【摘要】：本研究屬于法學(xué)和語(yǔ)言學(xué)交叉領(lǐng)域法律語(yǔ)言學(xué)的一個(gè)分支,是警察執(zhí)法口語(yǔ)語(yǔ)言的動(dòng)態(tài)、過(guò)程研究。本研究對(duì)警察訊問(wèn)話(huà)語(yǔ)中權(quán)力關(guān)系進(jìn)行了批評(píng)分析,目的是為展現(xiàn)警察訊問(wèn)話(huà)語(yǔ)中的權(quán)力不對(duì)稱(chēng)現(xiàn)象,并提出若想達(dá)到警察訊問(wèn)的機(jī)構(gòu)目的,即在保障人權(quán)的基礎(chǔ)上有效獲得犯罪嫌疑人真實(shí)自愿地供述,警察就需要調(diào)整訊問(wèn)話(huà)語(yǔ)中的不平衡權(quán)力關(guān)系,向著互動(dòng)雙方參與的“會(huì)話(huà)”方向轉(zhuǎn)變,實(shí)現(xiàn)由“訊問(wèn)(Interrogation)”向“詢(xún)問(wèn)(Interview)”的轉(zhuǎn)變。 第一章導(dǎo)論綜述法律語(yǔ)言學(xué)、警察訊問(wèn)話(huà)語(yǔ)等相關(guān)研究,簡(jiǎn)要介紹了本研究的目的、內(nèi)容和意義。 第二章是有關(guān)語(yǔ)言理論和研究方法的介紹。本章對(duì)權(quán)力的概念進(jìn)行了解析,提出了適合本研究的權(quán)力操作概念,構(gòu)建了以權(quán)力分析為問(wèn)題中心的,綜合批評(píng)話(huà)語(yǔ)分析工具的研究框架。本研究的研究方法和語(yǔ)料情況也在本章做了說(shuō)明。 第三章分析警察訊問(wèn)話(huà)語(yǔ)的機(jī)構(gòu)特征。本章著重考察了機(jī)構(gòu)話(huà)語(yǔ)研究的歷史和概念,歸納了警察訊問(wèn)話(huà)語(yǔ)的機(jī)構(gòu)話(huà)語(yǔ)特征,分析了機(jī)構(gòu)話(huà)語(yǔ)語(yǔ)境下的權(quán)力關(guān)系問(wèn)題。 第四、五、六章運(yùn)用會(huì)話(huà)分析方法對(duì)警察訊問(wèn)話(huà)語(yǔ)的形式進(jìn)行了描述。第四章主要對(duì)警察訊問(wèn)話(huà)語(yǔ)進(jìn)行了結(jié)構(gòu)分析。借助參與角色理論,提出了警察訊問(wèn)話(huà)語(yǔ)的理想?yún)⑴c框架。 第五章基于語(yǔ)料數(shù)據(jù)專(zhuān)門(mén)分析了警察訊問(wèn)中的問(wèn)話(huà)行為,展現(xiàn)了我國(guó)警察訊問(wèn)的現(xiàn)狀以及訊問(wèn)中警察是如何利用問(wèn)話(huà)來(lái)行使權(quán)力的。 第六章對(duì)警察所掌握的語(yǔ)言互動(dòng)控制資源進(jìn)行分析,進(jìn)一步揭示訊問(wèn)中的警察是如何使用這些語(yǔ)言形式控制和支配犯罪嫌疑人,實(shí)現(xiàn)自己交際目的的。 第七章考察警察訊問(wèn)話(huà)語(yǔ)中的警察故事版本與犯罪嫌疑人故事版本的協(xié)商和斗爭(zhēng)。通過(guò)展示在此過(guò)程中警察訊問(wèn)者所采取的種種話(huà)語(yǔ)控制手段來(lái)說(shuō)明警察訊問(wèn)者在犯罪事實(shí)構(gòu)建過(guò)程中表現(xiàn)出的強(qiáng)勢(shì)話(huà)語(yǔ)權(quán)力。 第八章則對(duì)犯罪嫌疑人的答話(huà)行為進(jìn)行了分析。在最低程度上遵守合作原則的基礎(chǔ)上,犯罪嫌疑人會(huì)采用某些抵制策略來(lái)防御警察訊問(wèn)者控制性問(wèn)話(huà)。但這種權(quán)力抵制大都是被動(dòng)的、防御性的,不能改變犯罪嫌疑人的弱勢(shì)地位。 第九章總結(jié)全文,指出警察訊問(wèn)話(huà)語(yǔ)中權(quán)力不對(duì)稱(chēng)會(huì)影響到機(jī)構(gòu)目的的實(shí)現(xiàn),由此提出“會(huì)話(huà)式”警察訊問(wèn)模式。筆者還闡述了本研究對(duì)警察訊問(wèn)實(shí)踐的啟示,指出了警察訊問(wèn)語(yǔ)言使用中的不規(guī)范之處并研擬了中國(guó)警察訊問(wèn)語(yǔ)言規(guī)范建議稿。最后指出了本研究的特色、局限和今后努力方向。
[Abstract]:This research is a branch of forensic linguistics in the intersection of law and linguistics, which is the dynamic and process study of the spoken language of police law enforcement. The purpose of this study is to show the asymmetry of power in police interrogation discourse and to achieve the institutional purpose of police interrogation. That is to say, on the basis of the protection of human rights, the police need to adjust the unbalanced power relationship in interrogation discourse and change to the direction of "conversation" in which the interactive two sides participate in effectively obtaining the true and voluntary confession of the criminal suspect. The transformation from "interrogating (Interrogation)" to "questioning (Interview)" is realized. The first chapter is an introduction to forensic linguistics, police interrogation discourse and other relevant studies, briefly introduced the purpose, content and significance of this study. The second chapter is about the language theory and the research