適用規(guī)則研究[J];法律適用;2005年03期

8 郭華;;偵查機(jī)關(guān)內(nèi)設(shè)鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)鑒定問(wèn)題的透視與分析——13起錯(cuò)案涉及鑒定問(wèn)題的展開[J];證據(jù)科學(xué);2008年04期

9 盧建軍;;司法鑒定結(jié)論使用中存在問(wèn)題及解決途徑——兼論我國(guó)訴訟專家輔助人制度的建構(gòu)和完善[J];證據(jù)科學(xué);2010年06期

10 霍憲丹;鑒定權(quán)是公民訴權(quán)的一項(xiàng)重要內(nèi)容——兼析中國(guó)司法鑒定制度的現(xiàn)狀與發(fā)展方向[J];中國(guó)法醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2004年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 黃珞;論我國(guó)刑事質(zhì)證制度的不足與完善[D];上海交通大學(xué);2007年

本文編號(hào)：2503351