【摘要】： 勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度自1957年創(chuàng)立至今,通過(guò)五十余年的探索和實(shí)踐,已經(jīng)形成了公安機(jī)關(guān)辦案呈報(bào)、勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)委員會(huì)審查決定、勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)機(jī)關(guān)負(fù)責(zé)執(zhí)行,人民檢察院實(shí)行監(jiān)督的獨(dú)具特色的程序模式。 執(zhí)行程序是勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度的最后一道程序。五十多年來(lái),勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度在預(yù)防犯罪、維護(hù)治安、穩(wěn)定社會(huì)方面發(fā)揮了重要的作用。這些作用,都是通過(guò)執(zhí)行程序得以實(shí)現(xiàn)的。 盡管如此,勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)執(zhí)行程序卻在收容、變更、解教等環(huán)節(jié)以及管理、教育、生產(chǎn)等手段的運(yùn)用過(guò)程中,仍存在諸多弊端,這些弊端形成的原因是多方面的,不僅有制度設(shè)計(jì)上的,有實(shí)踐操作中違規(guī)的,還有文化層面的。 為此,理論界和司法實(shí)踐部門(mén)都在進(jìn)行有益的反思。本文認(rèn)為,勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)執(zhí)行程序的改革勢(shì)在必行,首先在立法理念上,需要從國(guó)家優(yōu)位主義向人權(quán)保護(hù)主義轉(zhuǎn)變,堅(jiān)持法治理念、以人為本的理念變革;其次在方法革新方面,應(yīng)打破原來(lái)類(lèi)似監(jiān)獄的,高度封閉、強(qiáng)制勞動(dòng)、單邊教育的習(xí)慣程式,代之以向社會(huì)開(kāi)放、向勞教人員家庭延伸、向勞教人員個(gè)人滲透的多樣化的管理模式并引入科學(xué)的矯治方法;還要在制度的設(shè)計(jì)、體系的統(tǒng)一、內(nèi)容的規(guī)范、監(jiān)督和救濟(jì)機(jī)制健全等方面進(jìn)行立法完善,以更好地發(fā)揮勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度的作用,實(shí)現(xiàn)勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度的宗旨。 全文分四章進(jìn)行論述:第一章主要從內(nèi)涵和外延上界定勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)執(zhí)行程序的概念;第二章論述勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)執(zhí)行程序的立法現(xiàn)狀、實(shí)踐現(xiàn)狀、現(xiàn)行勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)執(zhí)行程序存在的弊端及原因分析;第三章從程序正義和實(shí)體正義的實(shí)現(xiàn)、保障勞教人員的人權(quán)、社會(huì)穩(wěn)定和法律秩序的建立、消除國(guó)際不良影響等四個(gè)角度闡述勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)執(zhí)行程序改革的價(jià)值;第四章提出勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)執(zhí)行程序理念變革、方法革新、立法完善等三大改革對(duì)策。
[Abstract]:Since its inception in 1957, through more than 50 years of exploration and practice, the system of reeducation through labour has formed a public security organ to report cases, examine and decide by the reeducation through labour committee, and the reeducation through labour organ is responsible for its implementation. The people's procuratorate carries out the unique procedure mode of supervision. The execution procedure is the last procedure of the system of reeducation through labour. For more than 50 years, the reeducation-through-labour system has played an important role in crime prevention, public security and social stability. These functions are achieved through the execution of procedures. In spite of this, there are still many drawbacks in the implementation of the procedure of re-education through labour in the process of admission, change, interpretation of education and the use of management, education, production and other means. The reasons for these malpractices are various. There are not only institutional design, practice in violation of the operation, but also the cultural level. For this reason, the theory circle and the judicial practice department are all carrying on the beneficial reflection. This paper argues that the reform of the implementation procedure of re-education through labour is imperative. Firstly, it is necessary to change from national superiority to human rights protectionism, adhere to the concept of rule of law, and change the concept of people-oriented. Secondly, with regard to the reform of methods, we should break the customary pattern of highly closed, compulsory labour and unilateral education similar to prisons, and replace them with opening up to society and extending to families of reeducation through labour. (a) infiltrating diversified management models into individual reeducation through labour personnel and introducing scientific corrective methods; It is necessary to perfect the legislation in the aspects of system design, system unification, content standardization, supervision and relief mechanism, so as to give full play to the function of reeducation-through-labor system and realize the purpose of reeducation-through-labor system. The thesis is divided into four chapters: the first chapter defines the concept of reeducation-through-labor execution procedure from the connotation and extension. The second chapter discusses the legislative status quo of the enforcement procedure of re-education through labor, the practice status quo, the malpractice of the present procedure of re-education through labor and the analysis of the reasons. The third chapter expounds the value of the reform of the procedure of reeducation through labor from four angles: the realization of procedural justice and substantive justice, the protection of the human rights of reeducation through labour personnel, the establishment of social stability and the establishment of legal order, and the elimination of the negative international influence. The fourth chapter puts forward three reform countermeasures, such as the reform of the concept of the procedure of reeducation through labor, the innovation of the method and the perfection of the legislation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D926.8

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王寨華;論我國(guó)勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度的現(xiàn)狀及發(fā)展[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2001年01期

2 劉恒志;勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)立法的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2001年12期

3 王金泉;;試論勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)改革中的價(jià)值重建[J];中國(guó)司法;2007年03期

4 魯嘉微;;邵名正教授談《違法行為矯治法》[J];中國(guó)司法;2007年05期

5 陳進(jìn);;建立新型教育矯治體系之探討[J];中國(guó)司法;2007年05期

6 劉治安;;關(guān)于我國(guó)勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)工作發(fā)展趨勢(shì)的思考與展望[J];中國(guó)司法;2007年10期

7 皮純協(xié),王毅;試論勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度的改革與完善[J];法學(xué)雜志;2000年03期

8 劉仲發(fā);檢察機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)的法律監(jiān)督[J];法學(xué)雜志;2002年03期

9 劉玉蘭,楊淑鴻;對(duì)我國(guó)勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度的法理分析[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

10 趙文艷;論勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)的現(xiàn)狀及其立法走向[J];河北法學(xué);2002年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：2440411