method. This chapter analyzes the concept of power, puts forward the concept of power operation suitable for this study, and constructs a comprehensive framework of critical discourse analysis tools with power analysis as the focus. The research methods and corpus of this study are also explained in this chapter. The third chapter analyzes the institutional characteristics of police interrogation discourse. This chapter focuses on the history and concept of institutional discourse studies, summarizes the institutional discourse characteristics of police interrogation discourse, and analyzes the power relationship in the context of institutional discourse. The fourth, fifth and sixth chapters describe the form of police interrogation discourse by conversational analysis. The fourth chapter mainly analyzes the structure of police interrogation discourse. With the help of the theory of participative role, the ideal framework of police interrogation discourse is put forward. The fifth chapter analyzes the questioning behavior in police interrogation based on the data of corpus, and shows the current situation of police interrogation in China and how police use interrogations to exercise their power. The sixth chapter analyzes the language interactive control resources held by the police and further reveals how the police use these language forms to control and dominate the criminal suspects to achieve their communicative purposes. Chapter seven examines the negotiation and struggle between the police story version and the suspect story version in the police interrogation discourse. By demonstrating the various discourse control measures adopted by the police interrogators in this process, this paper illustrates the powerful discourse power shown by the police interrogators in the process of constructing the criminal facts. The eighth chapter analyzes the behavior of criminal suspects. On the basis of following the principle of cooperation to the minimum degree, the suspect will adopt some resistance tactics to defend the police interrogator from controlling questioning. However, this kind of power resistance is mostly passive, defensive and cannot change the weak position of the suspect. Chapter nine summarizes the full text and points out that the asymmetry of power in the police interrogation discourse will affect the realization of the purpose of the organization, and thus puts forward the "conversational" police interrogation mode. The author also expounds the enlightenment of this study to the practice of police interrogation, points out the irregularities in the use of police interrogation language, and draws up the suggestions on the language norms of police interrogation in China. Finally, the characteristics, limitations and future direction of this study are pointed out.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D918.5;D925.2

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 畢惜茜;陳小明;;偵查人員訊問(wèn)語(yǔ)言研究[J];中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2414281