【摘要】：隨著我國(guó)工業(yè)化、城市化的快速推進(jìn)，城市化進(jìn)程產(chǎn)生的“拉力”和城鄉(xiāng)差異、地區(qū)失衡產(chǎn)生的“推力”，使得流動(dòng)人口特別是農(nóng)民工的數(shù)量居高不下且不斷增加。據(jù)第六次全國(guó)人口普查數(shù)據(jù)顯示，至2010年11月我國(guó)流動(dòng)人口數(shù)量高達(dá)2.21億人，占全國(guó)總?cè)丝诘?6.5％。同2000年人口普查相比，流動(dòng)人口數(shù)增長(zhǎng)了81.03%。如此龐大的流動(dòng)人口規(guī)模以及迅速增長(zhǎng)的趨勢(shì)，給我國(guó)流動(dòng)人口的社會(huì)管理帶來(lái)了嚴(yán)峻挑戰(zhàn)。 建國(guó)以來(lái)，在二元戶籍制度、市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)體制轉(zhuǎn)型、政府職能轉(zhuǎn)變的宏觀背景下,我國(guó)流動(dòng)人口管理體制的建構(gòu)、發(fā)展與成型呈現(xiàn)出一定的階段性特征,先后經(jīng)歷了1949年-1977年期間的嚴(yán)格限制階段；1978年-1999年期間的防范式管理階段；2000年以來(lái)進(jìn)入了屬地化管理階段。盡管目前我國(guó)針對(duì)流動(dòng)人口的相關(guān)管理政策和法律法規(guī)還處于大變革時(shí)期，但全國(guó)各地區(qū)結(jié)合自身的發(fā)展情況，針對(duì)流動(dòng)人口的社會(huì)管理問(wèn)題，形成了不同的法律治理實(shí)踐模式。大致可分為三種模式：治安管理拓展型（全國(guó)絕大多數(shù)省市采用）、專業(yè)機(jī)構(gòu)協(xié)調(diào)型（代表城市是上海、無(wú)錫和深圳）、大人口機(jī)構(gòu)統(tǒng)籌型（代表城市是江蘇的張家港市和浙江的嘉興市）。 通過(guò)實(shí)踐可以發(fā)現(xiàn)我國(guó)對(duì)流動(dòng)人口的管理主要以政府為管理主體，且基本停留在管制層面，而非真正意義上的治理。具體說(shuō)來(lái)，當(dāng)前我國(guó)流動(dòng)人口的法律治理存在以下困境：主管行政部門協(xié)調(diào)性差，管理隊(duì)伍不足；政府主導(dǎo)管理，流動(dòng)人口參與程度低；管理制度設(shè)計(jì)不合理，，流動(dòng)人口權(quán)益保障不夠；相關(guān)流動(dòng)人口信息采集不清，管理效率低下。而問(wèn)題的根源就在于管理理念滯后、政策法規(guī)不健全、戶籍制度的二元化。所以盡管政府各職能部門對(duì)流動(dòng)人口的社會(huì)管理投入了大量的人力、物力和財(cái)力，流動(dòng)人口管理工作難以適應(yīng)現(xiàn)實(shí)需要。而完善流動(dòng)人口社會(huì)管理是我國(guó)在未來(lái)城市化進(jìn)程和現(xiàn)代化發(fā)展中必須回應(yīng)的重大理論及現(xiàn)實(shí)問(wèn)題，為此，本文在借鑒美國(guó)、日本等發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家的流動(dòng)人口管理經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上，提出了主體層面形成政府、社區(qū)、基層組織齊抓共管的多元治理格局；客體層面實(shí)現(xiàn)流動(dòng)人口基本公共服務(wù)均等化；方式層面以法律為主，形成多措并舉的綜合治理具體路徑，以期我國(guó)流動(dòng)人口的管理走向流動(dòng)人口的法律治理。
[Abstract]:With the industrialization of our country, the rapid advancement of urbanization, the "pull force" produced by urbanization process and the difference between urban and rural areas, and the "thrust" of regional imbalance, the number of floating population, especially migrant workers, has been increasing. According to the data of the sixth national census, by November 2010, the number of floating population in China is as high as 221 million, accounting for 16.5 percent of the total population of the country. Compared with the 2000 census, the number of floating population increased by 81. 03%. Such a large scale of floating population and the trend of rapid growth have brought severe challenges to the social management of floating population in our country. Since the founding of the people's Republic of China, under the macro background of the dual household registration system, the transformation of the market economy system and the transformation of government functions, the construction, development and shaping of the management system of the floating population in China have shown certain stage characteristics. It has experienced the strict restriction stage from 1949 to 1977, the preventive management stage from 1978 to 1999, and the localization management stage since 2000. Although the relevant management policies and laws and regulations for the floating population in China are still in a period of great change, the social management of the floating population is aimed at the social management of the floating population in various regions of the country in light of their own development situation. Formed different legal governance practice model. It can be roughly divided into three modes: the expanded type of public security management (adopted by the vast majority of provinces and cities in the country), and the type of coordination of professional organizations (representing the city of Shanghai, Wuxi and Shenzhen), large population organizations as a whole (representing the cities of Zhangjiagang City, Jiangsu Province and Jiaxing City, Zhejiang Province). Through practice, we can find that the government is the main body of the management of the floating population in our country, and basically stays at the level of control, rather than the real governance. Specifically, the current legal governance of floating population in China has the following difficulties: the administrative department in charge of poor coordination, insufficient management team, government-led management, low level of participation of floating population, unreasonable design of management system, The protection of floating population rights and interests is not enough; the information collection of floating population is not clear, and the management efficiency is low. The root of the problem lies in the lagging management concept, imperfect policies and regulations, and the dualization of the household registration system. Therefore, although the government departments put a lot of manpower, material and financial resources into the social management of floating population, the management of floating population is difficult to meet the needs of reality. To perfect the social management of floating population is an important theoretical and practical problem that our country must respond to in the process of urbanization and modernization in the future. Therefore, this paper draws lessons from the experiences of the United States, Japan and other developed countries in the management of floating population. Put forward the multi-governance pattern of government, community and grass-roots organizations at the subject level; realize the equalization of basic public services of floating population at the object level; take the law as the main way to form the concrete path of comprehensive management. With a view to the management of floating population towards the legal management of floating population.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D631.42;D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 肖輝;遷徙自由的憲法學(xué)分析[J];河北法學(xué);2004年09期

