論我國(guó)秘密偵查的法律規(guī)制
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2019-01-09 17:21
【摘要】:當(dāng)今世界各國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)飛速發(fā)展,科學(xué)技術(shù)也在不斷地進(jìn)步,并且隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)、科技、文化的交流與發(fā)展,各國(guó)的犯罪也呈現(xiàn)出新的特點(diǎn),現(xiàn)代的犯罪呈現(xiàn)出了更具有組織性、更多的利用高新科學(xué)技術(shù)以及更具有隱秘性的特征。這些變化對(duì)偵破犯罪的方式提出了新的挑戰(zhàn):以往各國(guó)大多以公開偵查為主,而如今只依靠公開偵查已經(jīng)不能及時(shí)有效的偵破現(xiàn)代新型案件,而且在面對(duì)具有新特點(diǎn)的犯罪時(shí)公開偵查可能會(huì)浪費(fèi)更多的資源,但卻得不到理想效果。為此,世界各國(guó)開始運(yùn)用秘密的偵查方式來(lái)獲取犯罪證據(jù)、打擊犯罪,并且取得了很好的效果,我國(guó)也不例外,在偵破案件的過程中也采取了不同的秘密偵查手段。秘密偵查具有很大的隱秘性以及不同程度的侵權(quán)性,但是我國(guó)目前還沒有從立法上對(duì)秘密偵查手段的適用主體、適用范圍以及其他注意事項(xiàng),進(jìn)行嚴(yán)格的法律規(guī)定。這就導(dǎo)致了實(shí)踐中秘密偵查手段使用的隨意性;秘密偵查沒有法律上的約束,造成對(duì)被偵查對(duì)象以及可能的無(wú)關(guān)第三人的權(quán)利的侵害;通過秘密偵查手段獲取的證據(jù)之效力也存在著疑問;秘密偵查也因?yàn)榱⒎ㄉ系娜毕莶荒艿玫接行б约昂侠淼谋O(jiān)督和制約。盡管如此,秘密偵查在實(shí)踐中對(duì)偵破各種復(fù)雜案件以及疑難重大等案件具有著不可忽視的作用,能夠有效的獲取犯罪證據(jù)、打擊新型犯罪,因此我國(guó)確實(shí)有必要對(duì)秘密偵查進(jìn)行法律上的規(guī)定和制約。本文通過對(duì)比國(guó)外關(guān)于秘密偵查的先進(jìn)立法情況,總結(jié)分析出適合我國(guó)的秘密偵查規(guī)制方式,并從秘密偵查的具體適用等情況進(jìn)行具體的立法建議。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of economy and science and technology in the world, and with the exchange and development of economy, science and technology and culture, the crime of various countries also presents new characteristics, and the modern crime presents a more organized nature. More use of high-tech and more secret features. These changes have posed a new challenge to the way in which crimes are detected: in the past, most countries focused on open investigation, but now they cannot solve modern and new cases in a timely and effective manner only by relying on open investigation. Moreover, in the face of new characteristics of crime, public investigation may waste more resources, but not ideal results. For this reason, countries all over the world began to use secret investigation methods to obtain criminal evidence and combat crime, and achieved good results, our country is no exception, in the process of detection of cases has also adopted different secret investigative techniques. Secret investigation has great privacy and different degrees of tort, but at present, there are no strict legal provisions on the subject, scope and other matters needing attention of secret investigation techniques in our country. This leads to the arbitrariness of the use of secret investigative techniques in practice, and there are no legal restrictions on secret investigation, which results in the infringement of the rights of the object under investigation and the rights of the third party which may have nothing to do with it. The validity of the evidence obtained by secret investigation means is also questionable, and the secret investigation can not be effectively and reasonably supervised and restricted because of the defects in legislation. Nevertheless, secret investigation plays an important role in solving various complicated cases and difficult cases in practice, and can effectively obtain criminal evidence and crack down on new types of crimes. Therefore, it is necessary for our country to carry on the legal regulation and the restriction to the secret investigation. By comparing the foreign advanced legislation on secret investigation, this paper summarizes and analyzes the regulation mode of secret investigation suitable for our country, and makes specific legislative suggestions from the concrete application of secret investigation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號(hào)】:D918
本文編號(hào):2405907
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of economy and science and technology in the world, and with the exchange and development of economy, science and technology and culture, the crime of various countries also presents new characteristics, and the modern crime presents a more organized nature. More use of high-tech and more secret features. These changes have posed a new challenge to the way in which crimes are detected: in the past, most countries focused on open investigation, but now they cannot solve modern and new cases in a timely and effective manner only by relying on open investigation. Moreover, in the face of new characteristics of crime, public investigation may waste more resources, but not ideal results. For this reason, countries all over the world began to use secret investigation methods to obtain criminal evidence and combat crime, and achieved good results, our country is no exception, in the process of detection of cases has also adopted different secret investigative techniques. Secret investigation has great privacy and different degrees of tort, but at present, there are no strict legal provisions on the subject, scope and other matters needing attention of secret investigation techniques in our country. This leads to the arbitrariness of the use of secret investigative techniques in practice, and there are no legal restrictions on secret investigation, which results in the infringement of the rights of the object under investigation and the rights of the third party which may have nothing to do with it. The validity of the evidence obtained by secret investigation means is also questionable, and the secret investigation can not be effectively and reasonably supervised and restricted because of the defects in legislation. Nevertheless, secret investigation plays an important role in solving various complicated cases and difficult cases in practice, and can effectively obtain criminal evidence and crack down on new types of crimes. Therefore, it is necessary for our country to carry on the legal regulation and the restriction to the secret investigation. By comparing the foreign advanced legislation on secret investigation, this paper summarizes and analyzes the regulation mode of secret investigation suitable for our country, and makes specific legislative suggestions from the concrete application of secret investigation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號(hào)】:D918
【引證文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條
1 高哲遠(yuǎn);;偵查監(jiān)督視野下技術(shù)偵查研究[J];河南警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年06期
2 石玲;;對(duì)新刑訴中有關(guān)特殊偵查問題的思考[J];南方論刊;2013年02期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條
1 黃福濤;高哲遠(yuǎn);;偵查監(jiān)督視野下技術(shù)偵查措施研究[A];第八屆國(guó)家高級(jí)檢察官論壇論文集:偵查程序的修改與檢察工作應(yīng)對(duì)[C];2012年
,本文編號(hào):2405907
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/gongan/2405907.html
最近更新
教材專著