2 陳豐;自治管理:流動(dòng)人口管理的新趨勢(shì)[J];華東理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年03期

3 徐祖榮;;治理與善治語(yǔ)境下公共危機(jī)的多元共治模式[J];華東理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年03期

4 喬耀章;論政府社會(huì)管理中的政府、社會(huì)、公民三者關(guān)系[J];湖北行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

5 黎光宇;;我國(guó)流動(dòng)人口管理的法律制度問(wèn)題研究[J];江西行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期

6 ;流動(dòng)人口管理的社區(qū)化管理模式——兼論建鄴區(qū)南苑街道所街村散居式流動(dòng)人口管理模式[J];科技與經(jīng)濟(jì);2002年04期

7 李文安;論城市政府對(duì)外來(lái)民工實(shí)施總量控制問(wèn)題[J];南都學(xué)壇;2003年02期

8 李濤;任遠(yuǎn);;城市戶籍制度改革與流動(dòng)人口社會(huì)融合[J];南方人口;2011年03期

9 江立華;中外戶籍登記與管理制度的比較——兼談我國(guó)戶籍制度改革的方向[J];廊坊師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年01期

10 鄭功成;;中國(guó)流動(dòng)人口的社會(huì)保障問(wèn)題[J];理論視野;2007年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 孫憶茹;我國(guó)流動(dòng)人口管理的法律問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2010年

2 陶迅江;上海市外來(lái)流動(dòng)人口基本特征與管理對(duì)策研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2011年

3 朱軼波;社區(qū)流動(dòng)人口管理研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2011年

4 潘淑敏;流動(dòng)人口綜合治理現(xiàn)存問(wèn)題及對(duì)策[D];上海交通大學(xué);2007年

5 劉朝暉;城市流動(dòng)人口子女教育調(diào)查與研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2007年

6 龍淼森;我國(guó)城市流動(dòng)人口社會(huì)管理體制研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2007年

7 沙東芬;少數(shù)民族流動(dòng)人口與城市經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展研究[D];中南民族大學(xué);2008年

8 王業(yè)平;長(zhǎng)沙市流動(dòng)人口管理研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2009年

9 李海燕;我國(guó)城市流動(dòng)人口管理研究[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2009年

10 陳曉華;城市流動(dòng)人口子女教育問(wèn)題的調(diào)查研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：2284811